Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We are closing due to a change in practice here that means we are no longer seeing eligible participants
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| uncuffed endotracheal group | Experimental |
| |
| no endotracheal tube group/control | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endotracheal tube | Device | participants either receive the ETT during the procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Desaturation | Whether a patient will experience any desaturation | During the procedure |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| H. Erhan Dincer | University of Minnesota | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 |
Patient will be randomized 1:1 to UCETT vs no ETT (current standard procedure) when they scheduled for the EBUS-TBNA procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided