Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Czech Technical University in Prague | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the project is to investigate whether the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) support, specifically through the GPT-4 model, enhances the decision-making processes of military medical first responders within the framework of Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC). The study focuses on AI's ability to assist in ventilator settings for injured individuals in combat scenarios, emphasizing improved accuracy and decision-making speed. The project tests the hypothesis that the use of AI can positively impact outcomes without compromising the autonomy of first responders. The results have the potential to optimize patient care in challenging conditions and contribute to the advancement of combat medicine.
This study investigates the potential of conversational artificial intelligence (AI), specifically GPT-4, to enhance clinical decision-making in Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) scenarios. The primary objective is to evaluate whether AI support improves the accuracy and efficiency of ventilator management decisions for combat medics in high-pressure environments without compromising their autonomy.
A prospective, randomized, within-subject study design will be employed. Thirty combat medics from the Czech Armed Forces will participate. Each participant will complete 10 simulated TCCC scenarios: five with AI assistance and five without. Scenarios will be matched for complexity and randomized to control for order effects. Participants will use ChatGPT on handheld devices to simulate real-time AI-assisted decision-making.
In scenarios involving AI assistance, medics will query GPT-4 for support in optimizing mechanical ventilator settings based on patient data, including blood gas results, vital signs, and ventilator parameters.
The primary outcome is the accuracy of ventilator settings as categorized into "excellent," "acceptable," or "failing" based on predefined TCCC standards. Secondary outcomes include decision-making speed and participants' perception of AI's utility, measured through post-scenario surveys.
The findings aim to determine the feasibility of integrating large language models (LLMs) into combat medical care to optimize patient outcomes and support medics under combat conditions. The study seeks to advance the understanding of AI's role in military medicine, providing a foundation for future deployment of fine-tuned AI solutions in TCCC and other critical care scenarios.
This study offers a proof-of-concept evaluation of LLM applications in combat casualty care, with the potential to improve decision-making and inform the development of specialized AI tools for military use.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combat Medic Decision-Making with and without AI Assistance | Experimental | All participants will complete 10 Tactical Combat Casualty Care scenarios: 5 with AI assistance using GPT-4 for ventilator management and 5 without AI assistance. The crossover design ensures each participant experiences both conditions. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combat Medic Decision-Making with and without artificial intelligence assistance | Other | Participants will complete 10 simulated Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) scenarios, with 5 scenarios conducted using AI assistance (GPT-4) and 5 without AI. In AI-assisted scenarios, participants will use GPT-4 to query and optimize ventilator settings based on patient data, while non-AI scenarios rely solely on their clinical judgment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of ventilator settings | Accuracy of ventilator settings as categorized into "excellent," "acceptable," or "failing" based on predefined TCCC standards. Excellent means 2 points, acceptable 1 point and failing 0 point. | 1 hour |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Perception of artificial intelligence's utility | perception of artificial intelligence's utility, measured through post-scenario survey | 1 hour |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michal Soták, M.D., Ph.D. | Charles University, Czech Republic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Military University Hospital Prague | Prague | 16209 | Czechia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37948287 | Result | Nemeth C, Amos-Binks A, Rule G, Laufersweiler D, Keeney N, Flint I, Pinevich Y, Herasevich V. TCCC Decision Support With Machine Learning Prediction of Hemorrhage Risk, Shock Probability. Mil Med. 2023 Nov 8;188(Suppl 6):659-665. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad298. | |
| 38728687 | Result | Preiksaitis C, Ashenburg N, Bunney G, Chu A, Kabeer R, Riley F, Ribeira R, Rose C. The Role of Large Language Models in Transforming Emergency Medicine: Scoping Review. JMIR Med Inform. 2024 May 10;12:e53787. doi: 10.2196/53787. |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data will not be shared due to concerns regarding participant confidentiality, data privacy, and the sensitive nature of the study involving military personnel. Aggregate data and study findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publications and presentations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Crossover assignment (each participant acts as their own control in scenarios with and without artificial intelligence)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|