Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the integrity of somatosensory processing with transcranial magnetique stimulation (TMS) and corticospinal excitability of the affected shoulder in individuals with adhesive capsulitis versus healthy controls.
The secondary objective is to compare the clinical and neurophysiological effects of an intervention using tendon vibration (VIB) to induced kinesthetic illusions. This will involve comparing two groups: one receiving a real intervention versus a placebo intervention protocol, both coupled with standardized exercises in individuals with capsulitis. The hypotheses are that the proprioceptive processing and corticospinal excitability are impaired in the presence of capsulitis, and that the VIB + exercises intervention will result in greater improvements than the placebo VIB + exercises.
To goal is to establish the first empirical foundations for understanding adhesive capsulitis, using cutting-edge neurophysiological investigation technologies.
TMS will be used to explore the presence of maladaptive plasticity in motor networks by assessing the excitability and integrity of the primary motor cortex (M1) and the corticospinal tract.
Recruitement:
30 healthy participants and 30 participants with a diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis will undergo 2 baselines assesments, 6 interventions with tendon vibration and 2 follow-up evaluation. Participants will be age- and sex-matched.
Baseline and follw-up include:
Comparison parameters:
Interventions :
2 baselines including all questionnaires, ultrasound, active and passive range of motion, TMS procedure and SKIP;
2 VIB interventions per week, for 3 weeks
2 follow-up including all questionnaires, ultrasound, active and passive range of motion, TMS procedure and SKIP.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tendon vibration and standardized exercise protocol | Experimental | Six interventions inducing kinesthetic illusions (20 minutes, 1 illusion/minute). Two interventions per week, for three weeks. Accompanied by a daily exercise protocol. |
|
| Tendon vibration without kinesthetic illusion and standardized exercise protocol | Sham Comparator | Six interventions not inducing kinesthetic illusions (20 minutes) Two interventions per week, for three weeks. Accompanied by a daily exercise protocol. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tendon Vibration | Device | Vibration can create kinesthetic illusions when applied at some modalities. The vibration will be put at 80 Hz and 1 mm of amplitude for 10 seconds to create 1 illusion/minute, during 20 minutes. Two interventions per week, for three weeks. Total : 6 interventions |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Shoulder Pain And Disability Index | SPADI : Shoulder Pain And Disability Index Thirteen questions to quantify the level of difficulty, ranging from 0 to 10, based on pain and disability. Five questions assess pain (0 = no pain, 10= worst pain imaginable) and eight questions assess the level of difficulty in performing different tasks (0= no difficulty, 10=too difficult, need help). | at baseline 1 and follow-up 1 : 2 months |
| Quick Disability of the Hand, Arm and Shoulder | QuickDASH : Quick Disability of the Hand, Arm and Shoulder Allowing the calculation of a percentage ratio from 14 questions, using a visual analogue scale from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (incapacity), on the effects of pain on daily life activities, work, and sports, in addition to associated symptoms such as paresthesia and sleep disturbances. | at baseline 1 and follow-up 1: 2 months |
| Questionnaire St-Antoine | French version of McGill Pain Questionnaire. Subjectively assess the pain level with 16 questions on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (extremely severe). | at baseline 1 and follow-up 1: 2 months |
| Range of motion | Measuring the active and passive range of motion with a goniometer. | at baseline 1 and follow-up 1: 2 months |
| Standardized Kinesthetic Illusion Procedure | Using the SKIP to evaluate:
| at baseline 1/2 and follow-up 1/2 : 2 months (+/- 2 weeks) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sociodemographic - age | Age of each participant, in months | at baseline 1 : 1 day |
| Sociodemographic - Sex | Physiological sex | at baseline 1: 1 day |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Émilie Bouchard, M.Sc. PhD candidate | Contact | 581-882-0300 | e4bouch@uqac.ca | |
| Louis-David Beaulieu, PhD | Contact | 418 545-5011 | 6109 | ldbeauli@uqac.ca |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lab BioNR - UQAC | Recruiting | Saguenay | Quebec | G7H 2B1 | Canada |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002062 | Bursitis |
| D007088 | Illusions |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
Not provided
Not provided
Double blinded randomized controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Exercices | Other | Standardized exercise protocol, performed daily for 3 weeks, with a diary. |
|
| Tendon vibration | Device | Tendon vibration will not induce kinesthetic illusions, since it will be applied 40 Hz and 1 mm of amplitude for 10 seconds. Two interventions per week, for three weeks. Total : 6 interventions |
|
| Active motor threshold | The active motor threshold represents the intensity of stimulation (%) required to elicit measurable motor evoked potentials. | at baseline 1-2 and follow-up 1-2: 2 months (+/- 2 weeks) |
| Amplitude of motor evoked potential | The measurement of the motor evoked potential amplitude (peak-to-peak) It corresponds to the amount of neurons stimulated at the central et peripheral levels, expressed in microvolts. | at baseline 1-2 and follow-up 1-2: 2 months (+/- 2 weeks) |
| Latency of motor evoked potential | The measurement of the motor evoked potential latency in miliseconds. It represent the conduction time from the application of the stimuli over the cortex to the target muscle. | at baseline 1-2 and follow-up 1-2: 2 months (+/- 2 weeks) |
| Sociodemographic - Weight | kilograms | at baseline 1: 1 day |
| Sociodemographic - Height | in meters | at baseline 1: 1 day |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |