Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Functional impairment in the upper extremities is one of the most common sequelae in stroke patients. It significantly limits the patients' grasping-releasing functions and, consequently, their activities of daily living (ADL), such as eating - drinking, dressing, and self-care. Action Observation Training (AOT), performed by observing simple actions frequently used in ADL and then imitating the observed actions, reduces interhemispheric inhibition and allows the elimination of impairments in upper extremity motor function and relearning of functions in chronic stroke patients. This study aims to investigate the effects of telerehabilitation and face-to-face AOT application on upper extremity functions, activities of daily living, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients and to question whether there are differences between the short- and long-term effects of these two AOT applications.
Stroke is defined as a neurological picture caused by focal damage to the central nervous system due to vascular problems such as cerebral infarction or intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Functional impairment in the upper extremities is one of the most common sequelae in stroke patients. It significantly limits the patients' grasping-releasing functions and, consequently, their activities of daily living (ADL), such as eating - drinking, dressing, and self-care.
Action Observation Therapy (AOT), which is performed by observing simple actions frequently used in ADL and then imitating the observed actions, is a rehabilitation approach used in recent years to improve upper limb functions in the rehabilitation of stroke and various neurological diseases. It is stated that AOT reduces interhemispheric inhibition and allows the elimination of impairments in motor function and relearning of functions.
Telerehabilitation is the remote delivery of rehabilitation services through telecommunication technology. Telerehabilitation provides important advantages, such as difficulty transferring the patient to the health center, where the rehabilitation process takes a long time, travel time, and travel costs in stroke patients.
In the literature review, no study was found comparing the effect of the AOT with the telerehabilitation method and face-to-face application on the patient's upper extremity functions, activities of daily living, and quality of life in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic stroke. In addition, to our knowledge, there is no study examining the long-term effects of AOT, which has been the subject of a limited number of studies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Action Observation Therapy | Experimental | Patients received action observation therapy in addition to general physiotherapy via telerehabilitation method, 3 days a week for 5 weeks. |
|
| Control | Active Comparator | Patients received general physiotherapy in addition to face-to-face action observation treatment 3 days per week for 5 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Action Observation Therapy | Other | Patients received general physiotherapy in addition to action observation therapy (AOT) via telerehabilitation method for 5 weeks, 3 days a week. AOT was applied to patients as a single session per day and lasted 30 minutes. General physiotherapy session was applied face to face for 45 minutes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Spasticity | Spasticity will assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale. As the score increases, spasticity increases. The minimum score for this scale is 1 and the maximum score is 5. | Baseline |
| Stage of hemiplegia | "Brunnstrom Hemiplegia Recovery Staging" will be used to determine the hemiplegic stage of the patients. This scale is scored between 1 and 6. As the score increases, the patient improves. | Baseline |
| Motor function | The "Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Scale" will be used to evaluate upper extremity motor functions. This scale ranges from 0 to 66 points. As the score increases, motor function improves. | Baseline, five week later (after intervention), 3 months later |
| Dominant side | The "Edinburgh Hand Preference Test" will be used to determine the dominant side used by the patient in daily life. | Baseline |
| Trunk Impairment | "Trunk Impairment Scale" will be used to evaluate trunk impairment in stroke patients. The maximum score that can be obtained from the scale is 23 points. A low score indicates poor performance, a high score indicates good performance | Baseline |
| Upper extremity function | Evaluation of upper extremity functions (hand-arm) and motor speed will be done with the "Nine-Hole Peg Test". Function decreases as the time spent for the test increases. | Baseline, five week later (after intervention), 3 months later |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mustafa KAVAK, MsC | Karabuk University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mustafa KAVAK | Karabük | Karabük Province | 78100 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33652680 | Result | Mancuso M, Tondo SD, Costantini E, Damora A, Sale P, Abbruzzese L. Action Observation Therapy for Upper Limb Recovery in Patients with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 26;11(3):290. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11030290. | |
| 36160327 | Result | Shamili A, Hassani Mehraban A, Azad A, Raissi GR, Shati M. Effects of Meaningful Action Observation Therapy on Occupational Performance, Upper Limb Function, and Corticospinal Excitability Poststroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial. Neural Plast. 2022 Sep 16;2022:5284044. doi: 10.1155/2022/5284044. eCollection 2022. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Research study | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Control | Other | Patients received general physiotherapy in addition to action observation therapy (AOT) via face-to-face telerehabilitation method for 5 weeks, 3 days a week. AOT was applied to patients as a single session per day and lasted 30 minutes. General physiotherapy session was applied face-to-face for 45 minutes. |
|
| Functional Independence | Evaluation of upper extremity functions will be done with the "Nine-Hole Peg Test". Function decreases as the time spent on the test increases. | Baseline, five week later (after intervention), 3 months later |
| Cognitif Function | Mini Mental Test will be used to evaluate cognitive functions. In the evaluation, 24-30 points indicate that cognitive functions are normal, 18-23 points indicate mild cognitive impairment, and 17 points and below indicate that cognitive status is severely affected. | Baseline |
| Neglect | The Catherine Bergego Scale will be used to assess the impact of unilateral neglect after stroke on activities of daily living. 1-10 indicates mild neglect, 11-20 indicates moderate neglect, and 21-30 indicates severe neglect. | Baseline |
| Life Quality | The Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale will be used to assess the quality of life of individuals with stroke. The higher the total score, the better the quality of life of the individual with stroke. This scale is scored between 49-245.As the score increases, the quality of life increases. | Baseline, five week later (after intervention), 3 months later |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |