Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Reorganisation and difficulties of neurology service of CHU Orleans
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of Repeated Muscle Vibration (rMV) on motor recovery in acute stroke patients treated within 72 hours of symptom onset
After enrollment (T0), patients are randomly assigned to either the vibration group (VG) or the control group (CG). Patients in the VG will receive rMV treatment, while those in the CG receive sham treatment. Both interventions are administered on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd days post-enrollment. Physiokinesitherapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) are provided daily to all patients, starting immediately after the T0 clinical evaluation. Patients are re-evaluated after 4 ± 1 days (T-1), marking the end of the treatment period.
Upon admission, demographic details and medical histories of all participants are recorded. Each patient undergoes clinical evaluations at all time points by an experienced investigator blinded to group allocation and distinct from the recruiting personnel. The clinical assessment includes stroke severity evaluation using the NIH Stroke Scale, motor and functional limb abilities using the Fugl-Meyer scale, SAFE score, and Motricity Index. Additionally, bioimpedance analysis of muscle mass and phase angle in the impaired upper limb is performed using the BWA device.
All participants follow a standardized daily rehabilitation program. Physical therapists, blinded to treatment allocation, are instructed on the duration, frequency, and content of therapy to ensure consistency across groups.
Low-amplitude rMV (frequency: 100 Hz; amplitude: 1-2 mm) is applied to the flexor carpi radialis and biceps brachii for upper limb treatment, using a commercial device (VibraMoov Physio, TechnoConcept, Mane, France). The rMV sessions are conducted over three consecutive days by two trained physiotherapists, with each daily session comprising three 10-minute treatments (per treated limb) interspersed with 1-minute breaks.
During the rMV sessions, participants are instructed to perform voluntary isometric contractions of the treated muscle. In contrast, CG participants undergo sham rMV, where the vibrator is positioned near the tendon but without vibration.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with Vibration | Experimental | VG participants undergo rMV treatment, carried out for three consecutive days by 2 trained physiatrists; each daily session consists of three 10-minute treatment (impaired upper limb), interspersed with a 1-minute break. During the rMV, subjects are required to make a voluntary isometric contraction of the treated muscle |
|
| Control group (CG) | Sham Comparator | Participants in the CG undergo sham rMV, where the vibrator is positioned near the tendon but does not produce vibrations. Sham rMV treatment is carried out for three consecutive days by 2 trained physiatrists; each daily session consists of three 10-minute treatment (impaired upper limb), interspersed with a 1-minute break. During the rMV, subjects are required to make a voluntary isometric contraction of the treated muscle |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repeated Muscle Vibration (rMV) | Device | rMV treatment, carried out for three consecutive days by 2 trained physiatrists; each daily session consists of three 10-minute treatment (impaired upper limb), interspersed with a 1-minute break. During the rMV, subjects are required to make a voluntary isometric contraction of the treated muscle |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Upper limb Fugl Meyer Assessment Score (UL-FMA) | This is a 66-point scale. A score of 0 corresponds to the maximum deficit and a score of 66 to a normal value. | Day 4 from start of experiment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Upper limb strength | A digital Jamar dynamometer is used to measure the flexion muscular strength of the deficient limb. The force value to be collected at each time point is the average of the 3 tests.Handgrip strength in kilograms | Day 4 from start of experiment |
| Motricity Index (Demeurisse) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Canan OZSANCAK, MD | CHU Orleans | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU d'ORLEANS | Orléans | 45067 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26206167 | Background | Bertrand AM, Fournier K, Wick Brasey MG, Kaiser ML, Frischknecht R, Diserens K. Reliability of maximal grip strength measurements and grip strength recovery following a stroke. J Hand Ther. 2015 Oct-Dec;28(4):356-62; quiz 363. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 9. | |
| 31730754 | Background | Bobos P, Nazari G, Lu Z, MacDermid JC. Measurement Properties of the Hand Grip Strength Assessment: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Mar;101(3):553-565. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.183. Epub 2019 Nov 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Each patient undergoes clinical evaluations at all time points by an experienced investigator blinded to group allocation and distinct from the recruiting personnel.
Physical therapists, blinded to treatment allocation, are instructed on the duration, frequency, and content of therapy to ensure consistency across groups.
|
It assesses the motor skills of the upper limb as a whole, with elementary movements (thumb-index pinch,elbow flexion, shoulder abduction). Scoring ranges from 0 - corresponding to no movement - to 33 - corresponding to movement with normal strength. The upper limb score is calculated by summing the score obtained for each of the 3 movements, adding 1 and dividing by 100. |
| Day 4 from start of experiment |
| SAFE Score | This is a 10 point scale. A score of 0 corresponds to no muscle contraction and a score of 10 to a normal muscular strength | Day 4 from start of experiment |
| Total NIHSS | A 15-item impairment rating scale designed to assess the neurological consequences and degree of recovery of a stroke patient. Each item is rated from 0 to 2, 0 to 3 or 0 to 4. Each item that is non-testable is scored as "NT". A score of 0 indicates normal performance. NIHSS total scores range from 0 to 42, with higher values reflecting more severe brain damage. | Day 4 from start of experiment |
| muscular mass of the impaired upper limb | Day 4 from start of experiment |
| Phase angle of the impaired upper limb | Day 4 from start of experiment |
| 22507444 | Background | Caliandro P, Celletti C, Padua L, Minciotti I, Russo G, Granata G, La Torre G, Granieri E, Camerota F. Focal muscle vibration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity: a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;93(9):1656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Apr 13. |
| 28240760 | Background | Celletti C, Sinibaldi E, Pierelli F, Monari G, Camerota F. Focal Muscle Vibration and Progressive Modular Rebalancing with neurokinetic facilitations in post- stroke recovery of upper limb. Clin Ter. 2017 Jan-Feb;168(1):e33-e36. doi: 10.7417/CT.2017.1979. |
| 27598342 | Background | Costantino C, Galuppo L, Romiti D. Short-term effect of local muscle vibration treatment versus sham therapy on upper limb in chronic post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Feb;53(1):32-40. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04211-8. Epub 2016 Sep 6. |
| 7439211 | Background | Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol. 1980;19(6):382-9. doi: 10.1159/000115178. |
| 1135616 | Background | Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31. |
| 30873102 | Background | Toscano M, Celletti C, Vigano A, Altarocca A, Giuliani G, Jannini TB, Mastria G, Ruggiero M, Maestrini I, Vicenzini E, Altieri M, Camerota F, Di Piero V. Short-Term Effects of Focal Muscle Vibration on Motor Recovery After Acute Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Sham-Controlled Study. Front Neurol. 2019 Feb 19;10:115. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00115. eCollection 2019. |
| 34217068 | Background | Abe T, Yoshimura Y, Imai R, Yoneoka Y, Tsubaki A, Sato Y. Impact of Phase Angle on Physical Function in Patients with Acute Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105941. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105941. Epub 2021 Jun 30. |
| 35587756 | Background | Abe T, Yoshimua Y, Imai R, Sato Y. A Combined Assessment Method of Phase Angle and Skeletal Muscle Index to Better Predict Functional Recovery after Acute Stroke. J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26(5):445-451. doi: 10.1007/s12603-022-1777-9. |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |