Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will follow 100 women over 36 months (3 years) to evaluate how safe and effective a minimally invasive breast augmentation procedure is. The women will have their first breast augmentation surgery using Motiva® Ergonomix2 Diamond® implants, Motiva Injector® and Motiva® Inflatable Balloon.
This is a prospective follow-up, 36-month, open, interventional study to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the procedure and system devices, including Motiva® Ergonomix2 Diamond® implants in women subjected to primary breast augmentation.
This study will enroll 100 women who will undergo a minimally invasive breast augmentation procedure with Ergonomix2 Diamond® using Motiva Injector® MIA and the Motiva MIA® inflatable balloon. The study duration will be 36 months and a six-month enrollment window was planned.
Recruitment will take place after enrollment and before any clinical research procedures, a participant will sign and date the Informed Consent Form. This will be considered the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Since there will be a subset of women who will provide their consent to participate but will not undergo the procedure (i.e., due to a screening failure or consent withdrawal before the surgery, the analysis population for this study will be the full analysis set ("treated population") which will be made up by women that have received the implant(s) and that have at least one postop evaluation.
A Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) substudy will be performed to determine the rate of silent rupture (no signs or symptoms) both extra- and intracapsular, and to identify displacement and/or gel fracture. MRI scans in this study will be performed on participants who are 18 to 21 months post-op. However, any study participant, whether or not participating in this sub study, who presents with signs or symptoms suggestive of a rupture, will be referred for MRI evaluation at any time during the study. Information obtained from the MRI study will be collected on the MRI Case Report Form by the investigator.
The proposed sample size of 33 participants in the MRI substudy, considered to be the industry standard, one third of the total sample participating in the Motiva MIA® study, and who consent to participate in this substudy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimally Invasive breast augmentation | Experimental | Minimally invasive breast augmentation procedure with a trans-axillary approach. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimally invasive breast augmentation procedure with a trans-axillary approach. | Device | Minimally invasive breast augmentation procedure with a transaxillary approach using Motiva Ergonomix2 Diamond®, Motiva Injector® and Motiva® Inflatable Balloon. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | Cumulative incidence (number of cases) of adverse events during surgery and the follow-up period, severity and duration of all complications (rate of adverse events related to the procedure / adverse events related to the device). | From minimally invasive procedure through study completion, an average of 3 years. |
| Effectiveness | Effectiveness will be measured as satisfactory on all breast augmentation procedures using Mia® devices if no device failures have occurred. | From minimally invasive procedure through study completion, an average of 3 years. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient satisfaction | Percentage of participants in the BREAST-Q© augmentation model according to the scale. | From week 1 post-procedure to the end of the follow-up period |
| Patient satisfaction |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Device Malfuctioning | Finalizing the expected placement of the breast implant without the device malfunctioning. | During minimally invasive procedure |
| Use of conventional surgical techniques | Finalizing the expected placement of the breast implant without the need for correcting or adjusting using conventional surgical techniques. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Genetic females, ≥ 18 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centro Europeo de Cirugía | San José | Costa Rica |
Once the study is complete, the sponsor will analyze the data collected by the principal investigator and will conduct a scientific publication with all parties involved to unveil the study results.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Central trend (mean) of participants in the BREAST-Q© augmentation model according to the scale.
| From week 1 post-procedure to the end of the follow-up period |
| Patient satisfaction | Variability (standard deviation) of participants in the BREAST-Q© augmentation model according to the scale. | From week 1 post-procedure to the end of the follow-up period |
| Surgeon satisfaction | Surgeon satisfaction with the results of the minimally invasive procedure using the satisfaction 5-item Likert scale, named Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). | During minimally invasive procedure |
| During minimally invasive procedure |
| Surgical pocket | Performing a surgical pocket dissection procedure to adequately place the implant. | During minimally invasive procedure |