Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This prospective study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AVELI for reducing cellulite and fibrotic tissue in patients undergoing High-Definition Liposculpture, exploring if AVELI improves the aesthetic outcomes, and reduced the clinically evident cellulite and/or fibrosis.
The main questions this study seeks to answer are:
Through this study, the study team aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AVELI.
The study procedures include:
Study design: Interventional prospective cohort study, non-randomized, non-controlled, no masking.
Ethical Considerations:
Eligible patients will be approached, the study aims, objectives, procedures, and voluntary participation will be explained. In case patient consent to participate, a written informed consent will be signed. The patients will be comprehensively evaluated by the plastic surgeon, and assigned to a group based on their individual physical evaluation findings: Cellulite Group, Fibrosis Group, Fibrosis and Cellulite Group.
Study Locations:
Data Collection:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulite group (CG) | Experimental | Patients with any degree of clinically evident cellulite undergoing HDL + AVÉLI treatment for Cellulite. |
|
| Fibrosis Group (FG) | Experimental | Patients with any degree of fibrosis undergoing non-primary HDL + AVÉLI release of fibrotic tissue. |
|
| Fibrosis and Cellulite Group (FCG) | Experimental | Patients with any degree of clinically evident cellulite AND fibrosis undergoing non-primary HDL + AVÉLI treatment for both. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVELI | Device | Minimally invasive method for selectively identifying and manually releasing specific septa responsible for causing cellulite depressions. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Serious Adverse Events Incidence | Incidence of intervention-related serious adverse events (SAE). SAE were defined as any adverse events that met one or more of the following criteria: required hospital care, required additional medical intervention or treatment, produced any disability, were classified as life-threatening, or resulted in the death of the patient. | 30 days |
| Patient Satisfaction Scores | Patient-reported satisfaction scores measured using Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) for the reduction of cellulite and/or fibrosis. The GAIS is a standardized scale used primarily in cosmetic and dermatological treatments to assess the overall aesthetic improvement of a patient after a procedure. It consist of three questions:
| 6 months |
| Photographic aesthetic outcomes analysis | Through 3D camera photos and photographic software, an analysis will objectively calculate the differences between preoperative contour defects (fibrosis and/or cellulite) and postoperative improvement. | One month, three months, six months, and nine months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami Aesthetic | Miami | Florida | 33131 | United States | ||
| Dhara Clinic |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36351188 | Background | Stevens WG, Green JB, Layt C, Kaminer MS, Harrington J, Fan L, Wall HC, Fabi S, Magnusson MR. Multicenter Pivotal Study Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy of a New Cellulite Procedure: Final Results at 12 Months. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Mar 15;43(4):455-466. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac291. | |
| 35089992 | Background | Stevens WG, Kaminer MS, Fabi SG, Fan L. Study of a New Controlled Focal Septa Release Cellulite Reduction Method. Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Aug 1;42(8):937-945. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac010. |
Not provided
Not provided
Depending upon reasonable request
After results publication (manuscript)
Request to the main author
Not provided
Not provided
All the participants are categorized into the 3 different intervention groups based on the individual pre-procedure physical exam by the plastic surgeon. Once in the study group, the patient receives the intervention corresponding to this arm of the study.
Not provided
Not provided
No masking was feasible for this study
Not provided
| Bogotá |
| DC |
| Colombia |
| 31432229 | Background | Danilla S, Babaitis RA, Jara RP, Quispe DA, Andrades PR, Erazo CA, Albornoz CR, Sepulveda SL. High-Definition Liposculpture: What are the Complications and How to Manage Them? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;44(2):411-418. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01475-6. Epub 2019 Aug 20. |
| 32976174 | Background | Bass LS, Kaminer MS. Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Cellulite: A Review. Dermatol Surg. 2020 Oct;46 Suppl 1(1):S77-S85. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002388. |
| 28123311 | Background | Friedmann DP, Vick GL, Mishra V. Cellulite: a review with a focus on subcision. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2017 Jan 7;10:17-23. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S95830. eCollection 2017. |
| 37424836 | Background | Gabriel A, Chan V, Caldarella M, Wayne T, O'Rorke E. Cellulite: Current Understanding and Treatment. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Jun 21;5:ojad050. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad050. eCollection 2023. |
| 34121946 | Background | Ferry AM, Chamata E, Dibbs RP, Rappaport NH. Avoidance and Correction of Deformities in Body Contouring. Semin Plast Surg. 2021 May;35(2):110-118. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727207. Epub 2021 Jun 8. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000071697 | Cellulite |
| D005355 | Fibrosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012877 | Skin Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided