Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Lack of interest by parole division in continuing training.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Herbert Simon Family Foundation | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a mind-body medicine training program on parole services staff. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Sixty staff members of the Indiana Department of Correction Parole Services Division will do the following:
Participants will also do the following:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mind-Body MedicineTraining/Practicum/Group Consultation Sessions | Other | The only arm is a mind-body medicine training program for parole staff. The training program consists of 3 parts: 1. An initial 4-day training; 2. A 2-day practicum; and 3. Four group consultation sessions. . |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mind-Body Medicine Training Program | Other | The 4-day training includes lectures and small group participation. Lecture topics cover information on a variety of mind--body techniques and the small groups allow participants to practice the techniques. The 2-day practicum will teach staff the ways in which they can share the skills they have learned one-on-one with parolees and families of parolees. The practicum lectures will provide a review of the mind-body skills and examples of practical applications. The practicum will also include breakout sessions to allow participants to practice their skills. The four 2-hour group consultation sessions will allow time for the trained staff to share their experiences as they teach these skills to others and ask any questions that may arise. These consultations will support the ongoing sharing of mind-body medicine skills with the parolees and the families of parolees. Edit |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline on Resilience assessed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) after the 4-day training and 3 months after the last group consultation session | Resilience will be measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). The CD-RISC consists of 25 questions that are rated on a 5-point scale, with higher scores representing greater resilience. Change = (Score after the 4-day training) minus (Baseline score); (Score 3 months after the last group consultation session) minus (Score after the 4-day training); and (Score 3 months after the last group consultation session) minus (Baseline score) | Baseline, after the 4-day training, and 3 months after the last group consultation session |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline on Coping Self-efficacy assessed using the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSE scale) after the 4-day training and 3 months after the last group consultation session | Improvements in self-efficacy will be measured using the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSE scale). The CSE scale consists of 26 items that are rated using an 11-point scale that ranges from "0 = Cannot do at all" to "10 = Certain can do". Higher scores indicate greater levels of coping self-efficacy. Change = (Score after the 4-day training) minus (Baseline score); (Score 3 months after the last group consultation session) minus (Score after the 4-day training); and (Score 3 months after the last group consultation session) minus (Baseline score) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Focus Group for Parole Staff Who Are Using Mind-Body Skills with Their Supervised Parolees | Focus group interviews determine will how parole staff have been using what was taught in the mind-body medicine training and how the training has affected them, their work, and their supervision of parolees. | 3 months after the last consultation group |
Inclusion Criteria for Mind-Body Medicine Training :
Exclusion Criteria for Mind-Body Medicine Training:
• None: It is expected that all parole staff will be able to fully participate in the training and the small groups included in the training
Inclusion Criteria for Focus Group Participation :
Exclusion Criteria for Focus Group Participation:
• None, as long as the trained staff meet the inclusion criteria.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Julie K Staples, PhD | The Center for Mind-Body Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana Department of Correction | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46204 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16004657 | Background | Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;44(Pt 2):227-39. doi: 10.1348/014466505X29657. | |
| 20604629 | Background | Demerouti E, Mostert K, Bakker AB. Burnout and work engagement: a thorough investigation of the independency of both constructs. J Occup Health Psychol. 2010 Jul;15(3):209-222. doi: 10.1037/a0019408. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| This page describes The Center for Mind-Body Medicine Training Program | View source |
Not provided
Only IPD used in the results in the publication
January 2028 - no end date
Any researcher may request the de-identified IPD from the corresponding author and it will be provided by email.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077062 | Burnout, Psychological |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013315 | Stress, Psychological |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Non-controlled repeated measures
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Baseline, after the 4-day training, and 3 months after the last group consultation session |
| Change from Baseline on Empathy will be assessed using the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) after the 4-day training and 3 months after the last group consultation | Improvements in empathy will be measured using the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ). The TEQ scale consists of 16 items that are rated using a 5-point scale that ranges from "0 = never" to "4 = always. Higher scores indicate higher levels of empathy. Change = (Score after the 4-day training) minus (Baseline score); (Score 3 months after the last group consultation session) minus (Score after the 4-day training); and (Score 3 months after the last group consultation session) minus (Baseline score) | Baseline, after the 4-day training, and 3 months after the last group consultation session |
| Change from Baseline on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress using the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale -21 (DASS-21) after the 4-day training and 3 months after the last group consultation session | The DASS - 21 consists of 7 questions each to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Higher scores indicated higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress. Change = (Score after the 4-day training) minus (Baseline score); (Score 3 months after the last group consultation session) minus (Score after the 4-day training); and (Score 3 months after the last group consultation session) minus (Baseline score) | Baseline, after the 4-day training, and 3 months after the last group consultation session |
| Change from Baseline Burnout using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) after the 4-day training and 3 months after the last group consultation session | Decreases in burnout will be measured with Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). The OLBI consists of 16-items that are rated using a 4-point scale that ranges from "1= strongly agree" to "4 = strongly disagree". There are two subscales: Exhaustion and Disengagement. Higher scores indicated greater levels of burnout. Change = (Score after the 4-day training) minus (Baseline score); (Score 3 months after the last group consultation session) minus (Score after the 4-day training); and (Score 3 months after the last group consultation session) minus (Baseline score) | Baseline, after the 4-day training, and 3 months after the last group consultation session |
| 19085285 | Background | Spreng RN, McKinnon MC, Mar RA, Levine B. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. J Pers Assess. 2009 Jan;91(1):62-71. doi: 10.1080/00223890802484381. |
| 16870053 | Background | Chesney MA, Neilands TB, Chambers DB, Taylor JM, Folkman S. A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. Br J Health Psychol. 2006 Sep;11(Pt 3):421-37. doi: 10.1348/135910705X53155. |
| 12964174 | Background | Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113. |