A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Constrained Condylar vs Posterior Stabilized Articulations in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Constrained Condylar vs Posterior Stabilized Articulations in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
This study aims to compare the clinical impact of Constrained Condylar versus Posterior Stabilized Knee (PS) bearings on patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes including mid-term survivorship among patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether a difference exists in clinical patient reported outcomes between CCK or PS bearings following rTKA. A secondary goal of the study is to compare both bearings in survivorship free of revision surgery as well as other surgical complications including instability, in early to mid-term follow-up.
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients undergoing rTKA with a hinged implant, or pre-operatively determined to require CCK bearing rTKA, > 80 years of age, or those requiring rTKA less than 6-weeks from the primary TKA,
Patients undergoing rTKA for bearing exchange only rTKA, isolated tibial component rTKA
Patients with pre-operative diagnosis of extensor mechanism disruption or collateral ligament incompetence or with a compromised soft tissue envelope requiring pre-pre-operative plastic surgery evaluation and planned soft tissue coverage.
-
omar.behery@rushortho.com630-339-2230
anne.debenedetti@rushortho.com312-432-2468