Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bishop's University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study was to qualitatively document the social validity of an intervention combining creative arts and philosophy inquiry and to examine its acceptability, the perceived goals, and perceived benefits for children's mental health and ability to cope with climate change from the perspective of one elemetary-school class students and their teacher.
The guiding research question was: How do children and their teacher perceive the acceptability, the goals and the benefits of the intervention? The participants were asked to participate in a seven-week creative arts and philosophical inquiry intervention. Once a week, a research assistant led a workshop using creative arts and group philosophical inquiry to discuss the topic of climate change and the emotions that can arise. Students participated in a brief individual interview after the intervention. The teacher also participated in an individual online interview.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative arts an philosophy inquiry intervention | Other | Participation in a seven-week school-based creative arts and philosophy inquiry intervention to talk about climate change emotions |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Making room for climate emotions in the classroom | Other | The "Making room for climate emotions in the classroom" program is designed to address emotions as students learn (formally or informally) about climate change. Each session features a drawing, photography, Lego sculpture, rock painting or collage/drawing workshop to address themes, explore emotions/feelings/experiences and initiate discussions on topics related to climate change. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Social validity of the intervention | The social validity comprises of the perceived acceptability, goals and benefits of the intervention from participants' perspectives. It was measured using semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions to allow children and teachers to freely describe in detail their experience of the intervention. The interview guide was developed by the research team and piloted in previous research project to ensure that children understood the questions and that it allowed both positive and negative elements related to the intervention to emerge. | Immediately after the end of the intervention (at week 7) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop's University | Sherbrooke | Quebec | J1M 1Z7 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41361496 | Derived | Leger-Goodes T, Herba CM, Piche J, Smith J, Ethier MA, Lefrancois D, Malboeuf-Hurtubise C. I want to talk about climate change, but I wish I didn't have to: A descriptive qualitative study of an intervention combining creative arts and philosophical inquiry to help elementary school students cope with climate change emotions. BMC Psychol. 2025 Dec 8;13(1):1339. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03589-w. |
Not provided
Not provided
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the nature of qualitative data that might contain identifying information through the interview (e.g., speech slurs) but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The manuscript contains excerpts of the verbatim content that support each of the themes presented. Full data are not made available to ensure the confidentiality of the participants.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The ORBIT model for intervention development is a framework developed by Czajkowski and colleagues (2015) in collaboration with the National Institute for Health. The model is a systematic approach that helps guide researchers through the various stages of intervention development, evaluation and implementation. The model emphasizes the iterative and dynamic nature of intervention development and evaluation. Phase 1b aims to refine the intervention to optimize it while retaining the components essential to its power to change, which corresponds to the first part of this framework. The data obtained in the previous phase are therefore taken into account to maximize the intervention's effectiveness. Among other things, qualitative methods to assess the acceptability of the intervention in the target population can be used.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|