Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-510707-11-00 | EU Trial (CTIS) Number | ||
| U1111-1309-9298 | Other Identifier | World Health Organization UTN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Artera | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this prospective, single-arm phase II study is the individualization of both radiotherapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) duration for patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) based on multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) classification. All patients will receive (i) a dose escalation to the prostate via HDR brachytherapy (boost), (ii) twelve months of ADT and (iii) extremely hypofractionated RT to the prostate (5 fractions).
This way, patients in the HypoPro trial will receive a prostate-only dose escalation and benefit from shortening of the ADT compared with current guideline recommendations.
In Cyprus approximately 800 men are newly diagnosed with PCa every year. Prostate cancer caused 6.1 million disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) globally in 2016. The socio-economic burden is high since PCa-related life-time costs are approximately 40,000 per patient with early stage disease at initial diagnosis.
This is a prospective, single-center phase II trial. Patient participants will receive treatment for prostate +-seminal vesicles base high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT) with 15 Gray units (Gy) with minimal dose covering 90% of the prostate (D90) / 1 fraction followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with 25 Gy in 5 Gy / fraction (daily); of the prostate +- seminal vesicles. Concomittant/adjuvant admission of 12 months ADT.
First: 1 fraction HDR BT including fiducial placement Second: 14 ±2 days gap Third: 5 fractions of SBRT within 5 consecutive weekdays For the HypoPro patients, we expect no significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) rates compared to the FLAME trial (2) which one arm treated the patients with moderately-hypofractionated RT to the prostate plus dose escalation to the intraprostatic tumor plus 18-24 months of ADT. Secondary endpoints like metastatic free survival, prostate cancer survival and overall survival will depict the oncologic efficacy in this patient cohort. Thus, the results of this study might be used as the basis for a randomized-controlled trial comparing this dose escalated radiotherapy plus shortened ADT duration with the standard of care (no dose escalated RT, ADT for 2-3 years) in this highly selected treatment group: NCCN high-risk, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) cN0/cM0 and MMAI low/intermediate-risk. Considering the epidemiological importance of the PCa, these results could have a significant socio-economic impact. In parallel a translational research program will address the identification of novel biomarkers to predict the treatment outcome.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single experimental arm | Experimental | Prostate +/-seminal vesicles base HDR BT with 15 Gy (D90) / 1 fraction followed by SBRT with 25 Gy in 5 Gy / fraction (daily); of the prostate +- seminal vesicles. Concomittant/adjuvant admission of 12 months ADT. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) | Drug |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disease-free survival 5 years after treatment | Disease recurrence is defined as PSA failure according to Phoenix, new lesions on PSMA PET and/or MRI imaging or the beginning of any salvage therapy. | Five years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to local or regional failure, after end of RT | Local or regional recurrences have to be confirmed by PSMA-PET or mpMR imaging. For the diagnosis of local failure, verification via biopsy is warranted | Two and five years after RT |
| Metastatic free survival (MFS) after end of RT |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Males with prostate cancer. Eligibility is based on histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Pallari, PhD | Contact | +357 25028690 | elena.pallari@goc.com.cy | |
| Kristis Vevis, PhD | Contact | +357 25208159 | kristis.vevis@goc.com.cy |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| German Oncology Center | Recruiting | Limassol | 4108 | Cyprus |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34588146 | Background | Gorovets D, Hopkins M, Kollmeier M, Moore A, Goel A, Shasha D, Brennan V, McBride S, Cohen G, Damato AL, Zelefsky MJ. Early outcomes of high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with ultra-hypofractionated radiation in higher-risk prostate cancer. Brachytherapy. 2021 Nov-Dec;20(6):1099-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Sep 26. | |
| 39413377 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
MFS is defined as survival time in months from beginning of RT until detection of any new lesion confirmed as metastasis by PSMA-PET/CT or mpMR imaging or death. |
| Two and five years after RT |
| Overall survival (OS) | OS will be measured from the last day of RT to the date of death whatever the cause of death is. Patients who are alive are censored at the date of the most recent follow-up examination. The cause of death of each patient dying during the study will be recorded and reported. | Assessment at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60 months after RT |
| Prostate cancer specific survival (PCSS) | PCSS is defined from the last day of RT until death as most reasonable consequence of progressive prostate cancer, judged by the investigator. | Assessment at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60 months after RT |
| Biochemical failure | Time to biochemical failure after end of RT (phoenix definition) | Two and five years after RT |
| Quality of Life (QoL) | Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EPIC-26: the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-Short form) with score: 0-100 | Assessment at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after randomization (± 14 days for each visit) and at 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months after Ultra-hypofractionated RT - UHF (± 1 month) |
| Quality of Life (QoL) | Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) IIEF-5: The International Index of Erectile Function with score: 0-5 | Assessment at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after randomization (± 14 days for each visit) and at 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months after Ultra-hypofractionated RT - UHF (± 1 month) |
| Genitourinary (GU) acute toxicities | Cumulative acute GU toxicities using the RTOG grading system (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; with grade: 0-5, where 0 implies no toxicity and 5 implies a side effect related to death) | During, at 1 and 3 months after RT |
| GU acute toxicities | Cumulative acute GU toxicities using the CTCAE v5.0 criteria (the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria; with grade: 1-5 where 1 means asymptomatic or mild symptoms and 5 means death related to adverse event) | During, at 1 and 3 months after RT |
| GU chronic toxicities | Cumulative chronic GU toxicities using the RTOG grading system (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; with grade: 0-5, where 0 implies no toxicity and 5 implies a side effect related to death) | During, at 1 and 3 months after RT |
| GU chronic toxicities | Cumulative chronic GU toxicities using the CTCAE v5.0 criteria (the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria; with grade: 1-5 where 1 means asymptomatic or mild symptoms and 5 means death related to adverse event) | during, 1 and 3 months after RT |
| Gastrointestinal (GI) acute toxicities | Cumulative acute GI toxicities using the RTOG grading system (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; with grade: 0-5, where 0 implies no toxicity and 5 implies a side effect related to death) | During, 1 and 3 months after RT |
| GI acute toxicities | Cumulative acute GU toxicities using the CTCAE v5.0 criteria (the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria; with grade: 1-5 where 1 means asymptomatic or mild symptoms and 5 means death related to adverse event) | During, at 1 and 3 months after RT |
| GI chronic toxicities | Cumulative chronic GU toxicities using the RTOG grading system (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; with grade: 0-5, where 0 implies no toxicity and 5 implies a side effect related to death) | Assessment at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after RT |
| GI chronic toxicities | Cumulative acute GU toxicities using the CTCAE v5.0 criteria (the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria; with grade: 1-5 where 1 means asymptomatic or mild symptoms and 5 means death related to adverse event) | Assessment at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after RT |
| Testosterone recovery | Testosterone recovery is to be done through a blood test | Assessment at 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months after randomization (± 14 days for each visit) and at 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months after Ultra-hypofractionated RT - UHF (± 1 month) |
| van As N, Griffin C, Tree A, Patel J, Ostler P, van der Voet H, Loblaw A, Chu W, Ford D, Tolan S, Jain S, Camilleri P, Kancherla K, Frew J, Chan A, Naismith O, Armstrong J, Staffurth J, Martin A, Dayes I, Wells P, Price D, Williamson E, Pugh J, Manning G, Brown S, Burnett S, Hall E. Phase 3 Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 17;391(15):1413-1425. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2403365. |
| 38320143 | Background | Spratt DE, Tang S, Sun Y, Huang HC, Chen E, Mohamad O, Armstrong AJ, Tward JD, Nguyen PL, Lang JM, Zhang J, Mitani A, Simko JP, DeVries S, van der Wal D, Pinckaers H, Monson JM, Campbell HA, Wallace J, Ferguson MJ, Bahary JP, Schaeffer EM, Sandler HM, Tran PT, Rodgers JP, Esteva A, Yamashita R, Feng FY. Artificial Intelligence Predictive Model for Hormone Therapy Use in Prostate Cancer. NEJM Evid. 2023 Aug;2(8):EVIDoa2300023. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300023. Epub 2023 Jun 29. |
| 36813827 | Background | Esteva A, Feng J, van der Wal D, Huang SC, Simko JP, DeVries S, Chen E, Schaeffer EM, Morgan TM, Sun Y, Ghorbani A, Naik N, Nathawani D, Socher R, Michalski JM, Roach M 3rd, Pisansky TM, Monson JM, Naz F, Wallace J, Ferguson MJ, Bahary JP, Zou J, Lungren M, Yeung S, Ross AE; NRG Prostate Cancer AI Consortium; Sandler HM, Tran PT, Spratt DE, Pugh S, Feng FY, Mohamad O. Author Correction: Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials. NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Feb 22;6(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00769-z. No abstract available. |
| 33471548 | Background | Kerkmeijer LGW, Groen VH, Pos FJ, Haustermans K, Monninkhof EM, Smeenk RJ, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zijp J, van Vulpen M, Draulans C, van den Bergh L, Isebaert S, van der Heide UA. Focal Boost to the Intraprostatic Tumor in External Beam Radiotherapy for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: Results From the FLAME Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):787-796. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02873. Epub 2021 Jan 20. |
| 40645505 | Derived | Zamboglou C, Doncker W, Christoforou AT, Arcangeli S, Berlin A, Blanchard P, Bauman G, Campi R, Castro E, Choudhury A, Pra AD, Draulans C, Desai N, Ferentinos K, Francolini G, Gillessen S, Grosu AL, Rivas JG, Hoelscher T, Hruby G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Kamran S, Kasivisvanathan V, Kishan AU, Kounnis V, Loblaw A, Martin J, Mastroleo F, Merseburger AS, Miszczyk M, Mohamad O, Ost P, Papatsoris A, Peeken JC, Sanguedolce F, Sargos P, Schmidt-Hegemann N, Seibert TM, Shelan M, Siva S, Soeterik TFW, Spratt DE, Stenzl A, Strouthos I, Sutera P, Supiot S, Tilki D, Tran PT, Tree AC, Tward J, Urun Y, Vapiwala N, Waddle MR, Wegener E, Zilli T, Murthy V, Thieme AH, Spohn S. oDigital pathology biomarkers for guiding radiotherapy-based treatment concepts in prostate cancer - a systematic review and expert consensus. Radiother Oncol. 2025 Sep;210:111039. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111039. Epub 2025 Jul 9. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000726 | Androgen Antagonists |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006727 | Hormone Antagonists |
| D006730 | Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists |
| D045505 | Physiological Effects of Drugs |
| D020228 | Pharmacologic Actions |
| D020164 | Chemical Actions and Uses |
Not provided
Not provided