Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Babylon University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Checking the effectiveness of the infiltration technique of local anesthetic agent as an alternative to inferior dental nerve block during tooth extraction
Patients who need their Mandibular first Molar to be removed under local anaesthesia. The first group will receive 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as lingual and buccal infiltration. In comparison, the second group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000). Pain will be measured para-operatively using a verbal rating scale.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Block | Active Comparator | This group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000) for tooth extraction. |
|
| Infiltration | Experimental | This group will receive 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as lingual and buccal infiltration for tooth extraction |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infiltration with Articain 4% | Procedure | The experimental group of patients that are diagnosed for tooth extraction of mandibular 1st. molar will undergo extraction using an infiltration technique for local anaesthesia. In contrast to the conventional group that will receive Inferior alveolar nerve block |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Verbal Pain Rating Scale | Pain during tooth extraction will be measured immediately after the procedure is completed using a verbal rating scale. The zero rate will be given when the patient feels no pain; the rating degree will increase as the pain severity becomes more severe. According to the following scale: 0 No hurt
| during the intervention/procedure/surgery |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of Dentistry, University of Babylon | Hillah | Babylon | 00964 | Iraq | ||
| College of Dentistry/University of Babylon |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30417227 | Background | Bataineh AB, Nusair YM, Al-Rahahleh RQ. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Aug;23(8):3239-3248. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2738-x. Epub 2018 Nov 12. | |
| 37732279 | Background | Madden VJ, Kamerman P, Leake HB, Catley MJ, Heathcote LC, Moseley GL. The Sensation and Pain Rating Scale: easy to use, clear to interpret, and responsive to clinical change. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Jan 9:2023.09.08.23295128. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.08.23295128. |
Not provided
Not provided
Study DATA will be provided on request
after research publishment
other researchers
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000765 | Anesthesia, Conduction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000758 | Anesthesia |
| D000760 | Anesthesia and Analgesia |
Not provided
Not provided
The interventional group will undergo tooth extraction under the infiltration anaesthesia technique
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block | Procedure | This group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000) for tooth extraction. |
|
|
| Hillah |
| Babylon |
| 00964 |
| Iraq |