Cosmetic Results With Tissue Adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) vs. Subdermal Sutures in Cesarean Section: Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Cosmetic Results With Tissue Adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) vs. Subdermal Sutures in Cesarean Section: Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Morbidity associated with post-cesarean wound closure, including cosmetically unfavorable scarring, is a significant concern in obstetrics, impacting patient satisfaction and recovery. Recent advances have introduced the use of tissue adhesives, such as 2-octylcyanoacrylate, which promise to improve cosmetic outcomes and reduce postoperative complications. This study will evaluate different tissue adhesive application schedules, keeping the total dose constant, to determine whether the method of application influences cosmetic results and the incidence of postoperative complications
In Honduras, as in many parts of the world, cesarean section is a common obstetric practice. The choice of wound closure method in this procedure has significant implications not only in terms of the patient's physical health, but also in her psychological and aesthetic well-being. The scar resulting from a cesarean section can have a lasting impact on a woman's perception of her own body, affecting her self-esteem and quality of life.
Historically, in Honduras, the use of subdermal sutures with nylon thread has been preferred for the closure of post-cesarean section wounds. However, with advances in medical technology, tissue adhesives have emerged as a promising alternative, potentially offering a better cosmetic outcome, faster application, and more comfortable recovery for the patient.
This study is crucial in the Honduran context for several reasons:
Objective: To evaluate the effects on morbidity and postoperative cosmetic outcomes of the use of tissue adhesive versus subdermal sutures in Pfannenstiel-type cesarean sections.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: