Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NL88017.078.24 | Registry Identifier | CCMO |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rationale: The randomized trial NADINA has demonstrated that neoadjuvant treatment with nivolumab with ipilimumab improves event-free survival (EFS) in patients with macroscopic resectable stage III melanoma. In this study, therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) was standard of care, showing that patients achieving a major pathological response (MPR, i.e., ≤10% residual viable tumor bed) have an excellent outcome (EFS and Distant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS)). The PRADO trial indicated that the MPR definition can also be revealed from a surrogate lymph node response, the index lymph node (ILN), allowing sparing the extensive surgery in MPR patients. In these MPR patients the DMFS was 100% after 1 year and 98% after 2 years, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 95% after 1 year and 93% after 2 years. Given that TLND is associated with morbidity and has a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and healthcare costs, this study aims to prospectively investigate the safety of omitting TLND in patients who have an MPR within the ILN after neoadjuvant immunotherapy.
Objectives: To investigate whether TLND can be safely omitted in patients with macroscopic resectable stage III (B/C/D) melanoma achieving an MPR within the ILN upon neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab and nivolumab).
Study design: This study is a prospective, single-arm phase 2 nationwide multicenter trial.
Study population:
Inclusion criteria for study participants are as follows:
Intervention: Omitting TLND in patients who achieve an MPR in the ILN following neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab.
Main study endpoints: The two coprimary endpoints are 2-year Local Recurrence Free Survival (LRFS) and 2-year DMFS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omitting TLND | Experimental | Omitting TLND in patients who achieve an MPR in the ILN following neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omitting TLND | Procedure | Omitting TLND in patients who achieve an MPR in the index node following neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Local Recurrence Free Survival (LRFS) | LRFS, as defined as time from removal of the index lymph node (ILN) until local (in basin) recurrence in the MPR group. Accepting a local relapse of 20%. | 2 years after inclusion |
| Distant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS) | DMFS assessed in the MPR group, as defined as time from the start of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, nivolumab with ipilimumab, until the first occurrence of distant metastasis. Accepting DMFS 3% lower than the 2 years DMFS of the NADINA trial | 2 years after inclusion |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), EORTC QLQ C30 | Description of the changes in HR-QoL scores from baseline to follow-up visits, measured by validated questionnaires using EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30). The EORTC QLQ C30 is scored on 4 point Likert-scales: "Not at all", "A little", "Quite a bit", and "Very much." | 3 years after inclusion |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drik Grünhagen, MD, PhD | Contact | +31 10 704 19 02 | d.grunhagen@erasmusmc.nl |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erasmus MC | Recruiting | Rotterdam | South Holland | 3015GD | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38828984 | Background | Blank CU, Lucas MW, Scolyer RA, van de Wiel BA, Menzies AM, Lopez-Yurda M, Hoeijmakers LL, Saw RPM, Lijnsvelt JM, Maher NG, Pulleman SM, Gonzalez M, Torres Acosta A, van Houdt WJ, Lo SN, Kuijpers AMJ, Spillane A, Klop WMC, Pennington TE, Zuur CL, Shannon KF, Seinstra BA, Rawson RV, Haanen JBAG, Ch'ng S, Naipal KAT, Stretch J, van Thienen JV, Rtshiladze MA, Wilgenhof S, Kapoor R, Meerveld-Eggink A, Grijpink-Ongering LG, van Akkooi ACJ, Reijers ILM, Gyorki DE, Grunhagen DJ, Speetjens FM, Vliek SB, Placzke J, Spain L, Stassen RC, Amini-Adle M, Lebbe C, Faries MB, Robert C, Ascierto PA, van Rijn R, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Piersma D, van der Westhuizen A, Vreugdenhil G, Aarts MJB, Stevense-den Boer MAM, Atkinson V, Khattak M, Andrews MC, van den Eertwegh AJM, Boers-Sonderen MJ, Hospers GAP, Carlino MS, de Groot JB, Kapiteijn E, Suijkerbuijk KPM, Rutkowski P, Sandhu S, van der Veldt AAM, Long GV. Neoadjuvant Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Resectable Stage III Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2024 Nov 7;391(18):1696-1708. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2402604. Epub 2024 Jun 2. | |
| 35661157 |
Not provided
Not provided
We have decided not to share de-identified individual participant data, as the dataset is intended for exclusive use by the primary research group. Sharing the data with researchers outside of this group is not aligned with the original goals and agreements of the study.
Should there be a need for collaboration or data sharing in the future, we will evaluate this in consultation with the relevant parties.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008545 | Melanoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018358 | Neuroendocrine Tumors |
| D017599 | Neuroectodermal Tumors |
| D009373 | Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
Omitting TLND in patients who achieve an MPR in the ILN following neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Index node procedure | Procedure | Index node procedure |
|
| Evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), FACT-M | Description of the changes in HR-QoL scores from baseline to follow-up visits, measured by validated questionnaires using Melanoma Surgery Specific subscale of the FACT-M. The FACT-M is scored on a 5 point Likert-scale: "Not at all", "A little bit", "Somewhat", "Quite a bit", and "Very much." | 3 years after inclusion |
| Description of the pathological response rates in the ILN | The pathologic response rate is categorized into pathologic complete response (pCR), near-pCR, major pathologic response (MPR), pathologic partial response (pPR), pathologic no response (pNR), according to International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC) criteria. | 1 year after inclusion |
| Evaluation of the surgical morbidity, CTCAE v5 | Description of the incidence and severity of post-surgical complications according to CTCAE v5 | 2 year after inclusion |
| Evaluation of the surgical morbidity, Clavien Dindo | Description of the incidence and severity of post-surgical complications according to Clavien Dindo | 2 year after inclusion |
| Radiological evaluation of the index lymph node | Calculate Concordance rates between radiological and pathological response (pCR, pPR, pNR) in the ILN | 1 year after inclusion |
| Proportion of patients undergoing therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) | Description of the proportion of patients undergoing TLND stratified by MPR and non-MPR status | 5 years after inclusion |
| Melanoma specific survival | Description of the Melanoma specific survival, as calculated time from the date of start of neoadjuvant therapy to the date of death due to melanoma | 5 years after inclusion |
| Overall survival | Description of the overall survival, as calculated time from the date of start of neoadjuvant therapy to the date of death due to melanoma or any cause | 5 years after inclusion |
| Background |
| Reijers ILM, Menzies AM, van Akkooi ACJ, Versluis JM, van den Heuvel NMJ, Saw RPM, Pennington TE, Kapiteijn E, van der Veldt AAM, Suijkerbuijk KPM, Hospers GAP, Rozeman EA, Klop WMC, van Houdt WJ, Sikorska K, van der Hage JA, Grunhagen DJ, Wouters MW, Witkamp AJ, Zuur CL, Lijnsvelt JM, Torres Acosta A, Grijpink-Ongering LG, Gonzalez M, Jozwiak K, Bierman C, Shannon KF, Ch'ng S, Colebatch AJ, Spillane AJ, Haanen JBAG, Rawson RV, van de Wiel BA, van de Poll-Franse LV, Scolyer RA, Boekhout AH, Long GV, Blank CU. Personalized response-directed surgery and adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in high-risk stage III melanoma: the PRADO trial. Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1178-1188. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01851-x. Epub 2022 Jun 5. |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009380 | Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue |
| D018326 | Nevi and Melanomas |
| D012878 | Skin Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |