Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and economic benefits of Cyclical Pressure Topical Wound Oxygen (TWO2) Therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Participants will utilize standard of care (SOC) multilayer compression dressings with an inactive wound contact layer. Following a 2-week run-in period with SOC and after meeting all eligibility criteria, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio with TWO2 therapy or sham control therapy plus SOC. Participants will enter the intervention period of up to 16-weeks, followed by a long-term follow-up period of 52 weeks post randomization.
The full effect of Venous leg ulcers (VLU) on society is poorly understood. While chronic VLU are not considered to have a significant impact on mortality, the burden on patients, caregivers, healthcare systems and related economies cannot be underestimated. VLU affects 2% of the world's population, with 60% progressing to chronic wounds. (1) The reported range of VLU incidence is 0.12 - 1.69% and with a prevalence 0.3 - 1.33%. (2; 3) VLUs are a result of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and found to be more prevalent in females than males, with both primary (genetic) and secondary causes that result in valvular incompetence that is further exacerbated by obesity and immobility. (4) With the projected growth of aging and increasingly obese and unhealthy societies, both in the developed and developing world, the anticipated incidence of VLU is expected to rise significantly. (1; 5; 6) It has been well established that the standard of care (SOC) for VLU is the application of conventional compression dressing (CCD), as the successful management of venous hypertension is key to healing VLU. Maintaining a mobile blood flow and delivering oxygen and nutrients to tissues is essential to healing as well as preserving the integrity of skin reducing threat of developing a recurrent VLU.
The role of oxygen in wound healing has been extensively studied. An animal study by Fries et al in 2005 demonstrated that the application of oxygen in partial pressures above those delivered by a well-functioning arterial system, to wounded tissue, resulted in faster healing and more durable tissue. (19) Oxygen is also essential in fighting infection, potentiating the use of antibiotics and upregulating growth factors. (20; 21) A study by Tawfick and Sultan in 2012 demonstrated a significant benefit in healing VLU when both oxygen and cycling compression were employed simultaneously. Utilizing Topical Wound Oxygen (TWO2) therapy™, TWO2 was demonstrated to be superior to SOC, 76% vs 46% healing at 12 weeks (n = 30/65; P < .0001), with low recurrence rates for patients followed up to three years, 6% vs 47%. Further noteworthy results from this study were the reduction of pain, 8 to 3 in 13 days (on a numerical rating scale) and subjects whose wounds were infected with MRSA demonstrated elimination 46% vs 0% at week 5 (P <.001). (22)
All subjects will use the TWO2/Sham device for a minimum of 120 minutes a day in their home (where the infrastructure supports remote therapy), 5 times a week for the treatment phase of up to 16 weeks. Monitoring of the wound will take place with bi-weekly clinic visits to assess safety, compliance, wound progression/deterioration, wound photographs and measurements.
The maximum duration for participation in the trial is 52 weeks (+/- 2 weeks). During the follow-up phase, subjects will receive standard care according to the clinician's recommendation and will be asked not to participate in another wound care trial during this period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topical Wound Oxygen Therapy Device | Active Comparator | Topical Wound Oxygen (TWO2) device in combination with the extremity chamber delivers oxygen and cyclical compression to the wound site. The sealed environment created by the extremity chamber is filled with oxygen for a minimum of 120 minutes, 5 times a week over multilayered compression dressings and a wound contact layer. |
|
| Sham Control Topical Wound Oxygen (TWO2) device | Sham Comparator | A Sham Control Topical Wound Oxygen (TWO2) device in combination with the extremity chamber that does not deliver oxygen and cyclical compression to the wound site. The sealed environment created by the extremity chamber is filled with room air for a minimum of 120 minutes, 5 times a week over multilayered compression dressings and a wound contact layer. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topical Wound Oxygen Therapy | Device | The active intervention is the application of the Topical Wound Oxygen device that supplies cyclical oxygen pressure directly to the wound site within a sealed environment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of complete wound closure within 16 weeks with the use of Topical Wound Oxygen Therapy (TWO2) | Percentage incidence of complete wound closure defined as 100% skin re-epithelialization without the need for wound dressing that is confirmed by 2 consecutive study visits 2 weeks apart. | From Baseline to16 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Area Reduction (PAR) | Change in wound area will be documented bi-weekly by the use of digital photography and wound mapping | Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 up to 16 weeks (± 2 days) |
| Incidence of complete wound closure at 12 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
• Known allergy to any of the protocol-stipulated treatments, or non-tolerance of multilayer, multicomponent compression therapy
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Despina Herodotou, MRCPod, DABPMi | Contact | 1-760-431-4700 | despi.herodotou@aotinc.net |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mike Griffiths, DProf, DMS, CRT, FCMI | AOTI Ltd. | Study Chair |
| Anil Hingorani, MD | Principal Investigator | |
| Wael Tawfick, MB.BCH, MRCSI. |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vascular Institute of New York | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31619393 | Background | Frykberg RG, Franks PJ, Edmonds M, Brantley JN, Teot L, Wild T, Garoufalis MG, Lee AM, Thompson JA, Reach G, Dove CR, Lachgar K, Grotemeyer D, Renton SC; TWO2 Study Group. A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cyclical Topical Wound Oxygen (TWO2) Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: The TWO2 Study. Diabetes Care. 2020 Mar;43(3):616-624. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0476. Epub 2019 Oct 16. | |
| 23223182 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014647 | Varicose Ulcer |
| D014456 | Ulcer |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D014648 | Varicose Veins |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D007871 | Leg Ulcer |
| D012883 | Skin Ulcer |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomized, Double Blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial
Not provided
Not provided
The Trial Monitor will be blinded to the participant's allocated intervention.
| Sham Control Topical Wound Oxygen | Device | The sham control intervention is the application of Topical Wound Oxygen device that supplies topical room air to the wound site within a sealed environment. |
|
Incidence of complete wound closure defined as 100% skin re-epithelialization without the need for wound dressing that is confirmed by 2 consecutive study visits 2 weeks apart.
| From Baseline to12 weeks |
| Incidence of complete wound closure at 52 weeks | Incidence of complete wound closure defined as 100% skin re-epithelialization without the need for wound dressing that is confirmed by 2 consecutive study visits 2 weeks apart. | From week 16 to 52 weeks |
| Time to complete wound closure | Healing difference over Time will be assessed over a 16-week period | Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 up to 16 weeks (± 2 days), 20, 26, 52 weeks (± 2 weeks) |
| Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score | Pain scores documented on a weekly basis measured using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, with zero (0) indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst possible pain. | Baseline weekly up to 16 weeks (±2 days) |
| Incidence of recurrence | Wounds documented as "healed" will be followed for incidence of recurrence. Count of wound recurrences of healed wounds. For healed wounds, VLU recurrence was collected via phone calls and subjects at follow up timelines. | From Baseline up to week 16, week 20, 26 (± 1 week), 52 (± 2 weeks) |
| Incidence of Adverse Events at 16 weeks | Total number of different types of adverse events in participants who reported with any untoward medical event | From Baseline to16 weeks |
| Incidence of Serious Adverse Events at 16 weeks | Total number of different types of serious adverse events in participants who reported that:
| From Baseline to16 weeks |
| Incidence of Serious Adverse Events at 52 weeks | Total number of different types of serious adverse events in participants who reported that:
| From 16 to 52 weeks |
| Change in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) | Mean change in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) from baseline to week 16. VCSS assesses nine common signs/symptoms of venous disease and each item is scored individually with a minimum score of "0" and maximum score of "3". The individual items are added together to assess change from baseline. Higher scores mean worst outcome. | From Baseline to 16 weeks |
| Elimination of Infection | Wound cultures will be taken at the Baseline visit then again at week 6. Wounds defined as "infected" at the baseline visit and "not infection" at weeks 6, are documented as wound infection elimination. | From Baseline to week 6 |
| Change in Health-related Quality of Life (Venous Leg Ulcer Quality of life Questionnaire ~ (VLU-QoL-34)) | Mean difference in change in Venous Leg Ulcer Quality of life Questionnaire ~ (VLU-QoL-34) from baseline to 16 weeks. Crude subscale scores for each group are not shown (each crude subscale is scored 1 to 5 at baseline and 16 weeks); higher mean differences in change from baseline to 16 weeks within groups indicate greater change on the subscales for that group. | From Baseline to week 8, up to week 16 (± 2 days) |
| Emotional distress | The emotional distress will be assessed through the total score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, comprising both anxiety and depression scales (HADS; Pais-Ribeiro et al., 2007). Scores range between 0 and 42, with higher results indicating higher levels of distress. | From Baseline to week 8, up to week 16 (± 2 days) |
| Anxiety symptoms | The anxious symptomatology will be assessed through the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Pais-Ribeiro et al., 2007). Scores range between 0 and 21, with higher results indicating higher levels of anxiety symptoms. | From Baseline to week 8, up to week 16 (± 2 days) |
| Depression | The depressive symptomatology will be assessed through the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Pais-Ribeiro et al., 2007). Scores range between 0 and 21, with higher results indicating higher levels of depression symptoms. | From Baseline to week 8, up to week 16 (± 2 days) |
| Change in Health-related Quality of Life (EuroQol-5D 3L) | Mean difference in change measured by EuroQol 5D (EQ5D 3L) from baseline to 16 weeks. Crude health state scores for each group are not shown (health state is scored 0 to 100 at baseline and 16 weeks); higher mean differences in change from baseline to 16 weeks within groups indicate greater change on health state for that group. | From Baseline to week 8, up to week 16 (± 2 days) |
| University of Galway |
| Principal Investigator |
| Background |
| Tawfick WA, Sultan S. Technical and clinical outcome of topical wound oxygen in comparison to conventional compression dressings in the management of refractory nonhealing venous ulcers. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013 Jan;47(1):30-7. doi: 10.1177/1538574412467684. Epub 2012 Dec 5. |
| 11510598 | Background | Fowkes FG, Evans CJ, Lee AJ. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic venous insufficiency. Angiology. 2001 Aug;52 Suppl 1:S5-15. doi: 10.1177/0003319701052001S02. |
| D012871 |
| Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |