Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This non-interventional clinical investigation is initiated for the purpose of long-term Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) and the follow-up time of patients is expected to span from 6 months to >20 years in function. It will collect and evaluate clinical data on the safety and performance of the OPRA™ Implant System when used on transhumeral amputees and within the scope of the intended use.
All subjects that will be enrolled in this investigation should have been treated with the OPRA Implant System for a transhumeral unilateral or bilateral amputation and completed the second stage surgery (S2) and had at least 6 months of usage experience with the OPRA Implant System before enrolment.
This retrospective, non-interventional, clinical investigation is designed as a multicenter, multinational, cohort investigation for long-term follow-up of safety and efficacy endpoints. The investigation will also include prospective visit(s) for enrollment of subjects and collection of present data on device functionality and the use of the device.
No control group or comparator will be used in this investigation.
All patient reported outcome questionnaires used in the investigation will be available at the investigation site for completion by the subjects during one of the subjects' visits to the site. Depending on the subjects' preferences it will also be possible to provide those questionnaires to the subjects, through use of regular mail, email or through an electronic Patient Reported Outcome system (ePRO). It will be possible for the subjects to complete the questionnaires either on paper, electronically or over phone, depending on their preferences.
Preferably, the subjects prosthesis functional tests should be performed as part of the follow-up visit at the site. The tests may also be performed remotely, depending on subjects' preferences. If done remotely, this will require the functionality test being performed during a videoconference with the test administrator. No photos or video-recordings (if conducted according to the sites normal practice) of the performed tests will be part of the investigation documentation, only the related medical record notes will be used as source data for those parameters.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uni/bilaterally transhumeral amputated | Other | OPRA transhumeral |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPRA transhumeral | Device | Skeletal anchorage of amputation prostheses. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant Safety and Effectivness | Implant safety: * Implant survival rate 2 years post implant surgery. Calculated the number of implants still in situ at time of the follow-up visit, 2 years after completion of implant surgery divided by the number of implants at risk. Effectivness: * Change in prosthetic use. Measured as time prosthesis used before implant surgery compared with time prosthesis used at time of the follow-up visit. Categorized as:
| 2 years post implant surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant Safety | • Implant survival rate, after 6 months, and 1-, 5-, 10- and ˃10-years post implant surgery. Calculated as the number of implants still in situ after 6 months, 1-, 5-, 10- and ˃10-years after completion of surgery divided by the number of implants at risk | More than 10 years |
| Implant Safety |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Medical Officer, MD | Contact | +46 706753499 | karin.ganlov@integrum.se | |
| Head of Clinical Operations, M.Sc | Contact | +46766015026 | johan.blechert@integrum.se |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Alfred Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Melbourne | Victoria | 3004 | Australia |
Data specified in the outcome meassures
2026
The participating investigators will have full access of the Clinical Investigation Report as part of the study file for archiving. After main publication is performed, individual investigators will have access to the complete data on request.
Not provided
As described in the title this is a long term safety and efficacy follow up on subjects that received an transhumeral implant uni/bilaterlly before Jan 2024, and mainly looking at Retrospective data gathered from medical records.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
• Implant survival time Measured as the time from completion of surgery to implant loss or time of last observation without known implant loss. |
| More than 10 years |
| Implant safety | • Presence of biological complications Measured as the number of the following complications taking place from time of surgery to time of implant loss or time of last observation without known implant loss:
| More than 10 years |
| Implant safety | • Presence of Mechanical complications Mechanical complications related to implant, abutment or abutment screw. Measured as the number of mechanical complications taking place from time of surgery to implant loss our time of last observation without known implant loss, presented per category:
| More than 10 years |
| Implant effectiveness | • Functionality evaluations. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) Set of questions, score 1-5. Higher score worse. | 6 months, 1yr, 2yrs, 5yrs, 10yrs, > 10yrs |
| Implant effectiveness | Funtionallity evaluation. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurements Information System(PROMIS) - Upper Extremity, Short Form 7a. Seven questions, score 5-1. Higher score better. | 6 months, 1yr, 2yrs, 5yrs, 10yrs, >10yrs |
| Implant effectivness | Functionality evaluation. Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP). Funtionality test performed, time meassured. Calculated score 0-100. Higher score better. | 6 months, 1yr, 2yrs, 5yrs, 10yrs, >10yrs |
| Implant effectiveness | • Physical evaluation - Short Form (36) Health Survey Eleven questions. Various alternatives. | Through study completion, an avarage of approximately 1 month. |
| Implant effectivness | Physical evaluation. Range of Motion Test. Degree of movement around a joint. Higher score better | Through study completion, an avarage of approximately 1 month. |
| Implant effectivness. | Physical examination. Pain questions. Numeric Range Scale 0-10. High scores mean worse. | Through study completion, an avarage of approximately 1 month. |
| Implant effectiveness | • Satisfaction of use. Prosthetic use satisfaction. Numeric rating scale, 0-10. High score are better. | Through study completion, an avarage of approximately 1 month. |
| Implant effectivness | Satisfaction of use. OPRA™ implant system satisfaction. Numeric rating scale, 0-10. High score are better. | Through study completion, an avarage of approximately 1 month. |
| Implant effectiveness | • Level of embodiment of the Prosthesis Numerical Rating Scale. Six personal questions. Score 0-10. Second question is 0 better. For the five other question 10 is better. | Through study completion, an avarage of approximately 1 month. |
| Medical University of Vienna Clinical laboratory for bionic limb reconstruction Währinger Gürtel 18-20 1090 Vienna, AUSTRIA | Recruiting | Vienna | 1090 | Austria |
|
| University Hospital Ghent, UX Ghent | Not yet recruiting | Ghent | 9000 | Belgium |
|
| Hannover Medical School | Not yet recruiting | Hanover | 30625 | Germany |
|
| University Hospital Tübing | Not yet recruiting | Tübingen | 72076 | Germany |
|
| University Medical Center Groningen | Not yet recruiting | Groningen | 9700 | Netherlands |
|