The Comparative Efficacy of Standard Treatment Plus Ribavirin vs Standard Treatment Alone in Preventing Clinically Significant Hemorrhage in Patients With Dengue Fever: A Double-blind, Randomized Control Trial
The Comparative Efficacy of Standard Treatment Plus Ribavirin vs Standard Treatment Alone in Preventing Clinically Significant Hemorrhage in Patients With Dengue Fever: A Double-blind, Randomized Control Trial
This study investigates the comparative efficacy of standard treatment plus Ribavirin versus standard treatment alone in preventing clinically significant hemorrhage among patients diagnosed with dengue fever. It is a double-blind, randomized control trial aimed at determining whether the addition of Ribavirin improves clinical outcomes, particularly reducing bleeding events.
Dengue fever, a significant public health concern, presents varying severity from asymptomatic to life-threatening complications such as hemorrhage or shock. This study evaluates the effectiveness of Ribavirin when combined with standard treatment in mitigating severe bleeding complications in dengue patients. Conducted at multiple public sector hospitals in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the trial employs a rigorous methodology, including block randomization, double-blinding, and predefined eligibility criteria. Outcomes include changes in bleeding grades, platelet counts, acute-phase reactants, and hospital stay length. The findings aim to inform policy decisions and enhance dengue fever management protocols.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: