Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the direct warming method for frozen embryo transfers (FET) can improve live birth and pregnancy outcomes in women aged 18-45 undergoing IVF treatments. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare the direct warming method to the conventional multi-step method to see if the former leads to better pregnancy outcomes and reduced procedural time.
Participants will:
This clinical trial explores a novel direct warming method for frozen embryo transfer (FET), aimed at improving both clinical and operational outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). The method was designed to simplify and accelerate the embryo thawing process, reducing the time needed for thawing while eliminating the use of cryoprotectants commonly required in conventional thawing methods. This innovation has the potential to offer a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to standard FET procedures.
The primary focus of this trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the direct warming method against the conventional multi-step thawing process. In particular, the study seeks to determine whether the new method yields comparable or superior outcomes in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and live birth rate (LBR), while also assessing its overall cost-effectiveness.
Study Design and Technical Details
This study employs a randomized controlled design, with participants being allocated into either the intervention group (direct warming method) or the control group (conventional multi-step thawing). The direct warming method streamlines the thawing process to just 3 minutes, in contrast to the conventional method, which requires multiple stages and takes approximately 20 minutes. By using only an embryo culture medium without cryoprotectants, the direct warming method reduces both complexity and potential risks associated with handling and cryoprotectant toxicity.
Key Objectives
Expected Impact and Innovation
The direct warming method challenges the traditional multi-step thawing approach, offering a faster and simpler alternative without compromising clinical outcomes. By minimizing the need for cryoprotectants and reducing the complexity of the thawing process, the new method is expected to enhance the overall efficiency of FET procedures while maintaining or improving pregnancy success rates. Additionally, the cost and time savings associated with the direct warming method may make it a viable option for IVF clinics worldwide, driving standardization and consistency across clinical settings.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Warming method | Experimental | The blastocyst designated for thawing will be placed in a pre-warmed, direct warming medium for one minute. Afterward, the embryo is transferred into an embryo culture medium within a time-lapse system, where it remains until the patient is ready for the embryo transfer procedure. This direct warming method significantly reduces the total procedure time to approximately 3 minutes, making it about ten times faster than the conventional multi-step thawing method. |
|
| Conventional multi-step thawing method | Placebo Comparator | In the conventional multi-step thawing method, vitrified blastocysts are sequentially thawed using a series of pre-warmed thawing, dilution, and washing solutions. The blastocyst is first placed in a thawing solution for 1-3 minutes, followed by immersion in a dilution solution for 4-6 minutes to reduce cryoprotectant concentration. Finally, the blastocyst is transferred to a washing solution for 5-10 minutes for rehydration. The entire process takes approximately 30 minutes, after which the embryo is placed into an embryo culture medium in a time-lapse system until it is ready for embryo transfer. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Warming Method | Other | This intervention involves thawing vitrified blastocysts using a simplified, one-step direct warming method. The blastocyst is placed in a pre-warmed embryo culture medium for approximately one minute, then transferred directly into the embryo culture medium within a time-lapse system until ready for uterine transfer. The total thawing process takes approximately three minutes, reducing the duration and complexity of the procedure compared to conventional methods. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Pregnancy Rate | Number of participants with at least one intrauterine gestational sac observed on ultrasound at 6-8 weeks of gestation following embryo transfer. | 6-8 weeks post embryo transfer |
| Ongoing Pregnancy Rate (OPR) | Number of participants with a viable intrauterine pregnancy observed on ultrasound at 12 weeks of gestation. | 12 weeks post embryo transfer |
| Live Birth Rate (LBR) | Number of participants who deliver a live infant after 24 weeks of gestation. | At delivery, approximately 9 months post embryo transfer |
| Cost-Effectiveness | A comparative analysis of the total costs, including costs of consumables (e.g., warming mediums, storage devices) and staff labor hours, associated with the direct warming method compared to the conventional multi-step thawing method. Costs will be measured in USD and analyzed at the end of the study period. | At the end of the study, approximately 4 years. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subgroup Analysis of Warming Medium | Analysis of the clinical differences between brands of warming mediums assessing their impact on embryo survival rate. | Throughout the study period, approximately 4 years. |
| Subgroup Analysis of Storage Devices |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yiu Leung D Chan, DPhil | Contact | (852) 3505 3199 | drdcyl16@cuhk.edu.hk | |
| Waner Wu, MPhil | Contact | (852) 3505 1764 | wanerwu@link.cuhk.edu.hk |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Chinese University of Hong Kong | Shatin, New Territories | Hong Kong SAR | Hong Kong |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34845576 | Background | Canosa S, Parmegiani L, Charrier L, Gennarelli G, Garello C, Granella F, Evangelista F, Monelli G, Guidetti D, Revelli A, Filicori M, Bongioanni F. Are commercial warming kits interchangeable for vitrified human blastocysts? Further evidence for the adoption of a Universal Warming protocol. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jan;39(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02364-1. Epub 2021 Nov 30. | |
| 38615016 |
Not provided
Not provided
IPD will not be shared due to concerns regarding participant confidentiality and privacy. Additionally, the informed consent process did not include provisions for the sharing of individual-level data with third parties. Furthermore, local regulatory restrictions limit the ability to distribute sensitive health data outside the study team.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study uses a parallel assignment model where participants are randomized into two groups: one group will receive the novel direct warming method, and the other group will undergo the conventional multi-step thawing method. Both groups will be followed to compare clinical outcomes such as pregnancy rates, live birth rates, and cost-effectiveness.
Not provided
Not provided
In this trial, participants and outcomes assessors will be masked to ensure unbiased results. The embryologists performing the thawing procedures will not be masked, as they are directly involved in applying the assigned thawing method (either the direct warming method or the conventional multi-step method). Additionally, the research staff responsible for enrolling participants will also remain blinded to group assignments to maintain allocation concealment. However, participants who are determined not to be pregnant after embryo transfer may be informed of their group assignment at that time. However, if a pregnancy is confirmed, participants will not be informed of their group assignment until after delivery or in the event of pregnancy loss.
|
|
| Conventional Multi-step Thawing Method | Other | This intervention involves thawing vitrified blastocysts using a standard, multi-step process. The procedure includes sequential exposure of the blastocyst to different thawing solutions containing varying concentrations of cryoprotectants, followed by its transfer into an embryo culture medium in a time-lapse system. The overall process takes approximately 10-30 minutes. |
|
Analysis of the clinical differences between brands of Storage Devices assessing their impact on embryo survival rate.
| Throughout the study period, approximately 4 years. |
| The CUHK Medical centre | Shatin,NT | Hong Kong SAR | Hong Kong |
|
| The Homerton Hospital | London | London | United Kingdom |
|
| Background |
| Wang SF, Seifer DB. Age-related increase in live-birth rates of first frozen thaw embryo versus first fresh transfer in initial assisted reproductive technology cycles without PGT. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Apr 13;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01210-0. |
| 30074129 | Background | Parmegiani L, Beilby KH, Arnone A, Bernardi S, Maccarini AM, Nardi E, Cognigni GE, Filicori M. Testing the efficacy and efficiency of a single "universal warming protocol" for vitrified human embryos: prospective randomized controlled trial and retrospective longitudinal cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Oct;35(10):1887-1895. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1276-4. Epub 2018 Aug 3. |
| Background | Schiewe MC, Anderson RE. Vitrification: the pioneering past to current trends and perspectives of cryopreserving human embryos, gametes and reproductive tissue. Journal of Biorepository Science for Applied Medicine. 2017;5:57-68. |
| 38472563 | Background | Jiang VS, Cherouveim P, Naert MN, Dimitriadis I, Souter I, Bormann CL. Live birth outcomes following single-step blastocyst warming technique - optimizing efficiency without impacting live birth rates. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 May;41(5):1193-1202. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03069-x. Epub 2024 Mar 13. |
| 38359734 | Background | Liebermann J, Hrvojevic K, Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Brohammer R, Wagner Y, Susralski A, Jasulaitis S, Chan S, Takhsh E, Uhler M. Fast and furious: pregnancy outcome with one-step rehydration in the warming protocol for human blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 Apr;48(4):103731. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103731. Epub 2023 Nov 23. |
| Background | Manns JN, Katz S, Whelan J, Patrick JL, Holt T, Merline AM, et al. VALIDATION OF A NEW, ULTRA-FAST BLASTOCYST WARMING TECHNIQUE REDUCES WARMING TIMES TO 1 MIN AND YIELDS SIMILAR SURVIVAL AND RE-EXPANSION COMPARED TO BLASTOCYSTS WARMED USING A STANDARD METHOD. Fertility and Sterility. |
| 37041370 | Background | Yan G, Yao Y, Yang W, Lu L, Wang L, Zhao D, Zhao S. An all-37 degrees C thawing method improves the clinical outcomes of vitrified frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective study using a case-control matching analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jun;307(6):1991-1999. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07029-1. Epub 2023 Apr 12. |
| 27827818 | Background | Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, Vanderpoel S, Racowsky C. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):139-155. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038. |
| 6633637 | Background | Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983 Oct 20-26;305(5936):707-9. doi: 10.1038/305707a0. |
| 42152121 | Derived | Wu W, Xu M, Fung KK, Zhang L, Wan HM, Chan CPS, Chung JPW, Chan DYL. Direct warming and rehydration method in frozen embryo transfer: study protocol for a pragmatic, multi-center, double-blinded, two-arm randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2026 May 18. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09663-x. Online ahead of print. |