• Clinical Effectiveness of Frozen Thawed Embryo Transfer Compared to Fresh Embryo Transfer

  NCT02570386

  TerminatedInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Apr 18, 2019
• Comparison of Thawing Embryos in Advance and on the Day of Transfer on Pregnancy Outcomes in FET Cycle

  NCT04455191

  Unknown statusInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Jul 7, 2020
• Study Comparing Outcomes Between Conventional IVF and a "Freeze-all"-Strategy in Assisted Reproductive Technology

  NCT02746562

  Unknown statusInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Apr 2, 2019
• Direct Thawing of Vitrified Human Blastocyst

  NCT06322823

  CompletedInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Mar 21, 2024
• A Randomized Trial Comparing the Live Birth Rate of Immediate Versus Delayed FET Following a Freeze-all Strategy

  NCT04371783

  Active, not recruitingInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Feb 2, 2026
• A RCT on the Effect of Endometrial Injury on Improving Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in Subfertile Women Undergoing FET Cycles

  NCT02197832

  TerminatedInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Dec 11, 2015

ClinicalTrials.gov ID

NCT06741748

Lead Sponsor

Chinese University of Hong KongOTHER

Overall Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

Not Applicable

Enrollment

578Estimated

Last Update Posted

Mar 11, 2025Actual

Start Date

Sep 1, 2025Estimated

Primary Completion Date

Oct 31, 2026Estimated

Completion Date

Oct 31, 2027Estimated

Official Title

A Pragmatic, Multi-centre, Double-blinded, Two-arm Randomized Controlled Trial on a Direct Warming Frozen Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technologies Treatment Outcome

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the direct warming method for frozen embryo transfers (FET) can improve live birth and pregnancy outcomes in women aged 18-45 undergoing IVF treatments. The main questions it aims to answer are:

• Does the direct warming method achieve a similar or higher clinical success rate for FET compared to the conventional multi-step method?
• Is the direct warming method more cost-effective than the conventional method?

Researchers will compare the direct warming method to the conventional multi-step method to see if the former leads to better pregnancy outcomes and reduced procedural time.

Participants will:

• Undergo either the one-step or conventional embryo thawing procedure.
• Complete standard clinical follow-ups for pregnancy, including ultrasound scans and pregnancy tests.

Detailed Description

This clinical trial explores a novel direct warming method for frozen embryo transfer (FET), aimed at improving both clinical and operational outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). The method was designed to simplify and accelerate the embryo thawing process, reducing the time needed for thawing while eliminating the use of cryoprotectants commonly required in conventional thawing methods. This innovation has the potential to offer a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to standard FET procedures.

The primary focus of this trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the direct warming method against the conventional multi-step thawing process. In particular, the study seeks to determine whether the new method yields comparable or superior outcomes in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and live birth rate (LBR), while also assessing its overall cost-effectiveness.

Study Design and Technical Details

This study employs a randomized controlled design, with participants being allocated into either the intervention group (direct warming method) or the control group (conventional multi-step thawing). The direct warming method streamlines the thawing process to just 3 minutes, in contrast to the conventional method, which requires multiple stages and takes approximately 20 minutes. By using only an embryo culture medium without cryoprotectants, the direct warming method reduces both complexity and potential risks associated with handling and cryoprotectant toxicity.

Key Objectives

• Primary Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the direct warming method in achieving comparable or higher success rates for FET as compared to conventional multi-step thawing.
• Secondary Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the direct warming method by comparing the consumable and time costs across different centers.

Expected Impact and Innovation

The direct warming method challenges the traditional multi-step thawing approach, offering a faster and simpler alternative without compromising clinical outcomes. By minimizing the need for cryoprotectants and reducing the complexity of the thawing process, the new method is expected to enhance the overall efficiency of FET procedures while maintaining or improving pregnancy success rates. Additionally, the cost and time savings associated with the direct warming method may make it a viable option for IVF clinics worldwide, driving standardization and consistency across clinical settings.

• Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET)
• Assisted Reproductive Techniques
• In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
• Cryopreservation of Embryos
• Pregnancy Outcome After in Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

• Direct Warming Method
• Conventional Multi-step Thawing Method

Ages Eligible for Study

Adult (18-64)

Sexes Eligible for Study

Female

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• Plan to undergo single embryo transfer (SET) during the FET cycle.
• Age between 18 and 45 years.
• Patients with at least one high-quality blastocyst available for transfer.
• Patients who have provided informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) or recurrent miscarriage (RM).
• Patients with known uterine anomalies or significant uterine pathology (e.g., fibroids, polyps).
• Patients who are unwilling or unable to provide informed consent.

Primary Purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional Model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double

Lead Sponsor

Chinese University of Hong KongOTHER

drdcyl16@cuhk.edu.hk+852 3946 6888

p.bhide@qmul.ac.uk020 8510 5555