Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The adoption of total mesorectal excision (TME) has standardized rectal cancer surgery and improved oncological outcomes. In locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy (NACRT) has further improved oncological benefit. Although these strategies result in good 5-year disease-free survival rates, they are associated with significant morbidity, in particular permanent long-term bowel, urinary and sexual dysfunction. In rectal cancer management, the main objective of organ preservation is to avoid or reduce morbidity and impact on quality of life after rectal resection, without compromising oncological outcomes.
The aim of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of a defined response monitoring program, including a shared decision process, as a strategy for assessing tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.
This is a national, phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial comparing the tumor response monitoring program with shared decision-making, versus standard tumor response assessment in organ preservation strategies in rectal cancer.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Tumor response monitoring program with shared decision-making | Experimental |
| |
| Control: Standard assessment of tumor response (validated in the GRECCAR 2 trial - Lancet 2017) | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor response monitoring program | Other | three steps of tumor response evaluation (STEP 1 at 2 months, STEP 2 at 4 months, STEP 3 at 6 months after completion of neoadjuvant treatment): STEP 1: digital rectal examination, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP scan STEP 2: DRE, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy STEP 3: DRE, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP or PET scan |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Organ preservation rate | An organ-preserving patient is defined as a patient who has not undergone rectal resection. | 2 years after the start of neoadjuvant treatment |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient aged 18 to 80
Histologically proven lieberkuhnian adenocarcinoma with MSS status ;
Patient who has or is due to receive neoadjuvant treatment (4 to 6 courses of (m)FOLFIRINOX or FOLFOX chemotherapy + CAP 50 radiochemotherapy or CAP 50 radiochemotherapy alone);
BEFORE any neoadjuvant treatment:
Tumor classified T2T3 (on MRI)
N0-N1 (≤ 3 positive lymph nodes * or size ≤ 8 mm) (on MRI)
* positive node = node size > 5 mm minor axis and/or morphologically suspicious appearance Tumor size ≤4 cm (ON MRI)
No distant metastasis (M0)_ TAP scan or PET scan
≤ 8 cm from anal margin (On MRI) (Clinical examination*)
*if the clinical examination is not possible, then the source data is that of the MRI.
No invasion of the anal canal and/or sphincters (internal and external) (On MRI)
Operable patient
Ability to comply with the protocol and follow-up appointments (repeated assessment consultations and close follow-up if randomized to the Experimental Group);
Person affiliated with or benefiting from a social security scheme;
Free and informed consent signed by the patient.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quentin DENOST | Contact | 05 47 50 15 75 | q.denost@bordeaux-colorectal-institute.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Dijon Bourgogne | Recruiting | Dijon | 21000 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Standard evaluation of tumor response | Other | Assessment at 2 months (+/- 7 days) after neoadjuvant treatment: digital rectal exam, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP scan |
|
| Shared decision-making | Other | At each stage of the monitoring program and depending on the clinical and oncological results, the decision to preserve the rectum will be discussed with the patient according to a shared-decision program. |
|
| Decision-making according to national recommendations | Other | The decision to preserve the rectum is based on assessment at 2 months after completion of neoadjuvant treatment (standard of care since the GRECCAR2 trial). |
|
| Follow-up | Other | Every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for the third year |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012004 | Rectal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided