Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
First-line systemic treatments for bladder cancer are based on a combination of cytotoxic and immunotherapy, sequentially or concomitantly. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICPI) is a powerful treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Since 2017, pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) can be offered as a second-line treatment after failure of platinum agents. In patients responding to platinum salts in first-line treatment, it is possible to maintain efficacy with maintenance treatment with another ICPI, avelumab (anti-PDL1). The phase III JAVELIN BLADDER 100 study compared avelumab to supportive care alone after successful platinum-based chemotherapy. At 30 months, 19.3% of patients were still in response compared to only 6.3% in the supportive care arm. However, biomarker analysis on tumor tissue did not show a robust signature on an individual scale. Recently, two phase 3 trials in first-line were presented at the ESMO 2023 congress. The first, in patients who could receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, found a benefit on overall survival of adding Nivolumab in combination and then maintaining it for two years. The second proposed combined Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab versus standard chemotherapy, with an overall survival for the study arm of more than 31 months. These trials confirm the essential role of immunotherapy in urothelial carcinomas. This progress is tempered by toxicity, cost and the lack of data on patient selection and treatment sequence. Although "prognostic" biomarkers have been identified, they cannot guide the choice of therapy, but only predict the expected outcomes, regardless of the treatment; biomarkers capable of predicting clinical benefit ("predictive") are urgently needed. It is therefore essential to identify a predictive signature at the individual level. The study authors have validated an in vitro model of heterotypic spheroids (SPHERTEST) composed of commercial urothelial carcinoma tumor cells and PBMCs from healthy donors. The aim of the study is to validate this model with PBMCs from UC patients to evaluate the effects of immunotherapy on the immune response and on tumor cell survival in vitro.
The study hypothesis is that the outcome of the pre-therapeutic test based on a heterotypic spheroid model with PBMC from patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (SPHERTEST) is related to the response to checkpoint inhibitor (CI) treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with urothelial carcinoma |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPHERTEST test | Diagnostic Test | The SPHERETEST is an in vitro model of heterotypic spheroids composed of commercial urothelial carcinoma tumor cells and leukocyte mononuclear cells from healthy donors. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| SPHERTEST measurement of potential therapeutic efficacy | Yes/No. Differential in spheroid size before and after treatment according to the formula: R=M1-M0. R = test results, M0 = average spheroid size without immunotherapy treatment, M1 = average spheroid size with immunotherapy treatment. When R is ≤ 0, SPHERTEST = "yes" or "potential therapeutic efficacy". When R is > 0, SPHERTEST = "no" or "absence of potential therapeutic efficacy" | Day 0 |
| Progression-free survival | Yes/No according to RECIST criteria | Month 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Histology of cells | Pure transitional cells vs predominantly transitional cells | Inclusion |
| Presence of an aggressive minority component | Yes/no |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population consists of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with an indication for treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor treated in the onco-urology departments of the Nîmes University Hospitals, the Antoine Lacassagne Center, the IUCT Toulouse and the Montpellier Regional Cancer Institute.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadine Houede | Contact | 04.66.68.33.01 | nadine.houede@chu-nimes.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nadine Houede | CHU de Nimes | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institut du Cancer de Montpellier | Not yet recruiting | Montpellier | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Venous blood sampling (5 EDTA tubes of 4 ml or 20 ml in total) before and after initiation of immunotherapy.
Stool sampling at the patient's home using a dedicated kit before starting immunotherapy and then before cycle 4 ( of treatment.
| Inclusion |
| Type of other component | Micropapillary, microcystic, trophoblastic differentiation, epidermoid differentiation, nested, plasmacytoid, sarcomatoid, rhabdoid, lymphoepitheliomatoid, large cell, undifferentiated or neuroendocrine | Inclusion |
| Tumor grade | WHO grading | Inclusion |
| PD1/PDL1 status | Yes/no | Inclusion |
| PDL1 score | positive/negative | Inclusion |
| Type of metastatic involvement | Locally advanced (= local recurrence, or pelvic lymph node involvement) or Metastatic sites: liver, bone, lung, brain, extrapelvic lymph node, other | Inclusion |
| Primary tumor site | Bladder/Urethra/upper urinary tract/Urethra | Inclusion |
| Hemoglobin level | g/dL | Inclusion |
| Hemoglobin level | g/dL | Cycle 2 visit |
| Lactate dehydrogenase level | UI/L | Inclusion |
| Lactate dehydrogenase level | UI/L | Cycle 2 visit |
| C-reactive protein level | mg/L | Inclusion |
| C-reactive protein level | mg/L | Cycle 2 visit |
| Neutrophil count | G/L | Inclusion |
| Neutrophil count | G/L | Cycle 2 visit (cycles are spaced 3 weeks (pembrolizumab) or 2 weeks (avelumab) apart) |
| Lymphocyte count | G/L | Inclusion |
| Lymphocyte count | G/L | Cycle 2 visit (cycles are spaced 3 weeks (pembrolizumab) or 2 weeks (avelumab) apart) |
| Number of lines of systemic treatment received in the metastatic phase | 0, 1, 2, ≥3 | Inclusion |
| Type of platinum salt received prior to immunotherapy | Cisplatin or carboplatin | Inclusion |
| Treatment regimen prior to anti-PD1 therapy | Neoadjuvant with progression within 12 months / Adjuvant with progression within 12 months / Initially locally advanced/metastatic | Inclusion |
| Current treatment: whether treatment is combined with another molecule | Cisplatin / entoftumab-vedotin | Inclusion |
| Antibiotics in the previous month | Duration (days) | Inclusion |
| Corticosteroid therapy > 10 mg prednisolone equivalent at immunotherapy initiation | Yes/no | Inclusion |
| Taking an immunosuppressant other than corticosteroid therapy at immunotherapy initiation | Yes/no | Inclusion |
| Any comedication at immunotherapy initiation | Protein pump inhibitors / beta blockers / metformin / statin | Inclusion |
| Patient functioning level | ECOG Performance Status Scale (1-5) | Inclusion |
| BCG vaccine | Yes/no | Inclusion |
| Mitomycin therapy | Yes/no | Inclusion |
| History of auto-immune disease | Yes/no | Inclusion |
| Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier | Not yet recruiting | Montpellier | France |
|
| Centre Antoine Lacassagne | Not yet recruiting | Nice | France |
|
| CHU de Nimes | Recruiting | Nîmes | France |
|
| Iuct Oncopole | Recruiting | Toulouse | France |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided