Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R21AR081007-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Northwestern University | OTHER |
| Rush University | OTHER |
| National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a brief health coaching intervention based on an approach known as brief action planning + Fitbit can increase physical activity in employees with chronic knee symptoms who work for Advocate Aurora Health. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare a health education coaching intervention + Fitbit to see if providing a Fitbit + attention control will increase physical activity to at least 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week among members of the attention-control group.
Participants will engage in
Chronic knee symptoms (CKS) are associated with pain, loss of independence, and increased mortality. Rates of CKS are increasing, fueled by an aging, obese, and sedentary society. Because CKS first presents in working age adults, it is a major cause of work disability and work productivity loss.
Being physically active improves the health of adults who have ongoing (chronic) complaints of knee pain, knee stiffness, or challenges with moving around. Physical activity helps decrease pain, improve stiffness, and improve physical function as it relates to the knee. It also helps people improve their general health. Unfortunately, it is hard for many people to become more physically active. Physical activity can be inconvenient and uncomfortable for many people, and people who join physical activity programs often drop out of them after a short time (3-6 months). However, people are more likely to reach their physical activity goals if they work with a health coach who supports the process.
Health coaching often includes a combination of self-monitoring such as using smart devices to monitor outcomes plus the support of goal-directed behavior. Previous research has found that Fitbit tracking can improve behavior for some people who have CKS but not for others. Whereas we know people can receive benefit from coaching, the exact amount of coaching needed remains unknown. Discussion with employee stakeholders have informed our intervention desire as they have asked for a low resource form of coaching available through the workplace. The potential exists to support employees with CKS using an acceptable, low-resource coaching strategy.
The goal of this program is to test a brief, scalable PA coaching intervention that can assist employees with CKS attain and maintain healthy PA behavior in worksites in the Midwest. CAPPA is a 12-week pilot randomized controlled trial that will 1) use computer-guided action-planning behavioral intervention to support employees in making physical activity action plans for their health, 2) use data transmitted from a personal fitness tracker (Fitbit) to support coach and employee knowledge about PA performance, and 3) Inform on optimal step up times for participants who do not substantially increase PA. The CAPPA system will put PA feedback in a Movement Dashboard to support study participants. The CAPPA intervention will primarily use video chat to attain and sustain healthy PA behavior across worksites at Advocate Aurora Health.
Follow-up measures of PA, pain and physical function are planned at treatment completion and three months following study completion. Specific aims are to: 1) Estimate the efficacy of the intervention to increase objectively measured physical activity, 2) Examine the feasibility, acceptability and sustainability of the CAPPA intervention for the respective workplaces, and 3) Inform the initial step up time for future stepped interventions among participants not substantially increasing their physical activity. This study leverages the combined clinical and technologic expertise of the members of the Physical Activity in Rheumatology Research group at Northwestern University, Northwestern's Arthritis Center Accelerometer unit, Marquette University's Behavior, Engagement and Technology Assessment Lab and Ubiquitous Computing Lab, and Advocate Aurora Health.
This research could have a tremendous impact on improving symptoms and quality of life for those with CKS and early KOA. If treatments are successful at Advocate Aurora Health they may be employed in the services they provide to other organizations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Computer-guided Action Planning to support Physical Activity (CAPPA) | Experimental | Participants in the CAPPA Arm receive a Fitbit and health coaching using Computer-guided Action planning. Coaches will utilize the coaching software within www.myactionplans.com to guide the coaching interaction and support physical activity plan development. The emphasis is this arm is to create plans that are person-centered and driven by the participant. The action planning process is grounded in the conversational style of motivational interviewing and follows Brief Action Planning as a self-management support style. Coaches in the CAPPA arm will also have access to a custom Movement Dashboard which that uses Fitbit data to plot daily physical activity. The dashboard is coach-facing and is used to support coach dialogue about physical activity. There is scheduling flexibility: 4-12 visits over the 12-week period. Participants are strongly encouraged not to have a gap longer than three weeks between visits. |
|
| Health education | Active Comparator | Participants in Arm 2 receive a Fitbit and health education delivered by a coach. Health education selects topics from the chronic disease self-management program that address common features of living with a chronic condition. Arm 2 avoids making specific plans and avoids discussion of physical activity. The emphasis in this arm is in providing education. There is scheduling flexibility, 4-12 visits over the 12-week period. Participants are strongly encouraged not to have a gap longer than three weeks between visits to keep the content fresh. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPPA | Behavioral | See CAPPA arm description. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of CDC-guideline based physical activity compliance | Proportion of people per treatment arm meeting CDC guidelines for aerobic physical activity. How many participants per group have achieved 150 minutes of weekly moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. | baseline, 3 month, 6month follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fitbit measured physical activity | Minutes of non-sedentary activity/day; Minutes of light, moderate-vigorous physical activity/day | baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4. |
| Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria: Participants must be
Exclusion Criteria: Participants will be excluded if they
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Pinto, PhD | Marquette University | Principal Investigator |
| Rowland W Chang, MD MPH | Northwestern University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marquette University | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53233 | United States |
Not provided
IPD will be available 1 year after NIH final report submission.
IPD can be accessed by those who submit a proposal to the CAPPA leadership team describing planned analyses using a cloud-based online submission form. No formal data sharing agreement need be signed.
To facilitate interpretation of the data, data dictionaries and protocols will be shared and associated with the relevant datasets via readme.txt files for the associated data.
Data files will be archived using a SAS-based project-specific database with detailed documentation of any editing and data review adjudications while keeping original data files intact. Archived data files used to derive data analysis and original data files of non-identifiable, outcomes-related IPD will be shared.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Health education | Behavioral | See health education arm description |
|
A self-report measure with 17 items used to measure fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic pain patients
| Baseline, 3 months, 6 months |
| Michigan Body Map | The Michigan Body Map (MBM) is a self-report measure to assess body areas of chronic pain. The MBM can also quantify the degree of widespread body pain when assessing for centralized pain features. | baseline, 3 month, 6 month follow-up |
| Self-efficacy for physical activity | This scale is a self-report of exercise self-efficacy. | baseline, 3 month, 6 month follow-up |
| Numeric Pain Rating Scale | The NPRS is an 11-point scale scored from 0-10:
| baseline, 3 month, 6 month follow-up |
| WOMAC pain and physical function sub-scales | The WOMAC subscales of pain (five questions), and physical function (17 questions). The subscale scores can vary, with pain ranging from 0 to 20 points; and physical function, 0 to 68 points. Higher scores represent worse pain and functional limitations. | baseline, 3 month, and 6 month follow up |
| PROMIS self reported outcomes | Computer-adaptive tests of self-reported physical function, pain interference, fatigue, and positive affect. | Baseline, 3 month, 6 month follow-up |
| Performance-based outcomes - Timed up and Go | Timed up and go - time it takes to stand from chair, walk 3 meters, return to chair and sit. measured in seconds | baseline, 3 month, 6 month follow-up |
| Performance-based outcomes - 4 meter walk | Time it takes to walk four (4) meters. Measured in seconds | baseline, 3 month, 6 month follow-up |
| Performance-based outcomes - 5x sit-stand | Time it takes to complete five (5) repetitions of the sit to stand movement. Timed from leaving the surface of the seat on the first sit-stand movement to contacting the seated surface on the fifth sit-stand movement. | baseline, 3 month, 6 month follow-up |
| Feasibility measure - recruitment rate | Number of participants engaging in screening process following targeted email or onset of recruitment campaigns. | 3 month follow-up |
| Feasibility measures - consent rate | The proportion of eligible individuals who agreed to participate. | 3 month follow-up |
| Feasibility measures - drop out rate | Proportion of individuals who dropped out of the study at different stages of the study. | 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up |
| Feasibility measures - adherence to protocol | adherence to protocols - proportion of people who completed at least 4 coaching visits. | 3 month follow-up |
| Feasibility measures - personnel retention | number of personnel that left the study | 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up |
| Feasibility measures - fidelity | Proportion of reviewed coach recordings that followed prescribed coaching method. | 3 month follow-up |
| Feasibility measures-qualitative | Qualitative sentiment regarding the ability of the coaching approach to integrate in an individual's work life. | 3 month follow-up |
| D012216 |
| Rheumatic Diseases |
| D001519 | Behavior |