Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to explore the efficacy and safety of two different dTMS devices in adolescent depression: deep TMS H1 coil and deep TMS H7 coil.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Type of study: Clinical trial. Participant population: Adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). Objective: To explore whether the H7 coil is no less effective than the H1 coil for adolescents with MDD, further providing clinicians with additional treatment options for patients.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe and well-tolerated intervention that has been extensively studied as a treatment for MDD. However, little is known about the effectiveness of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) in adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). Only one open-label trial tested dTMS using H1 coils in adolescents with treatment-resistant depression, the results showed that the severity of depressive symptoms was significantly reduced after treatment, with a response rate of 42%. Hence, the continued efforts are needed to improve and optimize these treatments.
One important factor that influence the efficacy of TMS was the seletion of stimulation target. In recent years, medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) have recently been considered promising alternative targets for treatment of adolescents with MDD, due to their association with reward, emotion, mood, and habits. Additionally, the stimulation target for dTMS with the H7 coil is the MPFC. Current relevant clinical studies show that after dTMS intervention using the H7 coil, depressive symptoms and overall clinical impressions in adults with MDD are significantly improved. However, whether alternative strategies for TMS treatment (e.g., H1 coil versus H7 coil) are more effective in adolescents with MDD remains unknown.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different dTMS devices (H1 coil and H7 coil) in the treatment of adolescent with MDD, further providing clinicians with additional treatment options for patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 coil | Active Comparator | First, the 'hot spot' for activation of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle was established and motor threshold (MT) determined. Then, the H1 coil was advanced 6 cm anterior to the scalp surface.The rMT was rechecked at least once a week. Treatment intensity was 80% of rMT.During 4 consecutive weeks (5 sessions/wk) patients were treated daily . Patients in the treatment group will receive the Deep TMS protocol (80% of rMT, 18 Hz, 2 seconds on and 20 seconds off over a 20-minute period; total of 1,980 stimuli per session), applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. |
|
| H7 coil | Experimental | First, the 'hot spot' for activation of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle was established and motor threshold (MT) determined. Then, the H7 coil was advanced 4 cm anterior to 'hot spot' and aligned symmetrically over the dmPFC. The rMT was rechecked at least once a week.The rMT was rechecked at least once a week. Treatment intensity was 80% of rMT.During 4 consecutive weeks (5 sessions/wk) patients were treated daily . Patients in the treatment group will receive the Deep TMS protocol (80% of rMT, 18 Hz, 2 seconds on and 20 seconds off over a 20-minute period; total of 1,980 stimuli per session), applied over themedial prefrontal cortex. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deep transcranial magnetic stimulation with H1coil | Device | Participants will receive dTMS treatment with H1 coil |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Depression Scale -24 (HAMD-24) | score change. Higher score means worse outcome.(Min = 0, Max = 76) | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Response on Hamilton Depression Scale-24 | Defined as a score reduction of 50% or more | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Remission onHamilton Depression Scale-24 | Defined as a score of 7 or less | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) | score change. Higher score means worse outcome.(Min = 0, Max = 56) | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhifen Liu | Contact | +8613703586547 | zhifenliu@sxmu.edu.cn |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Recruiting | Taiyuan | Shanxi | 030001 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
randomized, double-blind,single-center, two-arm, parallel-group superiority trial
Not provided
Not provided
Given the study's design, blinding TMS operators will not be possible. Still, participants、staff responsible for participant assessments and data analysis will be blinded to treatment conditions and external to the clinic staff. Patients will be instructed not to reveal their group assignment to the raters. Patients will not be given the specifics of the treatment parameters and will be instructed not to talk to each other during the study period. Both treatments will be presented as effective to them. Lastly, the data management center will strictly control access to the randomization code.
| deep transcranial magnetic stimulation with H7 coil | Device | Participants will receive dTMS treatment with H7 coil |
|
score change. Higher score means worse outcome.(Min= 0, Max = 56)
| From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation-Chinese Version (BSI-CV) | score change. Higher score means worse outcome.(Min= 0, Max = 38) | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Self-Injury Diary Card | Higher numeric value means worse outcome. | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI) | Higher score means worse outcome.(Min= 0, Max = 21) | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Clinical Global Impression (CGI) | Higher score means worse outcome.(Min= 0, Max = 7) | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Repeatable Battery for the Assessmental of Neuropsychological Status(RBANS) | Lower score means worse outcome.(Min=40, Max = 160) | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Brief Symptom Inventory-18(BSI-18) | Higher score means worse outcome.(Min= 0, Max = 90) | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Beck Depression Inventory-II | score change. Higher score means worse outcome.(Min= 0, Max = 63) | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Recruiting | Taiyuan | Shanxi | 030012 | China |
|