Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, severe and chronic systemic autoimmune disease (AD) characterized by vasculopathy, immune dysregulation and fibrosis leading to multi-organ dysfunction (primarily skin, lungs, heart gastrointestinal tract and kidneys), with high morbidity and mortality, altered health-related quality of life, all at high cost for patients and society.
Treatment are mostly symptomatic and only autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has shown long term improvement in overall and event-free survival with disease-modifying properties. However, AHSCT is contra-indicated in case of advanced visceral involvement and in eligible patients, it is still associated with risk of toxicity. There is an urgent need to identify safe and effective treatments for severe SSc.
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are multipotent cells which carry immunomodulatory, pro-angiogenic and anti-fibrotic properties, that can target SSc pathogenesis and its clinical manifestations. The increasing use of MSC, harvested from bone marrow (MSC(M)), adipose tissue (MSC(AT)), or umbilical cord (MSC(UC)) in a variety of indications, provides consistent evidence supporting their safety in humans. The efficacy of MSC(M) intravenous (IV) injection for treating acute graft versus host disease led to their marketing approval in 2012 and MSC(AT) (Alofisel) were approved for severe Crohn's fistula in 2018.
MSC represent a promising therapeutic approach for SSc. We have previously a) shown disease-specific abnormalities in MSC(M) from SSc patients, providing strong rationale to use allogeneic MSC to treat SSc patients, b) published the first phase I/II dose escalation trial using allogenic MSC(M) infusion in 20 severe SSc patients (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02213705, PHRC AOM 11-250) with no safety issues, significant improvement in skin fibrosis at 3 to 6 months after infusion which appeared lower thereafter, thereby supporting the need for repeated infusions.
In vitro, experimental and clinical studies suggest that MSC properties vary according to their tissue of origin/source. We demonstrated that compared to MSC(M), MSC(AT) are easier to harvest and display higher proliferative capability before entering senescence, higher genetic stability, and superior immunosuppressive properties.
Considering the above rationale, we hypothesize that use of healthy donors allogeneic MSC(AT) produced by Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) will demonstrate a) no safety issues, b) an efficacy profile that will increase with repeated infusion of allogeneic MSC(AT) to treat SSc.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 infusions of MSC | Experimental |
| |
| 1 infusion of MSC | Experimental |
| |
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 infusions of MSC | Biological | 1 MSC(AT) (2x10^6 cells/kg) injection at M0 and 1 MSC(AT) (2x10^6 cells/kg) injection at M3 |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events | Defined as Adverse Events (AE) of grade equal or above 3 using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 classification, at one month after each infusion according to arms (M1, M4) An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3 | After each infusion |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE) | Adverse Events of grade equal or above 3 CTCAE v5.0 An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3 | At time of infusion |
| Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Exploring immune landscape in SSc skin biopsies and signatures predicting treatment response | Before and after MSC(AT) | Up to 12 months |
| Evaluating new MSC potency assays interrogating MSC efferocytosis |
Inclusion Criteria:
Provide signed and dated informed consent;
Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study;
Male or female, aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years of age
SSc patients according to American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) 2013 classification criteria for SSc
Severe disease with either:
disease duration of 2 years or less with a modified Rodnan skin score (mRss) ≥ 20 and (abnormal CRP > 5 mg/l and/or hemoglobin < 11 g/dL), or
mRSS ≥ 15 without any restriction as to disease duration plus at least one major organ involvement as defined by:
Contraindication, inadequate response or unwillingness to undergo AHSCT(determined by patient and physician judgement)
Contraindication, inadequate response or unwillingness or adverse events necessitating discontinuation of conventional immunosuppressive therapy (MMF, methotrexate);
Women of reproductive potential must use highly effective contraception;
Men of reproductive potential must use condoms;
Health insurance.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominique Farge, MD PhD | Contact | 0142499764 | +33 | dominique.farge-bancel@aphp.fr |
| Jérôme Lambert, MD PhD | Contact | 0142499742 | +33 | jerome.lambert@u-paris.fr |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multi-center, three-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Double-blind
| 1 infusion of MSC | Biological | 1 MSC(AT) (2x10^6 cells/kg) injection at M0 and 1 placebo injection at M3 |
|
| Placebo | Other | Placebo at M0 and M3 |
|
Adverse Events of grade equal or above 3 CTCAE v5.0 An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3 |
| Within 24 hours of infusion |
| Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE) | Adverse Events of grade equal or above 3 CTCAE v5.0 An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3 | At 6 months |
| Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE) | Adverse Events of grade equal or above 3 CTCAE v5.0 An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3 | At 9 months |
| Rate of treatment-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE) | Adverse Events of grade equal or above 3 CTCAE v5.0 An injection will be considered as not tolerated for any toxicity criteria above grade ≥ 3 | At 12 months |
| Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) difference | Main efficacy endpoint is assessed by mRSS difference between M0 and M12 Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) is a semiquantitative score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe), used to evaluate the skin thickness in 17 different cutaneous sites (for a total score from 0 to 51). The higher the score, the more severe the disease. | Between Month 0 and month 12 |
| Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) | Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) is a semiquantitative score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe), used to evaluate the skin thickness in 17 different cutaneous sites (for a total score from 0 to 51). The higher the score, the more severe the disease. | At 3 months |
| Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) | Mean modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) is a semiquantitative score, ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe), used to evaluate the skin thickness in 17 different cutaneous sites (for a total score from 0 to 51). The higher the score, the more severe the disease. | At 6 months |
| WHO performance status | Karnofsky performance scale Score varies betwwen 0 and 5. The lower the score, the less the patient's life is affected. | At month 0 |
| WHO performance status | Karnofsky performance scale Score varies betwwen 0 and 5. The lower the score, the less the patient's life is affected. | At month 3 |
| WHO performance status | Karnofsky performance scale Score varies betwwen 0 and 5. The lower the score, the less the patient's life is affected. | At month 6 |
| WHO performance status | Karnofsky performance scale Score varies betwwen 0 and 5. The lower the score, the less the patient's life is affected. | At month 12 |
| Scleroderma-Health Assessment Quetionnaire | It determines a disability index (DI), which is calculated as a continuous variable from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability) Steen VA Arthritis et rhumatism 1997 ; 40 : 1984-91 | At month 0 |
| Scleroderma-Health Assessment Quetionnaire | It determines a disability index (DI), which is calculated as a continuous variable from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability) Steen VA Arthritis et rhumatism 1997 ; 40 : 1984-91 | At month 3 |
| Scleroderma-Health Assessment Quetionnaire | It determines a disability index (DI), which is calculated as a continuous variable from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability) Steen VA Arthritis et rhumatism 1997 ; 40 : 1984-91 | At month 6 |
| Scleroderma-Health Assessment Quetionnaire | It determines a disability index (DI), which is calculated as a continuous variable from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability) Steen VA Arthritis et rhumatism 1997 ; 40 : 1984-91 | At month 12 |
| Short Form (36) health survey (SF36v2) | The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability. | At month 0 |
| Short Form (36) health survey (SF36v2) | The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability. | At month 3 |
| Short Form (36) health survey (SF36v2) | The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability. | At month 6 |
| Short Form (36) health survey (SF36v2) | The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability. | At month 12 |
| EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire | It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life. | At month 0 |
| EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire | It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life. | At month 3 |
| EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire | It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life. | At month 6 |
| EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire | It evaluates five dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and each dimension has five levels : no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Answers are given on a 5-point scale by domain, the higher the score, the poorer the quality of life. | At month 12 |
| Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | At month 0 |
| Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | At month 3 |
| Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | At month 6 |
| Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | At month 12 |
| Diffusing capacity of Lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) | At month 0 |
| Diffusing capacity of Lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) | At month 3 |
| Diffusing capacity of Lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) | At month 6 |
| Diffusing capacity of Lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) | At month 12 |
| Response to treatment | Defined as any of the following: decreased mRss > 25%, increased FVC > 10% and/or increased DLCO >10%, without need for further immunosuppression except low dose steroids (below 10mg daily) | At month 3 |
| Response to treatment | Defined as any of the following: decreased mRss > 25%, increased FVC > 10% and/or increased DLCO >10%, without need for further immunosuppression except low dose steroids (below 10mg daily) | At month 6 |
| Response to treatment | Defined as any of the following: decreased mRss > 25%, increased FVC > 10% and/or increased DLCO >10%, without need for further immunosuppression except low dose steroids (below 10mg daily) | At month 12 |
| Progression Free Survival | Defined as the percentage of enrolled patients still alive without evidence of progression 12 months after MSC(AT) injection, with progression defined as any of the following compared to baseline evaluation: decreased FVC > 10% or DLCO > 15%; decrease in LVEF% > 15%; decrease in weight > 15%; decrease in creatinine clearance > 30%; increased mRss > 25% ; and/or increase in SHAQ> 0.5 | At month 12 |
| Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) | GRCS is based on several outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure , renal failure , or cardiac failure . The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline. | At month 3 |
| Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) | GRCS is based on several outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure , renal failure , or cardiac failure . The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline. | At month 6 |
| Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) | GRCS is based on several outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure , renal failure , or cardiac failure . The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline. | At month 12 |
| Composite response index in dcSSc (CRISS) | For early SSc patients only It is a weighted score and includes five measures: modified Rodnan skin score, FVC% predicted, HAQ-DI, patient and clinician global assessments. CRISS score is a probability from 0 to 1 that represents the likelihood of a patient achieving overall improvement. The higher the score, the greater the improvement | At month 3 |
| Composite response index in dcSSc (CRISS) | For early SSc patients only It is a weighted score and includes five measures: modified Rodnan skin score, FVC% predicted, HAQ-DI, patient and clinician global assessments. CRISS score is a probability from 0 to 1 that represents the likelihood of a patient achieving overall improvement. The higher the score, the greater the improvement. | At month 6 |
| Composite response index in dcSSc (CRISS) | For early SSc patients only | At month 12 |
| Overall survival | For early SSc patients only It is a weighted score and includes five measures: modified Rodnan skin score, FVC% predicted, HAQ-DI, patient and clinician global assessments. CRISS score is a probability from 0 to 1 that represents the likelihood of a patient achieving overall improvement. The higher the score, the greater the improvement | At month 12 |
| Impact of allogeneic MSC(AT) infusion on the immune response | Impact of allogeneic MSC(AT) iv once or twice at 3 months interval on the immune response, including immunophenotyping and alloimmunization up to M6 after starting therapy | Up to 6 months |
| Cost effectiveness of the allogeneic MSC(AT) infusion | Once or twice versus no treatment in severe SSc | At month 12 |
| Up to 12 months |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012595 | Scleroderma, Systemic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided