Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of preoperative PECS I block and intraoperative local anesthetic infiltration in managing postoperative pain following breast augmentation surgery. The primary focus was to evaluate their impact on postoperative pain levels, perioperative remifentanil and postoperative opioid consumption and opioid-related side effects during the early recovery period.
Breast augmentation is one of the most performed procedures in aesthetic surgery worldwide.These techniques, which involve muscle dissection and manipulation, tend to be more painful compared to subglandular and subfascial placements. Thus, managing postoperative pain effectively becomes a critical aspect of patient recovery and satisfaction.
To address postoperative pain in breast augmentation, various techniques, including regional anesthesia such as pectoral nerve blocks, local anesthetic infiltration, and pocket irrigation, are employed.
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of preoperative PECS I block and intraoperative local anesthetic infiltration in managing postoperative pain following breast augmentation surgery. The primary focus was to evaluate their impact on postoperative pain levels, perioperative remifentanil and postoperative opioid consumption and opioid-related side effects during the early recovery period.
This prospective, double-blind, split-body design study was conducted at Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine, Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Department, in collaboration with the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department.
The anesthesia induction and PECS I blocks for the right breasts were performed by the same anesthesiologist in all patients (O.K.). Breast augmentation surgeries and local anesthetic infiltrations for the left breasts were performed by the same plastic surgeon (M.E.). Postoperative pain assessments were conducted by a different anesthesiologist who was blinded to the study design.
Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from "0 = no pain" to "10 = unbearable pain." Pain assessments were performed every 30 minutes for the first 2 hours, every 2 hours between 2 and 6 hours, and at the 24ᵗʰ hour postoperatively.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PECS I Block Intervention Arm | Experimental | This arm involves the application of a preoperative PECS I block with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. The intervention targets the right breast, aiming to evaluate its effectiveness in managing postoperative pain compared to local anesthetic infiltration. |
|
| Local Anesthetic Infiltration Intervention Arm | Experimental | This arm involves the administration of intraoperative local anesthetic infiltration using 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under direct visualization. The intervention targets the left breast, aiming to compare its effectiveness in managing postoperative pain against the PECS I block. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PECS I Block | Procedure | The PECS I block is a regional anesthesia technique performed preoperatively under ultrasound guidance. It involves the injection of 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscles to block the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. This procedure targets the right breast in the study to reduce postoperative pain and is compared to local anesthetic infiltration. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Pain Intensity | The level of postoperative pain in each breast region (right vs. left) measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Pain scores will be recorded at specific intervals: every 30 minutes for the first 2 hours, every 2 hours from 2 to 6 hours, at the 24th hour, on the 5th postoperative day, and at the 3rd month. The primary focus is the pain intensity within the first 6 hours postoperatively. | Up to 6 hours post-surgery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Opioid Consumption | Total tramadol consumption recorded within the first 6 hours and the first 24 hours postoperatively. This includes the amount administered via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and any additional doses required. | Up to 24 hours post-surgery. |
| Opioid-Related Side Effects |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Participation in this study is limited to self-identified women who are biologically female (cisgender women). Individuals whose self-identified gender does not align with their biological sex (e.g., transgender men, transgender women, or nonbinary individuals) are not eligible for this study. This criterion ensures consistency in evaluating outcomes related to breast augmentation surgery in a biologically female population.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mert Ersan, Asst.Prof. | Yeditepe University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yeditepe University Kozyatagi Hospital | Istanbul | Atasehir | 34752 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
The following specific individual participant data (IPD) will be shared:
De-identified Participant Data:
Demographic data (age, BMI, ASA classification). Pain scores measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at predefined intervals.
Postoperative opioid consumption (tramadol and morphine requirements). Incidence of postoperative complications (e.g., sensory changes, wound dehiscence).
Data Dictionary:
A comprehensive guide explaining the variables and coding used in the dataset to ensure accurate interpretation by other researchers.
Exclusions:
Personally identifiable information (e.g., names, contact information) will not be shared to maintain participant confidentiality.
The data will be shared after the study is completed, analyzed, and the results are published in a peer-reviewed journal. Access will be granted only to researchers who provide a justified request and agree to the terms of a formal data-sharing agreement
The data and supporting information will be made available after the study is completed, analyzed, and the results are published in a peer-reviewed journal.
IPD and supporting documents will be shared through a secure online repository or data-sharing platform, accessible only to approved researchers
Researchers must submit a formal data-sharing request, including a detailed explanation of how the data will be used.
A data-sharing agreement must be signed to ensure the ethical use of the shared information, adherence to confidentiality, and compliance with relevant regulations.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000377 | Agnosia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
This study utilized a Crossover design with a split-body approach, where each participant served as their own control. The intervention involved two pain management techniques:
PECS I block: Administered to the right breast by an anesthesiologist before surgery.
Local anesthetic infiltration: Performed on the left breast by the plastic surgeon during surgery.
This design allowed for direct comparison of the efficacy of the two interventions (PECS I block vs. local anesthetic infiltration) in managing postoperative pain within the same participant.
The crossover and split-body methodology minimized inter-individual variability and provided robust data on the relative effectiveness of each technique, as all other surgical and anesthetic factors were standardized across both sides.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Local Anesthetic Infiltration | Procedure | Local anesthetic infiltration involves the intraoperative administration of 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under direct visualization into the pectoralis major muscle prior to muscle transection. This procedure targets the left breast in the study for pain management and is compared to the PECS I block. |
|
Incidence of opioid-related side effects such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and respiratory depression. These will be monitored and recorded for each participant during the postoperative hospital stay |
| Up to 24 hours post-surgery |
| Chronic Pain Assessment | Presence of chronic pain in the breast region assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at the 3rd-month follow-up | At 3 months post-surgery |
| Postoperative Complications | Incidence of complications such as wound dehiscence, hematoma, infection, implant rupture, or sensory changes in the nipple. All complications will be recorded during routine follow-ups. | Up to 3 months post-surgery |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |