Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common disease, and the tricuspid valve (TV) is no longer a "forgotten valve". Open heart surgery for isolated TR is uncommonly performed due to high operative risk (8-10% mortality). However, TR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There exists an unmet clinical need for less invasive intervention to treat TR. Transcatheter edge to edge repair (TEER) is a technique that is shown to be safe and effective in TR reduction and is associated with significant symptom improvement. However, a significant portion of TV anatomy are not suitable to be treated with TEER (e.g. coaptation gap >10mm). A wide variety of technologies has been developed in recent years. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) is one of the more promising option for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) patients at high risk for surgery. A previous study reported that transcatheter tricuspid devices, which were employed with the radial force between the device and tricuspid annulus, were radial force-dependent. However, this radial force for valve fixation may cause complications, such as conduction block and right coronary artery impingement. The LuX-Valve (Jenscare Biotechnology) is a radial force-independent orthotopic TTVR device. The feasibility and efficacy of this device have been reported by several studies. However, this valve was implanted through right atrial access, where a small incision of the right chest and right atrium is needed. The LuX-Valve Plus valve replacement system is the second-generation version of the LuX-Valve and can be implanted through the jugular vein. The first-in-human implantation was recently performed. The study aims to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy outcome of the Lux Valve Plus system in a cohort of otherwise no surgical option patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation despite optimal medical therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LuxValve PLlus | Device | The LuX-Valve (Jenscare Biotechnology) is a radial force-independent orthotopic TTVR device. The feasibility and efficacy of this device have been reported by several studies (11-13). However, this valve was implanted through right atrial access, where a small incision of the right chest and right atrium is needed. The LuX-Valve Plus valve replacement system is the second-generation version of the LuX-Valve and can be implanted through the jugular vein. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| A composite endpoint of Major Adverse Event (MAE) | A composite endpoint of Major Adverse Event (MAE) at 30 days post procedure: Cardiovascular Mortality, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Stroke, New onset renal failure requiring unplanned dialysis or renal replacement therapy, Severe Bleeding (includes fatal, life-threatening and extensive bleeding as defined by VARC), Non-selective tricuspid valve surgery or transcatheter re-intervention post procedure, Major cardiac structural complications, Major access site and vascular complications, New pacemaker implantation due to AV block | 1 year post-op |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acute Device Success Rate | successful deployment of the device and removal of the delivery system as planned, with no unplanned surgery related to the device or access procedure. | At the end of Procedure |
| Procedural Success Rate |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kent So, PI | Chinese University of Hong Kong | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prince of Wales Hospital | Hong Kong | Shatin | 0000 | Hong Kong |
IPD will not be shared
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014262 | Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Device success without clinically significant PVL, as determined by the Echo Core Lab (ECL) assessment of a discharge TTE. Subjects who die or undergo tricuspid valve surgery before discharge are procedure failures.
| At the end of Procedure |
| All-cause mortality | 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality | 30-day and 1-year post-op |
| Heart failure hospitalization | 30-day and 1-year Heart failure hospitalization | 30-day and 1-year post-op |
| NYHA Functional Class | NYHA Functional Class 2. Distance of 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) 3. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ):Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status | 30-day and 1-year post-op |
| Distance of 6-Minute Walk Test | Distance of 6-Minute Walk Test in meters | 30-day and 1-year post-op |
| Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire | Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ):Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status | 30-day and 1-year post-op |
| TR Severity | TR Severity assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |
| Mean Tricuspid valve inflow gradient | Mean Tricuspid valve inflow gradient assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |
| Right Atrial Volume | Right Atrial Volume assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |
| TAPSE | TAPSE assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |
| Right ventricular functions assessments | Right ventricular functions assessments assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |
| Right ventricular functions assessments: fractional area change(FAC) | Right ventricular functions assessments: fractional area change(FAC)assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |
| Right ventricular functions assessments: systolic tricuspid lateral annular tissue velocity S' | Right ventricular functions assessments: systolic tricuspid lateral annular tissue velocity S' assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |
| Right ventricular functions assessments: Hepatic vein flow reversal | Right ventricular functions assessments: Hepatic vein flow reversal assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |
| Systolic pulmonary artery pressure | Systolic pulmonary artery pressure assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |
| Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) | Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |
| Paravalvular leak severity | Paravalvular leak severity assessed by echocardiography | Baseline, day 1, day 30, 6-month, 1-year |