Comparative Effectiveness of Racemic Ketamine Versus Esketamine (Spravato®) for Depression
Comparative Effectiveness of Racemic Ketamine Versus Esketamine (Spravato®) for Depression
The purpose of this study is to compare the relative effectiveness, acceptability, and side effects of ketamine delivered through an IV (a drip into the arm) which is not currently FDA approved for use in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and Esketamine (Spravato®), taken as a nasal spray which has received FDA approval for use in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in the treatment of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The study will look at the following:
The study will also examine factors that may predict which treatment works better for certain patients.
This non-inferiority, multi-site, comparative effectiveness study will utilize a randomized design. Individuals with treatment resistant depression (TRD) will be randomized (1:1) to Spravato® or IV ketamine. This 5-year multisite comparative effectiveness study will enroll 400 total patients (~200 per group).
Inclusion Criteria:
Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
Adults ages 18 or older
Diagnosis of major depressive disorder that is refractory to two or more antidepressant trials
Moderate or severe depression based on an initial MADRS score ≥ 25
Judged appropriate for ketamine or esketamine by clinician, independent of potential study participation
A female participant must be:
a. Not of childbearing potential*, OR b. Of childbearing potential and practicing a highly effective method of contraception (failure rate of <1% per year when used consistently and correctly) and agrees to remain on a highly effective method while receiving study intervention and until 1 week after last dose - the end of relevant systemic exposure. The investigator will evaluate the potential for contraceptive method failure (e.g., noncompliance, recently initiated) in relationship to the first dose of drug. Acceptable methods of contraception are: i. combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal or progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, transdermal, or intravaginal) ii. intrauterine device (IUD) iii. intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS) iv. bilateral tubal occlusion/ligation v. male partner with a bilateral vasectomy with documented aspermia or a bilateral orchiectomy vi. male or female condom with spermicide, diaphragm, or sponge with spermicide (Note: Use of condom as the sole method of contraception is not considered to be a highly effective method of contraception).
A female participant must agree not to donate eggs (ova, oocytes) or freeze for future use for the purposes of assisted reproduction during the study * We will consider women to be of childbearing potential if they are within 2 years of menopause (within 3 years since last menstrual period) and have not had a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or other definitive surgical intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
Cynthia.Voghell@yale.edu203-737-4784
Milford, Connecticut 06461, United States
Trials@DepressionMD.com203-701-9737
Samuel.Wilkinson@yale.edu203-764-9131
404-712-6939
asbmd@athenacare.health615-426-0166
sarah@sprashadmd.com(832) 730 - 5196
Rebecca.Allen@seattlentc.com206-467-6300 ext. 5