Comparison of Two Different Excess Cement Clean-up Options for Cementing Metal-free Ceramic Restorations on Dental Implants
Comparison of Two Different Excess Cement Clean-up Options for Cementing Metal-free Ceramic Restorations on Dental Implants
This study quantitatively compared cement residues of two resin cement types around implant-supported restorations (ISR) with a crown-abutment margin located at the gingival level. This prospective, single-blinded, cross-over clinical trial compared optically detectable cement remnants between Self-Adhesive Resin Cement (RC) and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC).
This prospective, two-arm, non-randomized, clinical trial compared detectable cement remnants on 30 patients and 60 ISR. Two cements were compared; self-adhesive resin (RC) and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC). Comparisons were carried out on identical pairs of ISR tested within the same patients with a 1-week healing interval. The primary outcome variable was the ratio of cement-covered area to total crown area. Areas were analyzed ex-situ by standardized digital image analysis.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence of general conditions contributory to dental implant treatment comprising but not limited to: