Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cornerstone Clinics, Everett, WA | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The proposed study is designed to evaluate how foot loading changes during initial accommodation to a carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO), after targeted training with or without visual feedback of foot loading, and after take-home use of the CDO. This study will quantify initial offloading associated with CDO use and determine if visual feedback of foot loading and additional take-home use of the CDO can further reduce forces, as orthotists work to provide CDOs to patients.
This study is designed to evaluate the effects of initial accommodation, CDO related training, and take-home use on foot loading during gait. In this study, adult participants who experienced an injury below the knee and require a CDO will walk without the CDO, then with the CDO following initial prescription, after training with or without visual force feedback, and after additional take-home use of the CDO. Participants will be randomized to to training with or without visual feedback of foot loading forces.
Wireless force measuring sensors will be used to measure forces under the foot with and without the CDO at each time point. Participants will complete questionnaires to assess and compare various patient outcomes (e.g. pain, quality of life, comfort, satisfaction, and preference).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Visual Feedback | No Intervention | Participants will receive typical accommodation training after being prescribed the CDO. | |
| Provided Visual Feedback | Active Comparator | Participants will receive typical accommodation training with additional visual feedback after being prescribed the CDO. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Feedback | Other | Visual feedback of foot loading during gait. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Plantar Force (Forefoot) | Maximum force (N) collected from the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) during gait. | Baseline |
| Plantar Force Impulse (Forefoot) | Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk. | Baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Plantar Force (Midfoot) | Maximum force (N) collected from the midfoot (middle 30% of sensor) during gait. | Baseline |
| Plantar Force Impulse (Midfoot) | Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the midfoot (middle 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Modified Socket Comfort Score (Comfort) | Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable. | Baseline |
| Modified Socket Comfort Score (Smoothness) | Smoothness scores range from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth. |
Patient Inclusion criteria
Patient Exclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD | Contact | 319-335-6857 | jason-wilken@uiowa.edu | |
| Kirsten M Anderson, PhD | Contact | 319-353-0431 | kirsten-m-anderson@uiowa.edu |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Iowa | Active, not recruiting | Iowa City | Iowa | 52241 | United States | |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D056228 | Feedback, Sensory |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001676 | Biofeedback, Psychology |
| D001521 | Behavior Therapy |
| D011613 | Psychotherapy |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will either receive training with or without visual feedback of foot loading during gait.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will not be blinded to which study arm they are assigned.
Not provided
| Baseline |
| Peak Plantar Force (Hindfoot) | Maximum force (N) collected from the hindfoot (proximal 30% of sensor) during gait. | Baseline |
| Plantar Force Impulse (Hindfoot) | Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the hindfoot (proximal 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk. | Baseline |
| Peak Plantar Force (Total Foot) | Maximum force (N) collected from the total foot (100% of sensor) during gait. | Baseline |
| Plantar Force Impulse (Total Foot) | Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (100% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk. | Baseline |
| Baseline |
| Numerical Pain Rating Scale | Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. | Baseline |
| Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (Physical Function) | The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) physical function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring physical function. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the population average. | Baseline |
| Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (Pain Interference) | The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) pain interference Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring pain interference. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the population average. | Baseline |
| Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey - Satisfaction with Service | Satisfaction with services will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Services Score (10-50). Lower scores indicate a better outcome. | Baseline |
| Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey - Satisfaction with Device | Satisfaction with device will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Device Score (11-55). Lower scores indicate a better outcome. | Baseline |
| Cornerstone Prosthetics and Orthotics |
| Recruiting |
| Everett |
| Washington |
| 98225 |
| United States |
|
| D030141 | Feedback, Psychological |
| D025461 | Feedback, Physiological |
| D006706 | Homeostasis |
| D010829 | Physiological Phenomena |