Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this observational, cross-sectional study is to investigate and compare the impact of chronic pain and amputation on patients' quality of life. By excluding individuals with conditions that might influence quality of life, the study seeks to provide insights into how these two conditions affect physical and emotional well-being. Statistical methods will be employed to analyze the data. The primary research questions are as follows:
Is the quality of life of individuals with chronic pain lower than that of those with an amputation? Is the quality of life of individuals with chronic pain higher than that of those with an amputation? Is the quality of life of individuals with chronic pain similar to that of those with an amputation?
Chronic pain is a common, complex, and distressing public health issue that significantly impacts both individuals and society, affecting more than 30% of the global population. Each year, 1 in 10 people develop chronic pain, making it one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. It is also one of the primary reasons patients seek medical care. The economic burden of chronic pain rivals that of cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Chronic pain is a multidimensional health problem, influencing every aspect of patients' lives. It contributes to loss of function and is accompanied by physical, emotional, cognitive, psychosocial, and motivational challenges. Additionally, it is associated with reduced activity levels, impaired functionality, and a significant decline in quality of life.
Amputation, on the other hand, is a major trauma that results in profound changes to body structure and function, substantially affecting an individual's quality of life, both socially and professionally. It creates barriers to reintegration into work and social life, limiting active participation in society. Amputation has far-reaching impacts on quality of life, including body image concerns, loss of a sense of integrity, decreased self-esteem, a distorted body image, feelings of emptiness and worthlessness, difficulties with social adjustment, reduced sexual activity, anxiety, depression, social discomfort, and challenges in relationships and marriage.
Health is defined as a state of complete physical, social, and spiritual well-being. Both chronic pain and amputation impair individuals' health status due to limitations in physical and social functioning, mental health challenges, pain, and reduced health-related quality of life. While numerous studies have explored the quality of life associated with each condition, no study has directly compared the quality of life between individuals with chronic pain and those who have undergone amputation.
The aim of this study is to compare the quality of life of individuals with chronic pain to that of amputees, providing valuable insights into the unique and overlapping challenges faced by these patient groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with amputations | Patients with amputation who are over 18 years of age, have sufficient Turkish reading and comprehension skills, and have experienced at least one year since the amputation, excluding those with congenital amputations or chronic pain. | ||
| Patients with Chronic Pain | Patients with chronic pain who are over 18 years of age, have experienced pain for more than 3 months, and possess sufficient Turkish reading and comprehension skills. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Short Form -36 (SF-36) | The SF-36 is one of the most widely used generic tools for measuring quality of life.This scale evaluates eight health dimensions across 36 items: physical function, role limitations (due to physical and emotional problems), social function, mental health, vitality (energy), pain, and general health perception. The SF-36 offers several advantages, including its ability to assess both the positive and negative aspects of a health condition in just five minutes.It also demonstrates superior sensitivity in detecting subtle changes in disability compared to other scales. Instead of providing a single score, the SF-36 generates separate scores for each subscale, ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 100 indicates excellent health, while a score of 0 reflects poor health. It has been validated and found reliable in Turkish and is recommended for use across all physical disease groups to assess quality of life comprehensively. | From November 14 to December 17 |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with chronic pain and amputations will be recruited from the outpatient clinic of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baskent University Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Training Center | Adana | 01200 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided