The placebo powder is designed to mimic the appearance and taste of the NuBest Tall Growth Protein Powder but does not contain the active ingredients.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Parents were required to rate their child's overall health in the past four weeks. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor" ," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire, with the question "I expect my child will have a very healthy life". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire, whereby parents were asked to rate their child's overall health in the past 4 weeks. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Much worse," 5 = "Much Better"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "My child seems less healthy than other children". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "When something is going around my child usually catches it". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "I worry more about my child's health than other parents do their children". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

This parameter was assessed within the NuBest group using a child-completed cognitive assessment. Participants received a percentile score ranging from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. The overall score at each timepoint reflects performance on the cognitive test.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Feature Match is a focus and processing task. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Grammatical Reasoning is a deductive reasoning task that requires quickly interpreting phrases and making logical conclusions from understanding. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Digit Span requires users to focus on displayed numbers, hold them in short-term memory, and repeat them back correctly. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Leveraging the brain's executive functioning skills, Token Search requires participants to hold information in working memory and remain focused on completing sequential steps. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Feature Match is a focus and processing task. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Grammatical Reasoning is a deductive reasoning task that requires quickly interpreting phrases and making logical conclusions from understanding. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Digit Span requires users to focus on displayed numbers, hold them in short-term memory, and repeat them back correctly. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Leveraging the brain's executive functioning skills, Token Search requires participants to hold information in working memory and remain focused on completing sequential steps. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

Height measurement will be taken using an Ultrasonic Height Measuring Stadiometer. The increase in height will be tracked over the course of the study.

Height measurement will be taken using an Ultrasonic Height Measuring Stadiometer. The increase in height will be tracked over the course of the study.

Weight measurement will be taken using a FitBit Smart Scale.

Weight measurement will be taken using a FitBit Smart Scale.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Parents were required to rate their child's overall health in the past four weeks. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor" ," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor" ," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor" ," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor" ," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "My child seems less healthy than other children". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "When something is going around my child usually catches it". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "I worry more about my child's health than other parents do their children". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the NuBest group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Parents were required to rate their child's overall health in the past four weeks. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor" ," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the Placebo group only.

Hide Description:

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor" ," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor" ," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor" ," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "My child seems less healthy than other children". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the Placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "When something is going around my child usually catches it". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "I worry more about my child's health than other parents do their children". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter. This analysis summarizes the mean score at each timepoint for the placebo group only.

Total of all reporting groups

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Feature Match is a focus and processing task. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Grammatical Reasoning is a deductive reasoning task that requires quickly interpreting phrases and making logical conclusions from understanding. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Digit Span requires users to focus on displayed numbers, hold them in short-term memory, and repeat them back correctly. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Leveraging the brain's executive functioning skills, Token Search requires participants to hold information in working memory and remain focused on completing sequential steps. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

Height measurement will be taken using an Ultrasonic Height Measuring Stadiometer. The increase in height will be tracked over the course of the study.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

Weight measurement will be taken using a FitBit Smart Scale. Changes in weight will be analyzed across the groups.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Parents were required to rate their child's overall health in the past four weeks. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor" ," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire, with the question "I expect my child will have a very healthy life". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire, whereby parents were asked to rate their child's overall health in the past 4 weeks. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Much worse," 5 = "Much Better"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Very Poor," 5 = "Excellent"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). An increase in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "My child seems less healthy than other children". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "When something is going around my child usually catches it". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. The parents were asked to respond to the following statement "I worry more about my child's health than other parents do their children". Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed using a parent-completed questionnaire. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale with textual anchors and transformed into a numerical scale from 1 to 5, where a decrease in score indicates better outcomes (e.g., 1 = "Never," 5 = "Always"). A decrease in the mean score is associated with improvement in this parameter.

The number of participants analyzed at each time point reflects the available data from participants who completed assessments at that specific time point. The decreasing numbers are due to participant dropouts and missed measurements. All data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with results reported for all participants who provided data at each respective time point.

This parameter was assessed within the NuBest group using a child-completed cognitive assessment. Participants received a percentile score ranging from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. The overall score at each timepoint reflects performance on the cognitive test.

Within-group analysis. No between-group comparison reported for this outcome.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Feature Match is a focus and processing task. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

Within-group analysis. No between-group comparison reported for this outcome.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Grammatical Reasoning is a deductive reasoning task that requires quickly interpreting phrases and making logical conclusions from understanding. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

Within-group analysis. No between-group comparison reported for this outcome.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Digit Span requires users to focus on displayed numbers, hold them in short-term memory, and repeat them back correctly. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

Within-group analysis. No between-group comparison reported for this outcome.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Leveraging the brain's executive functioning skills, Token Search requires participants to hold information in working memory and remain focused on completing sequential steps. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

Within-group analysis. No between-group comparison reported for this outcome.

The primary outcome measure will assess the improvement in cognitive function as evaluated by a cognitive test. Participants received a percentile score (1-100) on the assessment, with a higher score indicating a better response.

Within-group analysis. No between-group comparison reported for this outcome.