Randomized Comparative Multicenter Phase III Study of a Strategy Integrating Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Versus Strategy Based on Monitoring in the Treatment of Carcinomas Spinocellular With High Risk of Recurrence
Randomized Comparative Multicenter Phase III Study of a Strategy Integrating Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Versus Strategy Based on Monitoring in the Treatment of Carcinomas Spinocellular With High Risk of Recurrence
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a strategy integrating adjuvant radiation therapy versus strategy based on monitoring in the treatment of carcinomas spinocellular with high risk of recurrence (SCC).
The investigators will compare the disease-free survival (DFS) of patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy versus surveillance in high risk of recurrence SCC.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Is DFS different between the "adjuvant radiotherapy" group and the "surveillance" group?
Participants will:
The use of adjuvant radiotherapy appears to provide clinical benefit, both theoretically and based on available retrospective data. This is why some patients already benefit from this complementary treatment. However, given the lack of prospective data, the use of adjuvant radiotherapy is based on heterogeneous criteria, depending on the choice of the clinician in charge of the patient or the habits of his institution.
The sponsor team therefore propose to conduct a national prospective study to compare the efficacy and safety of a strategy integrating adjuvant radiotherapy versus a strategy based on surveillance in patients with SCC at high risk of recurrence.
Considering that there is no validated standard after surgery for patients with a high risk of recurrence, it is not possible to determine a standard arm and an experimental arm. This study therefore falls within the framework of a Research Involving the Human Person of Category 2.
This protocol constitutes the first prospective evaluation of adjuvant radiotherapy, within the framework of a comparative study. This study will thus make it possible to avoid the use of this therapeutic alternative, without rigorous evaluation in a prospective framework. Its robust methodology will make it possible to determine whether adjuvant radiotherapy provides a clinical benefit to patients at high risk of recurrence. It will modify the standards of care for this patient population.
Inclusion Criteria:
I1. Patients aged ≥ 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form; I2. Patients with histologically confirmed localized cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma;
Note: Patients with carcinoma of the external auditory canal may be included in the study;
I3. Patients treated with complete surgical excision (R0), regardless of the margin (submillimeter or supramillimeter);
I4. Disease with a high risk of recurrence defined by one of the following scenarios:
Note: The risk factors considered are immunosuppression (limited to untreated hematologic disease), a tumor diameter >20 mm (longest axis, measured preferably clinically, or, failing that, histologically), a specific location (lip/ear/temple), deep invasion (tumor thickness >6 mm (Breslow) or invasion beyond the subcutaneous fat), poor differentiation, or desmoplasia;
I5. Patient informed and having signed a consent form to participate in the study; I6. Patient enrolled in a health insurance plan (or beneficiary of such a plan).
Exclusion Criteria:
NI1. Patients with in situ or mixed CEC; NI2. History of CEC with a high risk of recurrence in the same lymphatic drainage area (head and neck, trunk, or limb) within 2 years prior to the randomization date; NI3. History of CEC treated with systemic therapy; NI4. Patients with SCC localized to the endonasal, intraoral, anogenital, or vulvar mucosa;
NI5. Patients with recurrent SCC or SCC at very high risk of recurrence defined by one of the following criteria:
Note: Local treatment of cutaneous keratoses with fluoropyrimidines is permitted outside the theoretical radiation field);
NI9. Patient with a contraindication to radiation therapy; NI10. Patient with a history of radiation therapy to the site of the lesion; NI11. Participation in another clinical trial that may interfere with the assessment of the primary endpoint; NI12. Patient under legal guardianship or conservatorship, or deprived of liberty; NI13. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
julien.gautier@lyon.unicancer.fr+33 4.26.55.68.29
Pierre-Bénite, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 69495, France
emmanuel.mesny@chu-lyon.fr
nicolas.poulalhon@chu-lyon.fr04 78 86 45 69 ext. 04 78 86 13 29
Brest, Finistère 29200, France
Nantes, Loire-Atlantique 44093, France
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, MMeurthe-et-Moselle 54519, France
Roanne, Pays de la Loire Region 42300, France
amel.blanchard@ch-roanne.fr+33 4 77 44 32 77
Saint Priest En Jarez, Pays de la Loire Region 42271, France
elodie.guillaume@chu-st-etienne.fr+33 4 77 91 71 02
Rouen, Seine-Maritime 76031, France
f.skowron@hopitaux-drome-nord.fr+33 4 75 05 75 80
dr.guy@cmc-valence.org
fgrange@valence.fr+33 4 75 75 75 49
gurvan.dissaux@chu-brest.fr02 98 22 33 98
jdequatrebarbes@ch-annecygenevois.fr+33 4 50 63 68 63
monica.dinulescu@chu-rennes.fr
strabelsimessai@chu-grenoble.fr+33 4 76 76 66 16
bensgui@ch-blois.fr
gaelle.quereux@chu-nantes.fr+33 2 40 08 31 44
s.renard@nancy.unicancer.fr+33 3 83 59 86 10
c.jacobzoneleveque@ghbs.bzh+33 6 16 98 31 79
emilie.gerard@chu-bordeaux.fr05 56 79 47 05 ext. 05 56 79 49 75
marie.beylot-barry@chu-bordeaux.fr05 57 82 25 00
p.lesueur@cglc.fr02 35 13 66 13
r.mallet@cglc.fr02 35 13 66 13
Damien.giacchero@gmail.com04 93 86 73 68
Dorian.culie@nice.unicancer.fr04 92 03 17 89
smansard@chu-clermontferrand.fr+33 4 73 75 05 50
anne-benedicte.duval-modeste@chu-rouen.fr+33 2 32 88 81 41
mona.amini-adle@lyon.unicancer.fr+33 4 78 78 59 96