Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Falls are the primary cause of fatal and non-fatal accidental injuries in older adults. Around a third of community-dwelling older adults fall per year with high associated personal and societal costs. The World Falls Prevention Guidelines recommend balance challenging, functional exercise programmes for falls prevention but there can be low uptake and adherence in community settings. A digital, NHS approved programme Keep-On-Keep-Up (KOKU) was co-developed with older adults and therapists, to provide progressive, evidence-based exercises and to raise awareness of home hazards and ways to improve bone health, nutrition and hydration. This trial aims to investigate the effectiveness of the KOKU digital strength and balance programme for improving balance, function and reducing falls risk in community dwelling older adults.
Objective:
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an NHS (National Health Service) approved, digital falls prevention intervention; (Keep On Keep Up (KOKU) - see https://kokuhealth.com) for improving balance, maintaining function and reducing falls risk in community dwelling older adults.
Design:
A two-arm randomised controlled trial.
Participants and setting:
Community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and older.
Interventions:
Digital 12-week strength and balance programme, plus standard care (falls prevention exercises advice and leaflet) against standard care only.
Main outcome measures:
The primary outcome measure is balance function at 12 weeks post-baseline, as assessed by the Berg Balance scale (BBS). Secondary outcomes include: healthcare utilisation and health-related quality of life, fear of falling, mobility, self-reported physical activity, falls risk, pain, mood, fatigue, and self-reported falls over a 3-month period. Randomisation will take place after participants are recruited and baseline data is collected.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOKU | Experimental | A maximum of 196 participants will be recruited to participate in the study, across sites in Greater Manchester and Lancashire, UK. Participants will be randomised into either;
|
|
| FaME/OTAGO | Active Comparator | A maximum of 196 participants will be recruited to participate in the study, across sites in Greater Manchester and Lancashire, UK. Participants will be randomised into either;
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOKU | Other | KOKU is a digital strength and balance programme designed to prevent physical decline and frailty KOKU provides access to personalised, progressive strength and balance exercises. More information can be found at: https://kokuhealth.com/ |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Berg Balance Scale (BBS) | The primary outcome measure is balance function as measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The BBS is a 14-item scale designed to measure balance of the older adult in a clinical setting. Each item consists of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function and takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. The total score equals 56. Score of < 45 indicates individuals may be at greater risk of falling (Berg et al., 1992). | 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ5D-5L) | The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) measures health-related quality of life and consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient selects the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions which results in a 1-digit number for the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. Minimum score is -0.285 and maximum score is 1. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Emma Stanmore, PhD | The University of Manchester | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University of Manchester | Manchester | Greater Manchester | M13 9PL | United Kingdom | ||
| University of Manchester |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Keep On Keep Up (KOKU) | View source |
| Fitness and Mobility Exercises (FaME) | View source |
| OTAGO Exercise Programme (OEP) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A two-arm randomised controlled trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| FaME / OTAGO leaflet and AGE UK Stay Steady Leaflet | Other | A leaflet with information on a combination of strength and balance exercises and walking programs, performed on a weekly basis by older adults at home, or community settings. The exercises can be done individually or in a group setting and are aimed at reducing falls in older adults. More information can be found at: https://fameexercise.com/ and https://www.livestronger.org.nz/assets/Uploads/acc1162-otago-exercise-manual.pdf https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/health-wellbeing/exercise/staying-steady-download-page/#:\~:text=This%20guide%20outlines%20things%20you%20can |
|
|
| 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion) |
| 5-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) | Mood will be assessed using the 5-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). This screening tool for depression in older adults is validated for older adults in a wide range of settings (Hoyl et al., 1999). The scale ranges from minimum score of 0 indicating no depression to 5 indicating higher level of depressive symptoms. | 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion) |
| Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) | To assess the participant's physical activity levels. The PASE score theoretically ranges from 0 indicating no physical activity to a maximum score of over 400 (depending on the intensity, frequency and duration of the activities) indicating greater levels of physical activity. | 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion) |
| Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) | To assess confidence in performing activities of daily living without falling.(concerns about falling). The scale ranges from 7 to 28 with 7 as the minimum score indicating no concerns about falling and 28 is the maximum score indicating severe concern about falling. | 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion) |
| Five times Sit to Stand Test | The 5-times Sit-to-Stand Test assesses lower body strength, lower limb power, and functional mobility. It measures the time in seconds taken to complete five consecutive sit-to-stand movements as quickly as possible from a seated position. There are no fixed minimum or maximum scores in time, higher scores indicate worse performance. For older adults a time greater than 12 seconds is often used as a threshold indicating an increased risk of falls or mobility limitations. | Baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks |
| Assessment of Falls Risk Tool (FRAT) | To assess risk of falls, 0 is the minimum score indicating no or very low risk of falls and 20 is the maximum score indicating a very high risk of falls. | 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion) |
| System Usability Scale (SUS) | To assess the usability of KOKU. The SUS provides a score between 0 and 100 with 0 the minimum score indicating poor usability and 100 the maximum score indicating excellent usability. | 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion) |
| Theoretical Framework for Acceptability (TFA) | To assess the usability of KOKU. The TFA is reported qualitatively to capture a detailed understanding of acceptability in healthcare settings. | 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion) |
| 12 Item Short Scale for Measuring Technology Commitment | To assess the usability of KOKU. The 12 Item Short Scale for Measuring Technology Commitment follows a likert-type scale (ranging 1 to 5 for each item). The total score is then calculated by summing the items. The minimum score is 12 representing the lowest commitment to technology and the maximum score is 60 indicating highest level of commitment to technology. | 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion) |
| The Short Version of the User Experience Question | To assess the usability of KOKU. The Short Version of the User Experience Question (UEQ) is composed of 6 dimensions of user experience (attractiveness, efficiency, perspicuity, dependability, stimulation and novelty) rated on a 7 point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7. The minimum score is 6 indicating low user experience and the maximum score is 42 indicating high user experience. | 0 Weeks (baseline), 6 weeks and 12 weeks (study completion) |
| Manchester |
| Greater Manchester |
| M13 9PL |
| United Kingdom |