Real-life Evaluation of the Efficacy of Biologicals in CRSwNP
Real-life Evaluation of the Efficacy of Biologicals in CRSwNP
The goal of this observational study is to learn more about the real-world efficacy of biologics in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). All patients who are 18 years or older, who have CRSwNP and are eligible for reimbursement of a biological for the indication of CRSwNP can be included.
The main question is the efficacy of biologics in real life after 24 weeks. The main focus are patient reported outcomes measured via several questionnaires and the nasal polyp score, scored with nasal endoscopy.
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has a prevalence of 5-10% in adults. It is often associated with other comorbidities, such as asthma (30-70% of CRSwNP patients) and aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) (16% of CRSwNP patients) leading to a significant reduced quality of life (QoL). CRSwNP is diagnosed in patients with nasal polyps who have 2 or more of the following symptoms for more than 12 weeks:
Biologicals are a specific kind of treatment with recombinant DNA-derived humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds specific targets in the inflammatory cascade which contributes to the pathophysiology of CRSwNP. Different biologicals have already been reimbursement for the treatment of Asthma for years, slowly these biologicals start to get their approval and reimbursement for CRSwNP. In Belgium (omalizumab (Xolair®), mepolizumab (Nucala®) and dupilumab (Dupixent ®) are reimbursed for patients with CRSwNP. Their efficacy has been demonstrated through large double-blind placebo-controlled clinical studies. However, until now only very limited reports on real-world data regarding this therapy have been published. This real-world data is important because it enables us to go beyond data gathered throughout a traditional randomised controlled trial (RCT). Traditional RCTs gather data from a controlled sample population with limited comorbidities and concomitant medications, who are likely to be compliant with the study requirements, whereas in real life patients might have poorer performance status and compliance and consist of a higher proportion of elderly patients.
Therefore, this real-world data study aims to investigate how clinical outcomes of biologic therapy in real-world application (real-world efficacy) corresponds to outcomes in clinical trials (efficacy) and to look into factors that might explain an efficacy gap.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Patients treated with other biological therapies in the 3 months prior to the current biological (this is not applicable to patients who are in the trial and switch biological).
elien.borgers@uzleuven.be003216342037
an-sofie.viskens@kuleuven.be003216348187
Aalst, 9300, Belgium
b.verhaeghe@yahoo.com+3253728524
kato.speleman@azsintjan.be+3250 45 22 80
valerie.hox@saintluc.uclouvain.be+322 764 19 42
olivier.vanderveken@uza.be+32 3 821 30 00
winde.lemmens@zol.be+3289/32.50.50
stijn.halewyck@uzbrussel.be+322 477 60 02
elien.borgers@uzleuven.be+3216/34.20.37
s.camby@chuliege.be+32474415961