Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Aged- related changes in upper airway anatomy may affect the overall performance of supraglottic airways significantly. In this study, investigator aim to compare the clinical performance, efficacy, and associated complications of the Proseal Laryngeal Mask and the Air-Q Intubation Laryngeal Airway in elderly patients.
Elderly patients are vulnerable to perioperative pulmonary complications during intubation and extubation. Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) have been utilized as a relatively easy method of airway management for resuscitation and difficult intubations and are used during elective general anesthesia with reduced airway complications compared to endotracheal intubation. SADs may help maintain hemodynamic stability as they require less anesthetic agents compared to endotracheal intubation. With aging, parapharyngeal fat accumulation increases, leading to pharyngeal collapse in elderly patients. Additionally, structural changes in the respiratory tract combined with physiological alterations in respiration may reduce oxygen saturation, blunt the hypoxic response, and increase postoperative respiratory complications. Acquired changes in pharyngeal muscle activity with age are thought to increase the likelihood of bony structural changes, such as retrognathia, which is typically considered a difficult airway. Therefore, these age-related changes may impact the clinical performance of SADs. ProSeal LMA is one of the most commonly used supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice. It was developed by modifying the classic LMA in the 2000s and features an inflatable cuff. Additionally, it has a gastric channel for gastric aspiration adjacent to the airway tube. Recently, SGAs (supraglottic airways) that do not require manual cuff inflation have been increasingly used in various clinical situations due to the advantages of eliminating manual cuff inflation and monitoring cuff pressure. Air-Q connects to an airway tube via a communication port that allows self-regulation of cuff pressure in response to airway pressure. In this study, investigator aim to compare the clinical performance, efficacy, and associated complications of the Proseal Laryngeal Mask and the Air-Q Intubation Laryngeal Airway in elderly patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SP AİR Q group | Other | under general anesthesia, patients inserted Air- Q intubating airway. |
|
| Proseal Group | Other | under general anesthesia, patients inserted proseal laryngeal mask. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air-Q Intubating Airway | Other | Patients will be inserted Air-Q Intubating Airway under general anesthesia |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) | One minute after successful LMA placement and fixation, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) will be measured by setting the adjustable pressure limiting valve (APL) to 40 mmHg and maintaining a fresh gas flow of 3 L/min. The OLP will be recorded as the pressure at which an audible leak sound is heard from the mouth. | One minute after successful LMA placement |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| SP Air-Q and proseal LMA insertion time | Successful LMA placement will be confirmed by visualizing a square waveform on the ventilator and observing chest wall movement. | 3 minutes after induction of anesthesia |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ease of LMA placement | he ease of LMA placement will be scored by the anesthesiologist on a scale from 1 to 4 (1: Successful on the first attempt with no resistance from the tissues; 2: Successful on the first attempt but with some tissue resistance during placement; 3: Moderate tissue resistance; 4: Failure to place the LMA). | 3 minutes after induction of anesthesia |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeynep Koç | Yenimahalle | Ankara | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26634080 | Background | Kim EM, Kim MS, Koo BN, Lee JR, Lee YS, Lee JH. Clinical efficacy of the classic laryngeal mask airway in elderly patients: a comparison with young adult patients. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Dec;68(6):568-74. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.568. Epub 2015 Nov 25. | |
| 30343563 | Result | In CB, Cho SA, Lee SJ, Sung TY, Cho CK. Comparison of the clinical performance of airway management with the i-gel(R) and laryngeal mask airway SupremeTM in geriatric patients: a prospective and randomized study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Feb;72(1):39-46. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00121. Epub 2018 Oct 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010612 | Pharyngitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| proseal laryngeal mask | Other | Patients will be inserted proseal laryngeal mask under general anesthesia. |
|
| maneuvers required for successful ventilation | It will be recorded whether any further maneuvers are required: Gentle pushing or pulling of the LMA to adjust its depth, jaw-thrust maneuver, and flexion or extension of the head. | 3 minutes after induction of anesthesia |
| fiberoptic view grading | The Brimacombe score will be used to evaluate the view obtained with fiberoptic bronchoscopy. 1: Vocal cords are not visible; 2: Vocal cords and anterior epiglottis are visible; 3: Vocal cords and posterior epiglottis are visible; 4: Vocal cords are visible. | 3 minutes after induction of anesthesia |
| Complications during SP_Air-Q and propseal LMA removal (emerge) | Complications during SP_Air-Q and proseal LMA removal (emerge) such as breath-holding during emergence, airway obstruction, coughing, hypoxia (SpO2 < 90%), vomiting, lip-tongue-teeth trauma, and bleeding, will be recorded. | One minute after SP Air-Q removal |
| Sore throat | The presence or absence of sore throat will be recorded at the firsth postoperative hour. | 1 hour postoperatively |
| Sore throat | The presence or absence of sore throat will be recorded at the 24th postoperative hour | 24 hours postoperatively |
| dysphonia | The presence or absence of dysphonia will be recorded at the firsth postoperative hour | 1 hour postoperatively |
| dysphonia | The presence or absence of dysphonia will be recorded at the 24th postoperative hour. | 24 hours postoperatively |
| 30320644 | Result | Lee JS, Kim DH, Choi SH, Ha SH, Kim S, Kim MS. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of the i-gel and the Self-Pressurized air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Elderly Anesthetized Patients. Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):480-487. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003849. |
| 34092859 | Result | Wahba RM, Ragaei MZ, Metry AA, Nakhla GM. Supraglottic Airway Devices for Elective Pediatric Anesthesia: I-gel versus Air-Q, Which is the Best? Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):461-466. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_107_20. Epub 2021 Mar 22. |
| D010608 | Pharyngeal Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |