Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
amendment in study design / stopping the trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
While early implant placement with guided bone regeneration (GBR) offers advantages, the desire for reduced treatment time and fewer surgical steps continues to drive the exploration of alternative approaches. In this context, the recent introduction of vestibular socket therapy (VST) presents an intriguing option. VST utilizes a minimally invasive tunnel access technique through the vestibular area to perform socket augmentation for immediate implant placement in compromised extraction sockets .
The concept of immediate implant placement has been around for a while. Professor Wilfried Schulte conducted the first study on this technique in 1978, Extensive studies conducted over the past 40 years have demonstrated that immediate implant placement is a safe and effective method for restoring teeth that are badly destructed.
While immediate implant placement has been shown as a viable option, new studies using advanced imaging techniques (cone beam CT scans) reveal limitations in the front upper jaw (anterior maxilla).
These findings highlight the main concerns with immediate implants in the front upper jaw:
researchers like Buser et al. propose a treatment option that offers documented long-term predictability for achieving good aesthetic outcomes. This approach involves:
This alternative approach addresses the challenges of immediate implant placement in cases with missing facial bone walls in the front upper jaw, while offering a predictable and aesthetically pleasing long-term solution.
A recent studies compared an alternative approach to the contour augmentation technique. The technique is the novel vestibular socket therapy proposed by ELaskary et al.
The findings suggest VST may be a viable option for these situations, offering comparable bone formation and improved soft tissue stability while streamlining the treatment process with fewer surgical interventions.
The study found that VST offered several advantages:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| control group (contour augmentation | Active Comparator | Teeth extraction : minimally invasive adjacent teeth extraction under anesthesia using periotome and forceps. the empty sockets will be filled with a special collagen material (BioPlug) to aid healing for 4 to 8 weeks. flap elevation : a full-thickness flap will be carefully raised using a crestal incision extended one tooth mesial and distal to the extraction location, then connected with two vertical incisions extended through the sulcus forming a trapezoid flap. Implants Insertion: The two implant is then placed into the prepared sockets using surgical guide. Bone Grafting: Any bone deficiencies are addressed by grafting. This involves placing a layer of (autogenous bone) directly on the two implants' surface, followed by a layer of a bone-grafting material (Demineralized Bone Matrix). Membrane Placement: A double-layered collagen membrane is used to cover the grafted area. Flap Closure: The previously lifted flap is repositioned and sutured back in place. |
|
| study group (VST) | Active Comparator |
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vestibular socket therapy | Procedure | atraumatic extraction to the hopeless teeth will be performed using periotomes followed by conventional forceps under local anesthesia.
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Soft Tissue Stability | it will be measured digitally using the intraoral scanner. A preoperative scanning, immediate postoperative, 3 months postoperative and 6 months postoperative scanning will be done. Tool to be used: 3shape trios 4 what will be assessed:
| 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Bone Regeneration | measuring the thickness of the labial plate of bone. It will be measured preoperatively, immediate postoperative to measure the amount of the augmented bone, 3 months postoperatively and 6 months post operative. Tool to be used: cone beam computed tomography (cbct) | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pink Esthetic Score (PES) | The PES is based on seven variables: mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft tissue color and soft tissue texture. Each variable will be assessed with a 2-1-0 score, with 2 being the best and 0 being the poorest score. | 6 months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Gamaleldin ahmed youssef, BDS | The British University in Egypt | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The British university in Egypt | Cairo | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|