ICEMAN (Intelligent Choice of Excision Margin): A Randomized Controlled Trial of Narrow Excision Versus Wide Excision for Adults With Primary Invasive Cutaneous Melanomas
ICEMAN (Intelligent Choice of Excision Margin): A Randomized Controlled Trial of Narrow Excision Versus Wide Excision for Adults With Primary Invasive Cutaneous Melanomas
This clinical trial compares the effect of a narrow surgical excision (removal) to a wide excision for the treatment of adults with invasive cutaneous melanoma. Currently the standard of care is to take wide margins (boarder of healthy tissue surrounding the melanoma) when removing melanoma. Narrow margin excision removes a smaller amount of healthy tissue when surgically removing the melanoma. Narrow margin excision may be effective in removing the melanoma while also reducing surgical complications and improving quality of life for adults with invasive cutaneous melanoma.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare the 3-year local recurrence-free survival rates (RFS) in melanoma patients treated with narrow excision versus (vs) wide excision.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To measure the 3-, 5-year Regional (nodal) disease-free survival (DFS) in melanoma patients treated with active nodal surveillance.
II. To compare 5-year local recurrence-free survival in patients treated with narrow vs wide excision.
III. To compare 5-year Melanoma Specific Survival (MSS) in patients treated with narrow vs wide excision.
IV. To compare the quality of life in patients treated with narrow vs wide excision.
V. To compare surgical complication rates in patients treated with narrow vs wide excision.
VI. To compare the frequency of complex reconstruction in patients treated with narrow vs wide excision.
VII. To compare the final defect size in patients treated with narrow vs wide excision.
VIII. To compare the number of operative/procedure days required to achieve negative margins.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. To measure the T- and B-cell repertoires in patients with melanoma over time.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo narrow margin excision on study. Patients may optionally undergo blood sample collection throughout the study.
ARM II: Patients undergo wide margin excision on study. Patients may optionally undergo blood sample collection throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 week, 3, 6, 12, 36, 48, and 60 months.
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants or legally authorized representatives (LAR) must provide written informed consent before any study-specific procedures or interventions are performed
Age ≥ 18 years; all biological gender identities and racial/ethnic groups will be included
Participants must have histologically confirmed primary cutaneous melanoma. Acral melanomas are eligible.
Participants must have one of the following:
American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Ed clinical stage IA disease with Breslow thickness > 0.5 mm AND at least one high-risk feature (Mitotic rate ≥ 2/mm2, age ≤ 42, lymphovascular invasion, head/neck location)
AJCC 8th Ed Clinical Stage IB melanoma
The index melanoma must be classified as low risk on the Merlin Assay (SkylineDx)
Study intervention (surgery) must be completed within 120 days of the original diagnostic biopsy
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2 (Karnofsky ≥ 50%)
Patients with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen are eligible for this trial
Participants with a history of HIV infection are eligible
Participants can speak, read and write in English or Spanish
Exclusion Criteria:
smitpaig@ohsu.edu503-418-4268
Davis, California 95817, United States
dbeisen@health.ucdavis.edu
Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
leah.winer@uky.edu
thulett@med.umich.edu
Bryan.Carroll@UHhospitals.org
smitpaig@ohsu.edu503-418-4268