Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| L2071 | Other Identifier | IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goals of this observational study are:
Subjects A total of 70 patients from the Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Osteoarticular Infections (CRIO) and the Hip Units of IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi -Sant'Ambrogio for suspected infection of their prosthesis will be enrolled in the study. Each sample will be analized with both traditional culture and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS).
On the basis of culture results patients will be divided into 3 groups.
Sample collection for Molecular analysis Sampling from peri-prosthetic tissue with macroscopic signs of infection will be taken from the synovial membrane, bone-prosthetic interface and intramedullary canals. Synovial fluid will be sterilely collected in DNAse and RNAse free containers for NGS analysis before performing the arthrotomy. Sterile swabs and pads will be used to collect samples from interface between tissue and bone implant and from intramedullary canal for NGS analysis. Bone tissue will be collected with new sterile instrumentation. Samples will be frozen within 2 hours from collection at -80°C until .
Sample collection for culture Sample collection of periprosthetic tissues and implant will be performed during the surgery after the proper exposure of the affected site. Synovial fluid will be collected in sterile screw cap tubes. Periprosthetic tissues and implant will be collected in sterile containers by using new sterile instrumentation. All samples will be sent to the Laboratory within 2 hours from collection. Samples after treatment with 0.1% (w:v) Dithiothreitol to dislodge bacteria from biofilm will be cultured on agar plates and broth for aerobes and anaerobes for 15 days. Microbial identification will be performed by biochemical assays.
A further tissue sample, collected in a separate sterile screw cap tube, will be used for host DNA removal to isolate microbial DNA, for shotgun NGS. Samples will be treated with saponin and/or different commercial kits for microbial DNA extraction. The dsDNA will be quantified with a Qubit fluorometer, and its purity will be determined with a nanodrop spectophotometer.
Synovial fluid analysis Synovial fluid for leukocyte count and differential will be collected in EthylenDiaminoTetraAcetic Acid (EDTA) containing tubes and analyzed by means of a Sysmex XN haematological analyser.
Determination of synovial protein, glucose, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and leukocyte esterase will be performed on synovial fluid collected in clot activator containing tubes. Measurement of proteins, glucose and CRP will be carried out on Atellica CH and IM analyser (Siemens) while leukocyte esterase was determined by used of strips for urinalysis.
Molecular analysis 70 samples will be sent to a specialized laboratory which will perform nucleic acid extraction from biological specimen types using tailored proprietary techniques that include concentrating cellular material, mechanical lysis, and removing organic inhibitors and human host DNA. Every specimen will be processed with a positive and negative extraction control to assure quality.
At the end of the study any residual biological material will be destroyed
Statistical methodology Sample size The sample size has been calculated considering as the primary outcome the agreement of the innovative molecular method and the traditional culture of periprostethic tissue and synovial fluid in defining a patients as positive or negative for prosthetic joint infections . Based on investigators experience, the proportion of patients, undergoing revision surgery for knee and hip implant failure in IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio with diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection based on cultural exam is of 45%. Considering a margin of error of 15%, an alpha = 0.05 and power = 80%, the number of patients to be tested is 70.
Analysis methodology Categorical data will be described as absolute and relative frequencies, while continuous data will be described as mean and 95%-confidence interval, if normally distributed, or as median and interquartile range, in case of non-normal distribution. Normal distribution will be assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test.
Differences in proportion will be evaluated by Fisher's exact test or Chi-squared test; continuous variable comparison among the three groups will be performed using One-Way Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) test for normally distributed data or with Kruskal-Wallis test, in case of non-normal distribution.
Agreement between molecular methods with traditional culture of periprostethic tissue and synovial fluid will be tested using Choen's kappa.
Sensitivity and specificity of each assay will be also assessed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Patients with diagnosis of infection confirmed by culture results | ||
| Group B | Patients with diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection according to criteria of the MusculoSkeletal Infection Society (MSIS) but with negative culture | ||
| Group C | Patients with no evidence of prosthetic joint infection according to criteria of MusculoSkeletal Infection Society (MSIS) (negative controls) |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Concordance between analytical methods | Concordance between methods will be analyzed by
| 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Definition of an algorithm for laboratory diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections | Results will be used for development of an algorithm for definition of workflow for diagnosis of prostehtic joint infections | 36 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of different protocols for microbial DNA extraction | Different commercial kit for microbial DNA extraction will be assessed in order to define an accurate and efficient protocol for microbial DNA extraction from periprosthetic tissues | 18 months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 70 patients from the Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Osteoarticular Infections (CRIO) and the Hip Units of IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi -Sant'Ambrogio for suspected infection of their prosthesis will be enrolled in the study.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio | Milan | Milano | 20157 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36074890 | Background | Kullar R, Chisari E, Snyder J, Cooper C, Parvizi J, Sniffen J. Next-Generation Sequencing Supports Targeted Antibiotic Treatment for Culture Negative Orthopedic Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 13;76(2):359-364. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac733. | |
| 37887186 | Background | Tsikopoulos K, Meroni G. Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: A Narrative Review. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;12(10):1485. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101485. |
Not provided
Not provided
Only data useful for publication will be made avalilable
IPD will be avalable form the end of the study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 37925748 | Background | Salar-Vidal L, Chaves C, Dianzo-Delgado IT, Favier P, Giner-Almaraz S, Gomez-Gomez MJ, Martin-Gutierrez G, Pereira I, Rodriguez-Fernandez A, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Salas-Venero C, Esteban J. Multicenter evaluation of BioFire JI panel related to improved microbiological diagnostics on acute osteoarticular infections. Int J Med Microbiol. 2023 Nov;313(6):151588. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2023.151588. Epub 2023 Oct 31. |
| 28750797 | Background | Villa F, Toscano M, De Vecchi E, Bortolin M, Drago L. Reliability of a multiplex PCR system for diagnosis of early and late prosthetic joint infections before and after broth enrichment. Int J Med Microbiol. 2017 Sep;307(6):363-370. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 18. |
| 20309657 | Background | Mortazavi SM, Schwartzenberger J, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Revision total knee arthroplasty infection: incidence and predictors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug;468(8):2052-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1308-6. |
| 30533595 | Background | Tan TL, Kheir MM, Shohat N, Tan DD, Kheir M, Chen C, Parvizi J. Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Update on What to Expect. JB JS Open Access. 2018 Jul 12;3(3):e0060. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00060. eCollection 2018 Sep 25. |
| 36858132 | Background | Murphy MP, MacConnell AE, Killen CJ, Schmitt DR, Wu K, Hopkinson WJ, Brown NM. Prevention Techniques Have Had Minimal Impact on the Population Rate of Prosthetic Joint Infection for Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A National Database Study. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1131-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.059. Epub 2023 Feb 27. |