Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficiency of two fertilization techniques used in Assisted Reproduction: conventional In Vitro fertilization (cIVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), in terms of in-vitro and clinical results, in non-male infertility patients, comparing them in sibling oocytes.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does ICSI result in better fertilization rate, blastocyst rate or usable blastocyst rate? Does ICSI result in better pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates?
Researchers will compare cIVF to ICSI in sibling oocytes to assess if a technique offers better results.
Participants undergoing an IVF/ICSI cycle will have their oocytes randomly divided in two groups: the oocytes from one group will be fertilized using cIVF and the oocytes from the other group using ICSI.
It is a prospective randomized study performed in the Reproduction Unit of Hospital Clinico San Carlos, in Madrid.
The study involves In Vitro Fertilization cycles with at least 6 oocytes retrieved and with normal semen parameters according to WHO.
The objective is to compare conventional In Vitro Fertilization (cIVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) in sibling oocytes from the same cohort.
The oocytes obtained after the ovum pick up will be randomly divided in two groups and the fertilization technique (cIVF or ICSI) will be randomly assigned to each group.
Maturity stage, fertilization and embryo development to blastocyst will be individually recorded for every oocyte. Additionally, the destination of every embryo (transferred, cryopreserved or discarded) will be registered. This decision will be based just on embryo quality, irrespective of the fertilization technique.
MII rate, blastocyst rate and usable blastocyst (transferred or cryopreserved) rate will be calculated for each group.
Additionally, embryo transfers will be performed in the fresh cycle or in the associated thaw cycles using the cryopreserved embryos. In every transfer, the technique used to obtain the transferred embryo will be registered.
The results of the embryo transfers will be recorded as pregnancy (positive beta-hCG 14 days after transfer), clinical pregnancy (diagnosed by ultrasonographic visualization of a gestational sac 4 weeks after transfer, including ectopic pregnancy) and live birth delivery (deliveries with at least one live birth). Pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth delivery rate will be calculated for each group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| conventional IVF (cIVF) | Active Comparator | The oocytes of this arm will be fertilized using conventional In Vitro Fertilization (cIVF) |
|
| Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) | Active Comparator | The oocytes of this arm will be fertilized using Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| conventional in vitro fertilization | Procedure | Fertilization via conventional In Vitro Fertilization |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Usable blastocyst rate | Percentage of oocytes that develop to blastocyst stage and are transferred of cryopreserved | From oocyte retrieval to 6 days after |
| Fertilization rate | Percentage of oocytes that show normal fertilization | From oocyte retrieval to 24 hours later |
| Blastocyst rate | Percentage of oocytes that develop to blastocyst stage | From oocyte retrieval to 6 days after |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy rate | Percentage of embryo transfers that has a positive beta-hCG 14 days post-transfer | From embryo transfer to 14 days later |
| Clinical pregnancy rate | Percentage of transfers that have a gestational sac observed 4 weeks post-transfer |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Clinico San Carlos | Madrid | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.
Who will be able to access the IPD: Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ("learned intermediary") identified for this purpose.
For what type of analysis: For individual participant data meta-analysis. How they will be able to access: Proposals should be directed to mariadolores.cuquerella@salud.madrid.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Not provided
Not provided
Oocytes obtained from every participant are divided in two groups and each group is randomly allocated to one of the two techniques that we want to analyze. So, there are not two groups of participants but two groups of oocytes from every participan
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) | Procedure | Fertilization via intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
|
| From embryo transfer to 4 weeks later |
| Live birth delivery rate | Percentage of transfers that end with the delivery of at least one live baby | From embryo transfer to 40 weeks later |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003226 | Congresses as Topic |
| D005307 | Fertilization in Vitro |
| D020554 | Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009938 | Organizations |
| D004472 | Health Care Economics and Organizations |
| D027724 | Reproductive Techniques, Assisted |
| D012099 | Reproductive Techniques |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided