Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2024-07400 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| American Cancer Society, Inc. | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical trial develops and tests how well a multi-level intervention (MLI), The Ohio State University (OSU) SCREEN Community Program, works to increase screening and follow-up for breast, cervical and colorectal (CRC) cancer among low-income and un/underinsured female residents in three counties in Central Ohio. In Ohio, incidence and mortality rates for breast, cervical and CRC are higher than or similar to the national average; in addition, underserved populations - minority, rural and low-income women - have higher rates of these cancers. Screening can detect precancerous colorectal and cervical lesions and other early-stage cancers when treatment is less intensive and more successful and is known to reduce mortality rates for breast, cervical, and CRC, however many of these women lack access to health care and screenings. This MLI includes clinic-based components, such as patient education, as well as community-based strategies, such as media programs and training health workers, that can increase rates of guideline-recommended breast, cervical and CRC screening and follow-ups in underserved populations. The OSU SCREEN Community Program may be an effective way to improve breast, cervical and CRC screenings among underserved women in Ohio.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Understand local factors and context relevant to breast, cervical and CRC screening and follow-up (including referral-to-care) and develop an MLI planning and implementation pathway for use by partner health centers and communities (Year 1).
II. Pilot test and further refine the MLI planning and implementation process in one clinic (Years 1 & 2).
III. Test the final MLI planning and implementation process in a group randomized, delayed intervention trial to assess the impact of the customized MLI on increasing rates of guideline recommended breast, cervical and CRC screening and follow-up for abnormal tests (Years 2, 3 and 4).
IV. Assess sustainability of the MLI (Years 4 and 5).
OUTLINE:
PHASE I (PLANNING): Providers and community members review MLI materials and participate in focus groups and interviews to discuss challenges to being screened, what community members know about cancer and screening and what should be included in a program to increase screening over 30-60 minutes on study. A clinic champion will be identified during the interview to lead, advise, and oversee the implementation of the MLI at their clinic location.
PHASE II (PILOT): Participants are assigned to 1 of 4 arms.
ARM I (HEALTH CLINICS): The clinic champion coordinates planning sessions, staff training, and overall implementation and planning for the MLI within each health clinic. Health clinics may integrate new activities into usual clinic processes such as the use of the electronic health record (EHR) to identify age-eligible patients in need of breast, cervical and/or CRC screening, reminder systems built into the EHR that can be sent to both providers and patients for screening and follow-up, and EHR information alerts for providers about patients who have positive fecal immunochemical test (FITs) or a positive Pap test or mammogram on study. Additionally, health clinics may incorporate risk assessments (via paper or within the EHR) for all patients eligible for breast, cervical and/or CRC screening, promote screening via web-based or health portal messaging, promote annual wellness visits (during which screening should be discussed), and offer incentives for completing needed cancer screening on study.
ARM II (HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS): Providers participate in educational sessions that include self-administered pre-test surveys and discussions that assess screening knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and practices, over one hour on study. Providers may also undergo coaching calls and one-on-one discussions to help tailor information and its delivery to the needs of providers and practices and are taught how to use clinic-based scheduling and reminder systems to help facilitate screening and follow-up actions.
ARM III (PATIENTS): Patients receive educational materials about screening and screening recommendations via mail and during in-person visits, and a web link for the developed small media website on study. Patients participate in discussions about screening and are offered any test for which they are not up to date and appropriate follow-up is conducted by designated staff on study. Patients who choose to undergo testing and receive a positive result receive a letter from the clinic and a call from the designated clinic staff member on study.
ARM IV (COMMUNITY): Communities receive educational materials (e.g., posters) and outreach activities to promote screening (e.g., health fairs, farmers' markets, inflatable colon tours, community seminars) and receive access to a community health worker (CHW) for one-on-one education about screening on study.
PHASE III and IV: Participating clinics and surrounding communities are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM V (EARLY INTERVENTION WAVE): Participating clinics and communities participate in the MLI early (years 2-3) for up to 30 months.
ARM VI (DELAYED INTERVENTION WAVE): Participating clinics and communities participate in the MLI 12 months later (years 3-4) for at least 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase I, Planning Phase (MLI material, focus group, interview) | Other | Providers and community members review MLI materials and participate in focus groups and interviews to discuss challenges to being screened, what community members know about cancer and screening and what should be included in a program to increase screening over 30-60 minutes on study. A clinic champion will be identified during the interview to lead, advise, and oversee the implementation of the MLI at their clinic location. |
|
| Phase II, Arm I (Health Clinics) | Active Comparator | The clinic champion coordinates planning sessions, staff training, and overall implementation and planning for the MLI within each health clinic. Health clinics may integrate new activities into usual clinic processes such as the use of the EHR to identify age-eligible patients in need of breast, cervical and/or CRC screening, reminder systems built into the EHR that can be sent to both providers and patients for screening and follow-up, and EHR information alerts for providers about patients who have positive FITs or a positive Pap test or mammogram on study. Additionally, health clinics may incorporate risk assessments (via paper or within the EHR) for all patients eligible for breast, cervical and/or CRC screening, promote screening via web-based or health portal messaging, promote annual wellness visits (during which screening should be discussed), and offer incentives for completing needed cancer screening on study. |
|
| Phase II, Arm II (Health Care Providers) | Active Comparator | Providers participate in educational sessions that include self-administered pre-test surveys and discussions that assess screening knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and practices, over one hour on study. Providers may also undergo coaching calls and one-on-one discussions to help tailor information and its delivery to the needs of providers and practices and are taught how to use clinic-based scheduling and reminder systems to help facilitate screening and follow-up actions. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer Screening | Other | Undergo cancer screening |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Up to date (UTD) status for all three screenings (Early Intervention Wave) | Will be assessed by the difference in proportions of being UTD with all age-appropriate screening tests using electronic health record (EHR) data. Rates will be examined by age, race/ethnicity, residence, payer status, provider, time since last visit, and rates of other cancer screening. Repeated measure Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) models with compound symmetry correlation structure and robust variance will be used to compare change between the early and delayed intervention groups adjusting for baseline UTD screening rates of the targeted communities. Adjustment for baseline UTD screening rates and rates of follow up for abnormal test will control for any differences by intervention group due to chance and will increase power by decreasing the standard error of the treatment effect. To account for differences in number of respondents across targeted communities, GEE models will be weighted using an approach described by Johnson et al. | At baseline and at the end of the Implementation Phase (up to 4 years) |
| Status of follow-up for abnormal tests (Early Intervention Wave) | Will be assessed by the difference in follow-up rates for abnormal tests using EHR data. GEE models with compound symmetry correlation structure and robust variance will be used to compare change between the early and delayed intervention groups adjusting for baseline UTD screening rates of the targeted communities. Adjustment for baseline UTD screening rates and rates of follow up for abnormal test will control for any differences by intervention group due to chance and will increase power by decreasing the standard error of the treatment effect. To account for differences in number of respondents across targeted communities, GEE models will be weighted using an approach described by Johnson et al. | At baseline and at the end of the Implementation Phase (up to 4 years) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| UTD screening status for all three cancers and follow up rates for abnormal tests | Will be assessed among age-appropriate residents of targeted census tracts. The individual-level UTD status pre- and post-intervention will be obtained from cross-sectional surveys, and it will be defined based on the age-specific United States Preventive Services Task Force Cancer Screening Guidelines screening recommendations for each cancer. A two-level hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model will be used to compare the UTD odds between the early and delayed intervention groups. In this two-level design, participants are the level one unit while the clinic areas are the level two unit of analysis, with all subjects in each cluster receiving either the early or delayed intervention. This design will allow to examine the effectiveness of the multi-level intervention at the individual- and cluster levels. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center | Contact | 800-293-5066 | OSUCCCClinicaltrials@osumc.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Electra D Paskett, PhD | Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center | Recruiting | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| The Jamesline | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Phase II, Arm III (Patients) | Active Comparator | Patients receive educational materials about screening and screening recommendations via mail and during in-person visits, and a web link for the developed small media website on study. Patients participate in discussions about screening and are offered any test for which they are not up to date and appropriate follow-up is conducted by designated staff on study. Patients who choose to undergo testing and receive a positive result receive a letter from the clinic and a call from the designated clinic staff member on study. |
|
| Phase II, Arm IV (Community) | Active Comparator | Community receive educational materials (e.g., posters) and outreach activities to promote screening (e.g., health fairs, farmers' markets, inflatable colon tours, community seminars) and receive access to a CHW for one-on-one education about screening on study. |
|
| Phase III and IV, Arm V (MLI Early Wave) | Experimental | Participating clinics and communities participate in the MLI early (years 2-3) for up to 30 months. |
|
| Phase III and IV, Arm VI (MLI Delayed Wave) | Experimental | Participating clinics and communities participate in the MLI 12 months later (years 3-4) for at least 12 months. |
|
| Discussion | Other | Participate in discussions |
|
|
| Educational Activity | Other | Receive coaching calls |
|
| Educational Intervention | Other | Receive educational materials |
|
|
| Focus Group | Behavioral | Participate in focus group |
|
| Health Care Delivery | Other | Integrate new activities into usual clinic processes |
|
|
| Health Promotion | Other | Promote screening and wellness visits |
|
|
| Health Promotion and Education | Other | Participate in educational sessions |
|
| Health Promotion and Education | Other | Participate in early wave MLI |
|
| Health Promotion and Education | Other | Participate in late wave MLI |
|
| Health Risk Assessment | Behavioral | Incorporate risk assessments |
|
|
| Implementation | Procedure | Implement MLI |
|
| Informational Intervention | Other | Review MLI materials |
|
| Internet-Based Intervention | Other | Receive educational online materials |
|
| Interview | Other | Participate in interview |
|
| Outreach | Behavioral | Receive outreach activities |
|
|
| Patient Navigation | Behavioral | Receive access to CHW |
|
|
| Survey Administration | Other | Ancillary studies |
|
| At the end of early intervention (up to 2.5 years) |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| D002583 | Uterine Cervical Neoplasms |
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D014594 | Uterine Neoplasms |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D002577 | Uterine Cervical Diseases |
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008403 | Mass Screening |
| D018479 | Early Intervention, Educational |
| D004522 | Educational Status |
| D008722 | Methods |
| D017144 | Focus Groups |
| D003695 | Delivery of Health Care |
| D006293 | Health Promotion |
| D018570 | Risk Assessment |
| D007407 | Interviews as Topic |
| D003159 | Community-Institutional Relations |
| D062526 | Patient Navigation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D006306 | Health Surveys |
| D011795 | Surveys and Questionnaires |
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D003954 | Diagnostic Services |
| D011314 | Preventive Health Services |
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |
| D015980 | Public Health Practice |
| D002662 | Child Health Services |
| D003153 | Community Health Services |
| D012959 | Socioeconomic Factors |
| D011154 | Population Characteristics |
| D010346 | Patient Care Management |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
| D006266 | Health Education |
| D012306 | Risk |
| D011336 | Probability |
| D013223 | Statistics as Topic |
| D012308 | Risk Management |
| D009934 | Organization and Administration |
| D015991 | Epidemiologic Measurements |
| D011641 | Public Relations |
| D018802 | Patient-Centered Care |
| D011320 | Primary Health Care |
| D003191 | Comprehensive Health Care |
Not provided
Not provided