Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Acquired brain damage generates motor, cognitive, behavioral and emotional deficits. Neurorehabilitation aims to reduce these deficits and develop compensatory strategies that increase the person's functionality. However, the success of neurorehabilitation process varies and is influenced by the type of injury, the characteristics of the patient or the treatment received. Despite all the studies about patient characteristics, psychological aspects currently continue to be a field to be explored.
The main objective of the study is to study the psychological characteristics of people with brain damage. Secondary objectives include analyzing its link with other indicators, exploring possible differences depending on the etiology of brain damage, assessing its evolution during neurorehabilitation and exploring its prognostic value.
To carry out this prospective longitudinal observational study, adult patients with acquired brain damage to less than 6 months of evolution who present an objective cognitive alteration will be selected. Patients with a neurological or psychiatric history will be excluded.
Patients included in the study will be administered computerized questionnaires at the beginning of the neurorehabilitation program. The same questionnaires will be administered again 2 months later. In those hospitalized patients who subsequently continue outpatient treatment, a third administration will be performed (2 months after the second administration).
The neurorehabilitative process can be influenced by different factors. Among the most studied are those related to the characteristics of the patient (age, level of education...), the injury (nature, location, magnitude...) or the treatment received (early, intensive...). In contrast, the possible influence of the patient's psychological characteristics on the neurorehabilitation process has been little studied.
Published research on the role of psychological characteristics in the neurorehabilitation process has focused on populations with mild brain damage, using cross-sectional methodologies. The researchers that use longitudinal methodologies study its influence in the chronic phase or once the intensive neurorehabilitation process is completed. There is, therefore, a field to explore in relation to the psychological characteristics of adult patients with moderate-severe acquired brain damage. Furthermore, longitudinal methodology has not been previously used to analyze possible changes in psychological variables during the neurorehabilitation process, nor the influence it may have on its prognosis.
Research Hypothesis:
Psychological characteristics, such as emotional well-being, self-esteem, and motivation, influence neurorehabilitation outcomes in patients with moderate-severe acquired brain damage.
It is expected that:
Objectives:
To verify the research hypothesis, the following objectives are set:
Main Objective To study the psychological characteristics of individuals with acquired brain damage.
Secondary Objectives:
Methodology: Prospective observational longitudinal study.
Sample:
After analyzing recent studies that address the same topic, it has been estimated that a sample of approximately 200 participants will be sufficient to meet the proposed objectives.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria are described in the proper section.
Method
Procedure:
At the beginning of the neurorehabilitation program, computerized questionnaires will be administered that assess 14 psychological characteristics (time T1). The same questionnaires will be administered again 2 months later (time T2). In those hospitalized patients who subsequently continue outpatient treatment, a third administration will be carried out 2 months later (time T3).
The 14 selected psychological characteristics will be assessed from 14 standardized questionnaires. The estimated time to complete all the questionnaires is approximately 45 minutes. They will be administered using REDCap (www.project-redcap.org). REDCap is a web application that allows the creation and administration of questionnaires and databases online. Participants will be offered the possibility of completing the questionnaires in person or online. In the second case, the link will be sent to them by email.
The list and characteristics of the main outcome variables are described in its proper section.
Other types of data will also be collected:
Orientation: Subtest of orientation in person, space and time of the Barcelona Test (T. B).
Language: Subtest of word repetition, visual-verbal naming and comprehension of orders (T. B).
Gnosis (Visoperception): Subtest of superimposed images (T. B).
Attention:
Attentional span: Digit span (WAIS-III). Selective: TMT-A Divided: TMT-B Sustained: Continuous Performance Test (CPT-3). Verbal memory: Short-term, Long-term, and Recognition (RAVLT).
Executive Functions:
Working memory: Reverse digit span, Letter-Number Sequencing (WAIS-III) Flexibility: PMR, WCST (Perseverative errors). Categorization: WCST (Categories) Visual construction: Block Design (WAIS-III). Processing speed: Digit Symbol(WAIS-III)
Processing of personal data:
All participants will be informed at the beginning of the study of its characteristics, its objectives and the implications of their participation, in order to obtain their consent to participate. For this reason, they will be provided with an information document describing the type of study, the potential advantages and disadvantages, the duration of the project and the procedures that will be applied. In addition, the document will explain very precisely all the measures related to data protection, and the right of participants to decline their participation in the study without consequences, explicitly guaranteeing that there will be no difference in the way in which they may be treated in the future at the center, regardless of their decision to participate in the study; as well as the right to abandon it at any time they consider appropriate, without needing to offer any explanation justifying their decision.
In order to preserve the confidentiality of the subjects who are part of the study, techniques will be used to dissociate personal data from the data that is part of the research object. The researchers will use anonymized data at all times, which they will receive through a query to the IT department from the research and innovation office, who will supervise the effective elimination of any personal data. The procedure will comply at all times with the regulations established in Organic Law 03/2018 of 5 December and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on Data Protection (GDPR).
Ethical considerations:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with Acquired Brain Injury | Any patient who begins neurorehabilitation treatment at the Institut Guttmann Neurorehabilitation Hospital (Badalona) during the recruitment period will be considered a candidate for the study. The inclusion and exclusion criteria will then be checked, and those who meet the criteria will be offered participation in the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurorehabilitation program | Other | Participants will participate in a neurorehabilitation program, consisting in a structured, interdisciplinary approach designed to help individuals improve their functional abilities following acquired brain injury. The goal is to optimize the individual's physical, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning to enhance their quality of life The neurorehabilitation program includes, physical rehabilitation, occupational therapy, speech therapy and neuropsychological rehabilitation (cognitive, emotional and behavioral). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Illness perception | The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) 9 items. 1-10 score range for each item. Higher scores describe a higher degree of accord with the correspondent parameter of perception. | 4 months |
| Motivation towards rehabilitation | Motivation in stroke patients for rehabilitation scale (MORE) 17 items. 17-119 score range. Higher scores describe a higher degree of motivation towards rehabilitation. | 4 months |
| Personal values | Valued Living Questionnaire - Adapted (22 items) Part A: 11 items. 1-10 score range for each item. Higher scores describe a higher degree of identification towards the specific value. Part B: 11 items. 1-4 score range for each item. Higher scores describe a worse perceived impact in the specific value described after the brain injury. | 4 months |
| Coping strategies | Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory - Abbreviated (Brief COPE) 28 items. 28-112 score range. Higher scores describe a higher use of coping strategies. | 4 months |
| Depressive symptomatology | Depressive symptomatology measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) 9 items. 0-27 score range. Higher scores describe higher depressive symptomatology | 4 months |
| Anxiety symptomatology | Anxiety symptomatology measured by General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) 7 items. 0-21 score range. Higher scores describe higher anxiety symptomatology | 4 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age over 18 years
Present acquired brain damage (stroke, head trauma, encephalopathy, brain tumor, or anoxia) after less than 6 months of evolution.
Participants must present a cognitive alteration objectified through a neuropsychological examination.
Be correctly oriented in person, space and time (assessed by psychometric tests).
Have a good command of Spanish.
Exclusion Criteria:
Presenting a neurological or psychiatric history.
Presenting a language disorder or severe visual-perceptive disorder - hemineglect - that prevents participation in the study (does not allow for correct administration of the questionnaire).
A posteriori criterion (once the study has begun): Answering incorrectly to any of the validity items included in the questionnaire. This situation leads to automatic exclusion from studies.
The initial neuropsychological examination will be used to check whether participants meet inclusion criteria 3 and 4, as well as exclusion criterion 7. This examination includes orientation tests (subtest of the Barcelona Orientation Test), language tests (subtests of the Barcelona Word Repetition Test, Word Naming and Command Comprehension Test) and visual-perception tests (subtests of the Barcelona Superimposed Figures Test). Only those participants who correctly answer all the items will be selected.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Any patient who begins neurorehabilitation treatment at the Institut Guttmann Neurorehabilitation Hospital (Badalona) during the recruitment period will be considered a candidate for the study. The inclusion and exclusion criteria will then be checked, and those who meet the criteria will be offered participation in the study.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miguel Espiña, Psychology | Contact | +34 934 977 700 | 2194 | mespina@guttmann.com |
| Alberto Garcia, Psychology | Contact | +34 934 977 700 | 2141 | agarciam@guttmann.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institut Guttmann | Badalona | Barcelona | 08916 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25658182 | Background | Chung ML, Bakas T, Plue LD, Williams LS. Effects of Self-esteem, Optimism, and Perceived Control on Depressive Symptoms in Stroke Survivor-Spouse Dyads. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):E8-E16. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000232. | |
| 37521301 | Background | Yoshida T, Otaka Y, Kitamura S, Ushizawa K, Kumagai M, Yaeda J, Osu R. Influence of motivation on rehabilitation outcomes after subacute stroke in convalescent rehabilitation wards. Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 14;14:1185813. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1185813. eCollection 2023. |
Not provided
Not provided
Sharing individual participant data will be considered upon approval by the hospital executive board and ethical committee.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001930 | Brain Injuries |
| D000070642 | Brain Injuries, Traumatic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D006259 | Craniocerebral Trauma |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000066530 | Neurological Rehabilitation |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Anosognosia | Ad-hoc Anosognosia Questionnaire. 5 Items. 1-20 score range. Higher scores describe a higher perceived cognitive impairment. | 4 months |
| Self-Esteem | Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale (RSE) 10 items. 0-30 score range. Higher scores describe a higher degree of Self-Esteem. | 4 months |
| Locus of control | Sense of Control Scale. 8 items. 4 subscales with a range of -4 to +4. Locus of control refers to the perception of where control lies within their life and the causes of the events. A higher "internal good" subscale describes a higher tendency to attribute success towards oneself. A higher "external good" subscale describes a higher tendency to attribute success towards elements independent of oneself. A higher "internal bad" subscale describes a higher tendency to attribute failure towards oneself. A higher "external bad" subscale describes a higher tendency to attribute failure towards elements independent of oneself. | 4 months |
| Self-Compassion | Self-Compassion Scale Short Form (SCS-SF) 12 items. 12-60 score range. Higher scores describe a higher degree of Self-Compassion. | 4 months |
| Injustice Experience | Injustice Experience Questionnaire; IEQ 12 items. 0-48 score range. Higher scores describe a higher perception of injustice. | 4 months |
| Dispositional hope | Life Orientation Test (LOT-R): 6 items. 0-24 score range. Higher scores describe a higher degree of dispositional hope. | 4 months |
| Posttraumatic Growth | Posttraumatic Growth Inventory Short Form (PTGI-SF) 8 items. 0-40 score range. Higher scores describe a higher degree of Posttraumatic Growth. | 4 months |
| Personality traits | Big Five Inventory -2 (BFI-2-S) 30 items. 15 subscales with a 2-10 score range. 5 Personality traits with varying ranges of scores. Higher scores describe a higher intensity in that specific personality trait. | 4 months |
| 35298513 | Background | Yoshida T, Otaka Y, Kitamura S, Ushizawa K, Kumagai M, Kurihara Y, Yaeda J, Osu R. Development and validation of new evaluation scale for measuring stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation in rehabilitation wards. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0265214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265214. eCollection 2022. |
| 8827649 | Background | Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996 Jul;9(3):455-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02103658. |
| 18536983 | Background | Sullivan MJ, Adams H, Horan S, Maher D, Boland D, Gross R. The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil. 2008 Sep;18(3):249-61. doi: 10.1007/s10926-008-9140-5. Epub 2008 Jun 7. |
| 16717171 | Background | Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. |
| 27055049 | Background | Soto CJ, John OP. The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7. |
| 7815302 | Background | Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Dec;67(6):1063-78. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063. |
| 17992972 | Background | Martin-Albo J, Nuniez JL, Navarro JG, Grijalvo F. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: translation and validation in university students. Span J Psychol. 2007 Nov;10(2):458-67. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600006727. |
| 22789409 | Background | Rodero B, Luciano JV, Montero-Marin J, Casanueva B, Palacin JC, Gili M, Lopez del Hoyo Y, Serrano-Blanco A, Garcia-Campayo J. Perceived injustice in fibromyalgia: psychometric characteristics of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire and relationship with pain catastrophising and pain acceptance. J Psychosom Res. 2012 Aug;73(2):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 20. |
| 21584907 | Background | Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702. Epub 2010 Jun 8. |
| 21955598 | Background | Pacheco-Huergo V, Viladrich C, Pujol-Ribera E, Cabezas-Pena C, Nunez M, Roura-Olmeda P, Amado-Guirado E, Nunez E, Del Val JL; en representacion del Grupo IPQ-R. [Perception in chronic illnesses: linguistic validation of the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire for a Spanish population]. Aten Primaria. 2012 May;44(5):280-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2010.11.022. Epub 2011 Sep 28. Spanish. |
| 32951302 | Background | Nakamori M, Imamura E, Tachiyama K, Kamimura T, Hayashi Y, Matsushima H, Okamoto H, Mizoue T, Wakabayashi S. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 predicts the functional outcome of stroke patients in convalescent rehabilitation ward. Brain Behav. 2020 Dec;10(12):e01856. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1856. Epub 2020 Sep 20. |
| 37708399 | Background | Miller LR, Divers R, Reed C, Cherry J, Patrick A, Calamia M. Value-consistent rehabilitation is associated with long-term psychological flexibility and quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2024 Aug;34(7):955-973. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2023.2256964. Epub 2023 Sep 14. |
| 32675425 | Background | McIntyre A, Mehta S, Janzen S, Rice D, Harnett A, MacKenzie HM, Vanderlaan D, Teasell R. Coping strategies and personality traits among individuals with brain injury and depressive symptoms. NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;47(1):25-34. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203081. |
| 36340193 | Background | Martinez-Vazquez S, Martinez-Galiano JM, Peinado-Molina RA, Gutierrez-Sanchez B, Hernandez-Martinez A. Validation of General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire in Spanish nursing students. PeerJ. 2022 Nov 1;10:e14296. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14296. eCollection 2022. |
| 27515801 | Background | Leventhal H, Phillips LA, Burns E. The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):935-946. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2. Epub 2016 Aug 11. |
| 11556941 | Background | Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. |
| 30654994 | Background | Groeneveld IF, van der Pas SL, Meesters JJL, Schuurman JM, van Meijeren-Pont W, Jagersma E, Goossens PH, Kaptein AA, Vliet Vlieland TPM; SCORE-study group. Illness perceptions of stroke survivors: Predictors and changes over time - A 1 year follow-up study. J Psychosom Res. 2019 Jan;116:54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.10.019. Epub 2018 Nov 2. |
| 35035195 | Background | Garrido-Hernansaiz H, Rodriguez-Rey R, Collazo-Castineira P, Collado S. The posttraumatic growth inventory-short form (PTGI-SF): A psychometric study of the spanish population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 11:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02645-z. Online ahead of print. |
| 24410742 | Background | Garcia-Campayo J, Navarro-Gil M, Andres E, Montero-Marin J, Lopez-Artal L, Demarzo MM. Validation of the Spanish versions of the long (26 items) and short (12 items) forms of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jan 10;12:4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-4. |
| 11485122 | Background | Diez-Quevedo C, Rangil T, Sanchez-Planell L, Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. Validation and utility of the patient health questionnaire in diagnosing mental disorders in 1003 general hospital Spanish inpatients. Psychosom Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;63(4):679-86. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200107000-00021. |
| 16250744 | Background | Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6. |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D006296 |
| Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |