Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210151 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Kamprad Family Foundation for Entrepreneurship, Research and Charity | |
| 941250 and 981144 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Linkoeping University | OTHER_GOV |
| Jonkoping County Hospital | OTHER |
| Jonkoping University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Abuse of older people is common and people with dementia are especially susceptible to abuse. Older people may be subjected to physical, psychological, sexual, financial abuse or neglect by relatives as well as health and social care professionals or other people in a relationship involving an expectation of trust. Reporting experiences of abuse is associated with poor health outcomes. Still, abusive experiences are often unknown to professionals.
This study protocol describes the development and procedure to test the validity of two new screening instruments (REAGERA-S20 and REAGERA-N) to detect abuse of people with dementia. The aims of the study are:
Method People with mild to moderate dementia (n=80) and their next of kin (n=80) are recruited at health and social care facilities providing care to people with dementia. In cases of severe dementia or when the person with dementia is excluded for other reasons, only next of kin is included.
The following steps are used in the data collection
The validity of the REAGERA-S20/REAGERA-N will be calculated using the following classification of participants made in the interviews as gold standard (aim 1):
For the person with dementia
For the next of kin
After completion of data collection, the REAMI is filled out by a health or social care professional with knowledge about the participant with dementia. Validity of the instrument will be calculated using the information provided in the interview as the gold standard (aim 2).
All interviews are recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analyses of the qualitative interviews will be made to explore experiences of abuse among participants (aim 3).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| People with dementia | People diagnosed with dementia | ||
| Next of kin | Next of kin to people with dementia |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Validity of REAGERA-S20 and REAGERA-N | Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio as well as positive and negative predictive value of REAGERA-S20 and REAGERA-N will be calculated. The final classification made after interviewing both the person with dementia and the next of kin will be used as the gold standard. | Participant fill out questionnaire (REAGERA-S20/REAGERA-N) at enrollment Semi-structured interview used as gold standard is conducted immediately afterwards. |
| Predictive value of the introductory screening questions in part one | Test the predictive value of the introductory screening questions in part one of each instrument to identify abusive experiences as identified in part two of the instruments as well as in the final classification made after both individual and joint interview. | Participant fill out questionnaire (REAGERA-S20/REAGERA-N) at enrollment. Semi-structured interview used as gold standard is conducted immediately afterwards. |
| Validity of the REAMI | Health and social care professionals fill out the REAMI questionnaire assessing risk of abuse. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio as well as positive and negative predictive value will be calculated for REAMI concerning its ability to detect abusive experiences. The interview conducted with participants will be used as the gold standard for calculations. | Semi-structured interview used as gold standard is conducted at enrollment. Health and social care professionals fill out the REAMI at some point between patient enrollment and end of study, but usually within a few weeks of enrollment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Validity of REAGERA-S20 and REAGERA-N using individual interview as gold standard | Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio as well as positive and negative predictive value for REAGERA-S20/REAGERA-N using only information given in the individual interview with the person with dementia or the next of kind respectively as the gold standard. | Participant fill out questionnaire (REAGERA-S20/REAGERA-N) at enrollment. Semi-structured interview used as gold standard is conducted immediately afterwards. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
- Patient and next of kin that come in contact with memory clinics or in muncipality care provided to people with dementia in the participating study locations.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region Jönköpings Län | Jönköping | 55111 | Sweden | |||
| Region Östergötland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40855257 | Derived | Simmons J, Floberg E, Casselgren C, Westerlind B, Sandberg J, Swahnberg K, Nagga K, Ludvigsson M, Johansson L. REAGERA-dementia: study protocol for the validation of screening instruments to detect abuse of people with dementia. BMC Geriatr. 2025 Aug 25;25(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06291-z. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Webpage of research program | View source |
Not provided
Anonymous quantitative data will be made available from the researcher upon reasonable request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003704 | Dementia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Expected associations with established outcomes (FAQ) | Associations between reporting abuse in REAGERA-S20/REAGERA-N and high score on the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) will be calculated. The FAQ consists of ten items and each item can be scored from 0 (no dependence) to 3 (totally dependent). A sum score (0-30) will be calculated and a higher score indicates a greater dependence on others for activities in daily living. | Participant fill out questionnaire (REAGERA-S20/REAGERA-N) as well as the FAQ at enrollment. |
| Expected associations with established outcomes (ZBI) | Associations between reporting abuse in REAGERA-S20/REAGERA-N and high score on the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). The 12 items ZBI is used and each item is answered on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). A sum score will be created for all items (range 0-48) and a higher sum score indicate a greater care giver burden. | Participant fill out questionnaire (REAGERA-S20/REAGERA-N) as well as the ZBI at enrollment |
| Linköping |
| 58191 |
| Sweden |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |