Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| A*Star | OTHER |
| Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to conduct a safe SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant human infection challenge in adult healthy volunteers. The main objectives are to:
Participants will be given the GMP-produced Delta SARS-CoV-2 virus via intranasal drops using the optimized conditions established in the "Development of a SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant human infection challenge model" (COVHIC002) Human Challenge Study being conducted in the UK. A safe and well-tolerated human challenge model with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant will be established in Singapore. This model will be used to accelerate next-generation vaccine development and to determine the factors associated with altered clinical and virological outcomes; correlates of protection; and targets for the development of novel vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics.
Human challenge studies involve the deliberate infection of volunteers to allow detailed investigation of host-pathogen interactions and the effect of interventions. The strength of these studies lies in their highly controlled nature. Carefully selected participant groups are inoculated with standardised amounts of a well-characterised virus. This enables exact longitudinal measurement of viral kinetics, immunological responses, transmission dynamics and the duration of infectious shedding. By giving all study participants the same virus at the same dose and under the same conditions, confounding by virus strain, dose, and exposure is controlled. Host factors associated with inter-individual differences in clinical outcome as well as the effect of interventions can then be robustly inferred.
The Human Challenge study contrasts with even the most well-controlled field trials, including household contact studies. In natural infection, the virus quasi-species (i.e., mixture of slightly differing virus particles), dose, timing and conditions of exposure cannot be known, and contacts are only identified following diagnosis of the index case. At this time, secondary exposure has almost always already occurred, thus missing transmission events as well as the early phase of infection. Human challenge is therefore the only study design where the earliest pre-symptomatic changes post infection may be studied. These early time-points are critical to understanding how some people who are exposed to a virus resist infection and to delineate early infectiousness and transmissibility.
The first SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study (COVHIC001) was conducted in 2021 and showed no serious safety concerns after inoculating 36 healthy, unvaccinated, young adults with a pre-Alpha "Wuhan" strain of SARS-CoV-2. A follow up human challenge study with a Delta variant (COVHIC002) is currently ongoing in the UK. COVHIC002 will determine and optimise the conditions for a safe human challenge model with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. These conditions will subsequently be applied in this companion study, Sing-CoV.
Importantly, a model of vaccine breakthrough infection will have a substantially improved safety profile compared with the first (seronegative) study as:
Recent SARS-CoV-2 variants-of-concern (VOC; Delta and Omicron) have shown high rates of vaccine breakthrough infection, indicating that human challenge with these strains may be optimised as a platform for the rapid testing of vaccines and therapeutics in small numbers of participants despite pre-existing immunity, especially between waves of the pandemic, when occurrence of natural disease is relatively uncommon. This will enable efficient early-stage testing of the many vaccine and antiviral candidates in development so that the most promising can go forward quickly enough to large-scale field efficacy trials to meaningfully tackle the ongoing pandemic.
Thus, in the short term, a Delta human challenge model will uniquely enable:
Establishing the capability to perform SARS-CoV-2 human challenge studies in Singapore will be highly significant. Firstly, this will facilitate development of therapeutics and vaccines in the region; secondly, it will ensure inferences drawn from SARS-CoV-2 human challenge studies are applicable to people of Asian ethnicity; and thirdly, it will support capacity development in the region where future coronavirus pandemics (like SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2) are expected to originate.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SARS-CoV-2 Delta human infection challenge | Experimental | GMP-produced Delta SARS-CoV-2 virus will be given to participants via intranasal drops. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMP-produced SARS-CoV-2 Delta strain | Other | The challenge virus used in Sing-CoV study is the same as that used in COVHIC002 study. It was originally obtained in mid 2021 from a nose-throat swab from an otherwise healthy young adult with mild COVID-19 in the community. The procedure for isolation, storage, preparation, and administration of challenge virus in this study (Sing-CoV and COVHIC002) is the same as used in the first SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study (COVHIC001) at Imperial College London and the same as used in the COV-CHIM01 (NCT04864548) SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study at University of Oxford. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To identify a safe dose of SARS-CoV-2 in healthy volunteers in Singapore, suitable for future intervention studies | To evaluate the safety of a SARS-CoV-2 challenge in healthy participants by assessing:
| From day of viral challenge (Day 0) to Day 28 follow-up visit |
| To identify an infectious dose of SARS-CoV-2 in healthy volunteers in Singapore, suitable for future intervention studies | To determine the attack rate of the Delta variant SARS-CoV-2 inoculum dose of TID 1x106 in sero-selected participants. Laboratory confirmed infection is defined as: • Two quantifiable greater than lower limit of quantification (≥LLOQ) RT-PCR measurements from mid turbinate and/or throat samples, reported on 2 or more consecutive timepoints, starting from Day 2 post-inoculation and up to discharge from quarantine. | From day 2 post-inoculation to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To further assess SARS-CoV-2 viral infection rates in upper respiratory samples in healthy volunteers | To assess the incidence of laboratory confirmed infection rates using a) mid turbinate samples, b) throat swabs, and c) both mid turbinate and throat swabs. | From day of viral challenge (Day 0) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To explore the changes in smell (anosmia/parosmia) through infection. | The University of Pennslvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) will be used. It is provided as booklets containing a series of cards that the participants scratch and smell then asked to identify the odours. The test provides an index of absolute dysfunction (ie, anosmia, severe microsmia, moderate microsmia, mild microsmia, normosmia, factitious), as well as relative dysfunction based upon age and gender-adjusted normative percentile ranks. The total number of odorant stimuli out of 40 that is correctly identified serves as the test measure. Scores on this test correlate well with other types of olfactory tests, including threshold tests. The UPSIT is designed to be self-administered after explanation of the test by study staff and will be performed once before virus inoculation and then approximately every third day starting from Day 1, though the test can be conducted more frequently at the discretion of the Investigator. |
Inclusion Criteria:
5b) Male participants who are willing to use one of the contraception methods described in the study protocol, from the time of the date of viral challenge, for 6 months.
6) In good health with no history of clinically significant medical conditions (as described in Exclusion criteria) that would interfere with subject safety, as defined by medical history, physical examination and routine laboratory tests, ECG, and Chest X-Ray and determined by the Investigator at an admission evaluation.
7) Willing and able to commit to participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
History or evidence of any clinically significant or currently active cardiovascular, (including thromboembolic events), respiratory, dermatological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, haematological, hepatic, immunological, rheumatological, metabolic, urological, renal, neurological, psychiatric illness. Specifically:
Participants with any history of physician diagnosed and/or objective test confirmed asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, reactive airway disease, or chronic lung condition of any aetiology or who have experienced:
History of thromboembolic, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease
History or evidence of diabetes mellitus
Any concurrent serious illness including history of malignancy that could interfere with the aims of the study or a participant completing the study. Basal cell carcinoma within 5 years of treatment or with evidence of recurrence is also an exclusion
Migraine with associated neurological symptoms such as hemiplegia or vision loss. Cluster headache/migraine or prophylactic treatment for migraine
History or evidence of autoimmune disease or known immunodeficiency of any cause.
Other major disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with a participant completing the study and necessary investigations.
Any significant abnormality altering the anatomy or function of the nose or nasopharynx in a substantial way (including loss of or alterations in smell or taste), a clinically significant history of epistaxis (large nosebleeds) within the last 3 months, nasal or sinus surgery within 6 months of inoculation.
Clinically active rhinitis (including hay fever) or history of moderate to severe rhinitis, or history of seasonal allergic rhinitis likely to be active at the time of inclusion into the study and/or requiring regular nasal corticosteroids on an at least weekly basis, within 30 days of admission to quarantine.
History of anaphylaxis and/or a history of severe allergic reaction or significant intolerance to any food or drug, as assessed by the PI.
Significant history or presence of drug or alcohol misuse
Current use of any drugs taken through the nasal or inhaled route
Psychiatric illness including participants with a history of depression and/or anxiety with associated severe psychiatric comorbidities, for example psychosis.
Consider exclusion in the following cases: (a) Participants with history of anxiety-related symptoms of any severity within the last 2 years if the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score is ≥4; (b)Participants with a history of depression of any severity within the last 2 years if the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score is ≥4. (c) severe claustrophobia
Current active smokers: equivalent to >5 cigarettes per week, including use of tobacco in any form (e.g., smoking or chewing) or other nicotine-containing products in any form (e.g., gum, patch) or electronic cigarettes.
Ex-smokers: Participants who have smoked >5 pack years at any time [5 pack years is equivalent to one pack of 20 cigarettes a day for 5 years]. Ex-smokers that have smoked <5 pack years at any time must not have smoked in the last 3 months.
Family history of 1st degree relative aged 50 years or less with sudden cardiac or unexplained death
Personal or Family History of unexpectedly severe COVID-19 (including a personal history of COVID-19 pneumonia), severe adverse response to any other viral disease e.g., Guillain-Barré, or a family history (described as a 1st degree relative) with clotting disorders
A total body weight of ≤ 45kg and a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤18 kg/m2 and ≥28 kg/m2. The upper limit of BMI may be increased to 30kg/m2 at the PI's discretion, in the case of physically fit muscular individual
Venous access deemed inadequate for the phlebotomy demands of the study.
Any clinically significant abnormal finding on screening biochemistry, haematology and microbiology blood tests or urinalysis apart from minor deviations which are clinically acceptable and approved by the investigator.
Any of the following:
A forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and a forced vital capacity (FVC) <80% of predicted value calculated using ATS/ERS guidance
Twelve-lead ECG recording with clinically relevant abnormalities as judged by the study investigator.
History of, or currently active symptoms suggestive of upper or lower respiratory tract infection (including reduced sense of taste and smell, raised body temperature and/or persistent cough) within 4 weeks prior to viral challenge.
Presence of cold-like symptoms and/or fever (defined as participant presenting with a temperature reading of >37.9ºC) on Day -1 and/or pre-challenge on Day 0.
Evidence of any respiratory virus infection (on Respiratory PCR from upper respiratory tract sample) on admission to the quarantine unit, prior to challenge virus inoculation.
Receipt of a live vaccine within 60 days prior to the planned date of viral challenge, a non-live vaccine within 30 days prior to the planned date of viral challenge or intention to receive any vaccination(s) before the day 28 follow-up visit.
Receipt of blood or blood products, or loss (including blood donations) of 550 mL or more of blood during the 3 months prior to the planned date of viral challenge or planned during the 3 months after the final visit.
Medications:
Previous participation in a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trial of a currently unapproved/unlicensed vaccine in Singapore
Participant is mentally or legally incapacitated in the opinion of the Investigator.
Females who:
Anyone who is first degree related to anyone who is a delegated member of the research team.
Any other reason that the Investigator considered made the participant unsuitable to participate.
Participants with no knowledge of their family history.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Barnaby E Young, MB BChir, PhD | National Centre for Infectious Diseases | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Centre for Infectious Diseases | Singapore | Singapore | 308442 | Singapore |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37307844 | Background | Zhou J, Singanayagam A, Goonawardane N, Moshe M, Sweeney FP, Sukhova K, Killingley B, Kalinova M, Mann AJ, Catchpole AP, Barer MR, Ferguson NM, Chiu C, Barclay WS. Viral emissions into the air and environment after SARS-CoV-2 human challenge: a phase 1, open label, first-in-human study. Lancet Microbe. 2023 Aug;4(8):e579-e590. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00101-5. Epub 2023 Jun 9. | |
| 35361992 |
Not provided
Not provided
All study findings and documents will be regarded as confidential. The investigators and other study personnel must not disclose such information without prior written approval from the PI. Participant confidentiality will be strictly maintained to the extent possible under the law and local hospital policy. Identifiable information will be removed from any published data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086382 | COVID-19 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011024 | Pneumonia, Viral |
| D011014 | Pneumonia |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| To assess the incidence of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, in healthy volunteers | To assess the incidence of lab-confirmed symptomatic SARSCoV-2 infection using a) mid turbinate samples, b) throat swabs, and c) both mid turbinate and throat swabs. | From day of viral challenge (Day 0) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| To assess the SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics in upper respiratory samples in healthy volunteers | To assess viral dynamics using a) mid turbinate samples, and b) throat swabs, as measured by qPCR. | Day of inoculation (Day 0) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| To assess SARS-CoV-2 induced symptoms, in healthy volunteers | Sum total symptoms diary card score: sum total clinical symptoms (TSS) as measured by graded symptom scoring system, starting one day post-viral challenge (Day 1) up to discharge from quarantine. | Day of inoculation (Day 0) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| To assess the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 illness, in healthy volunteers | The incidence of:
| Day of inoculation (Day 0) to discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| Day of inoculation (Day 0) to Day 28 follow up |
| To explore the safety of a SARS-CoV-2 human challenge model in healthy adults | To explore safety related measures of SARS-CoV-2 challenge in healthy participants by assessing the occurrence of haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities during the quarantine period. | Day of inoculation (Day 0) to Day 28 follow up |
| To explore the SARS-CoV-2 viral infection rates in saliva in healthy volunteers | To measure the laboratory confirmed infection rates, as defined by:
| From Day 2 post-inoculation to discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| To explore the SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics in saliva in healthy volunteers | To assess viral dynamics in saliva by qPCR. | From Day 1 post-inoculation up to discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| To explore SARS-CoV-2 viral infection in stool of healthy volunteers | To measure SARS-CoV-2 excretion in the stool by: • Virus detection and quantification using qRT-PCR | From Day 1 post-inoculation up to discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| To explore the changes in humoral immunity after SARS-CoV-2 challenge | Assays performed on blood, stool and mucosal samples to assess humoral immunity / systems serology SARS-CoV-2 (for example: SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing titres, ELISAs to IgG, IgM, IgA, sIgA, ADCC) | Up to Day 360 post-inoculation |
| To explore the proteomic changes after SARS-CoV-2 challenge | Assays performed on blood, stool and mucosal samples to assess proteomic levels and changes (for example, cytokine and chemokines). | Up to Day 360 post-inoculation |
| To explore the changes in cellular immunity after SARS-CoV-2 challenge | Assays performed on blood, stool and mucosal samples include cellular cell quantification and quality of immunity (for example T and B cell frequencies, phenotypes, and functionality assays, ELISPOTs, ICS). | Up to Day 360 post-inoculation |
| To explore the transcriptomic changes after SARS-CoV-2 challenge | Assays performed on blood, stool and mucosal samples to measure transcriptome levels and changes (for example, RNAseq, single cell RNAseq, microarray, PCR) | Up to Day 360 post-inoculation |
| To explore environmental contamination in the SARS-CoV-2 human challenge model in healthy adults | Air samples, exhaled breath samples with the use of a face mask or G-II exhaled breath collector, and surface swab samples will be used for virus detection and quantification. | Day of admission (Day -1) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| To explore changes in the vasculature during SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthy adults | To measure changes in endothelial function during SARS-CoV-2 infection: • To assess levels of endothelial derived mediators (e.g., prostacyclin, endothelin-1, nitric oxide) in the plasma | Up to Day 360 post-inoculation |
| To explore the performance of antigen rapid tests (ART) during SARS-CoV-2 infection of healthy adults | To explore the performance of antigen rapid tests performed by participants themselves following manufacturer's instructions (no additional training) in comparison with SARS-CoV-2 PCR and culture | Day of admission (Day -1) to day of discharge from quarantine (Day 10 for uninfected participants or Day 14 for infected participants) |
| Background |
| Killingley B, Mann AJ, Kalinova M, Boyers A, Goonawardane N, Zhou J, Lindsell K, Hare SS, Brown J, Frise R, Smith E, Hopkins C, Noulin N, Londt B, Wilkinson T, Harden S, McShane H, Baillet M, Gilbert A, Jacobs M, Charman C, Mande P, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Semple MG, Read RC, Ferguson NM, Openshaw PJ, Rapeport G, Barclay WS, Catchpole AP, Chiu C. Safety, tolerability and viral kinetics during SARS-CoV-2 human challenge in young adults. Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):1031-1041. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01780-9. Epub 2022 Mar 31. |
| D014777 |
| Virus Diseases |
| D018352 | Coronavirus Infections |
| D003333 | Coronaviridae Infections |
| D030341 | Nidovirales Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |