Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| A539750 | Other Identifier | UW- Madison |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation | UNKNOWN |
| University of Oklahoma | OTHER |
| University of Pittsburgh | OTHER |
| University of South Florida |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of the FCS curriculum on achieving the learning objectives and resident reported self-efficacy with communication skills and determine the scalability of the training across a range of general surgery training programs
The researchers have developed a 5-year curriculum for surgical trainees called the Fundamentals of Communication in Surgery (FCS). The training includes core communication skills, e.g., expressing empathy, and frameworks to support informed consent and serious illness conversations, specifically Best Case/Worst Case and Better Conversations. The curriculum provides one developmentally appropriate two-hour session for each of the five years of surgical training. Because the training is skills based (e.g., scenario planning) and not procedure based (e.g., goals of care conversations) exercises are focused on specific techniques that build over subsequent sessions.
Researchers will invite 1-3 surgical attendings per site with an interest in surgical education to serve as trainers for the FCS curriculum.
All general surgery trainees at each institution will have access to the training program as part of their regularly scheduled educational curriculum, regardless of training year or status as a categorical resident. If there is interest, researchers will provide access to the curriculum to fellows and residents in affiliated programs, e.g., plastic surgery.
Researchers will invite site personnel who have roles related to surgical education including the program director and associate program director (if applicable), 2 to 3 attending surgeons who have high contact with residents in urgent care settings (e.g., emergency general surgery), 1 to 2 members of the education coordination team.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Learners | All general surgery trainees at each institution will have access to the training program as part of their regularly scheduled educational curriculum, regardless of training year or status as a categorical resident. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery of FCS Skills Curriculum | Behavioral | The UW study team will conduct two 2-hour train-the-trainer sessions with all surgical attendings who have committed to participation as a trainer in the FCS curriculum. The designated trainer will deliver each 2-hour session during the existing formal educational time for residents. If existing protected educational time will not allow for a 2-hour training session, the sessions can be delivered in two 1-hour sessions. These sessions will be incorporated into the curriculum similar to all other formal training provided to residents with the same expectations to attend. Each 2-hour FCS session starts with a 30-minute exercise in empathic communication. The remaining 90 minutes are devoted to skills that support decision making about surgery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Trainee Reaction to the Training | Surgical trainees will complete a 5-item survey on a scale of 1-5 (1= strongly disagree, 5= strongly agree). Total scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the curriculum. | Day of training through 2 months post-training |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Trainee Self-Efficacy - Ability | Surgical trainees will complete an 8-item ability survey on a scale of 1-5 (1= not at all able to do, 5= easily able to do). Total scores range from 8-40, with higher scores indicating a better ability to communicate. | Before training, directly after training, and 2 months post-training |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be from each participating site.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Margaret (Gretchen) L Schwarze, MD, MPP | University of Wisconsin, Madison | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Wisconsin-Madison | Madison | Wisconsin | 53706 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003142 | Communication |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| West Virginia University | OTHER |
| Duke University | OTHER |
| Association for Academic Surgery | UNKNOWN |
| Inova Fairfax Medical Campus | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Receipt of Curriculum |
Educational coordinators will provide a direct count of the number of categorical residents who attend their session, divided by the total number eligible to attend. |
| 1 day of training |
| Performance of Skills | Trainers will observe surgical trainees to evaluate them on various items using a scoring rubric. Each item will be scored as not done, done, or exceptional. Binary Scoring (0/1) 0: Not Done 1: Done Ternary Scoring (0/1/2) 0: Not Done
| Baseline (before training), directly after training, and 2 months post-training |
| Fidelity to the Intervention | A member of the UW study team will travel to each institution once to observe one 2-hour educational session in person. The observer will use an implementation checklist (rubric) to record performance of discrete elements of the curriculum and the fidelity to the overall training program goals as described in the learning objectives. | 1 day of training |
| Trainee Self-Efficacy - Preparedness | Surgical trainees will also complete a 6-item preparedness survey with a scale of 1-5 (1= not at all prepared, 5= very well prepared). Total scores range from 6-35, with higher scores indicating greater confidence in navigating treatment decisions. | Before training, directly after training, and 2 months post-training |