Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| NYU Langone Health | OTHER |
| Temple Health | UNKNOWN |
| Allegheny Health Network | OTHER |
| University of Wisconsin, Madison |
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to confirm the safety and efficacy of ThinkSono Guidance, a software data collection and communication tool designed to collect ultrasound data to help detect blood clots in veins. The ThinkSono system is CE Mark approved in the European Union and in clinical use in Europe. Usually, when an ultrasound is conducted to detect blood clots in veins, a sonographer (trained technologist who conducts ultrasounds) and/or radiologist will conduct the procedure, including a compression ultrasound exam, and the scan may require a bulky cart and ultrasound equipment. ThinkSono Guidance is a mobile software application that enables other healthcare professionals such as nurses, non-radiologist physicians including general practitioners, and other allied healthcare professionals to perform the ultrasound at the point of care using guidance from the software app. This is a multi-site non-randomized, double-blinded, prospective cohort pivotal study.
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is well recognized to cause significant morbidity and mortality both at the time of diagnosis and post-diagnosis. With an estimated incidence of 1- 2 per 1,000 people, over to 300,000 people in the US will be diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE) per annum and two-thirds of these will be DVT. However, positive cases only represent 12-25% of the total number of patients who present with suspected DVT. In other words, between 75-88% of suspected DVT cases, when fully investigated, are negative. Estimates have placed the yearly cost of VTE to the US healthcare system at up to $10 billion.
It is notoriously difficult to diagnose a DVT by clinical acumen alone. The standard approach to making a diagnosis of proximal DVT currently involves an algorithm combining pre-test probability assessment through the Wells score, and compression ultrasonography. Handheld ultrasound probes have recently become available. These probes have enabled 'app-based' compression ultrasonography to be performed without the need for bulky cart or laptop-based ultrasound machines. These new machines have a small form factor, meaning only the ultrasound probe is required for diagnostic purposes in conjunction with a smartphone or tablet.
At present, although the new handheld probes are smaller and are better suited for point of care diagnosis, they still require an experienced radiologist or sonographer to perform the compression exam. This means that these devices can only be used wherever sonographers/radiologists are based most often i.e. hospital radiology departments. However, due to recent advances in "machine learning", software is now being developed for these 'app-based' probes that can assist non-radiology specialist healthcare professionals (e.g. nurses, non-radiologist physicians, general practitioners and other allied healthcare professionals) to carry out the compression ultrasound exam with minimal training.
ThinkSono Guidance is a guidance software expected to help non-radiology specialist healthcare professionals produce compression ultrasound image data that meet or exceed the minimal image quality criteria for a remote diagnosis by an expert (e.g. radiologist). The ThinkSono system is CE Mark approved in the European Union and in clinical use in Europe.
This study is a multi-site non-randomized, double-blinded, prospective cohort pivotal study. The purpose of this study is to confirm the safety and efficacy of ThinkSono Guidance as per the intended use defined as:
ThinkSono Guidance is a guidance, data acquisition and communication tool that guides non-ultrasound-trained healthcare staff to collect point of care compression ultrasound data in the proximal deep venous system of the lower extremity for interpretation by qualified clinicians.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | Other | This arm of patients will undergo an ultrasound scan using the ThinkSono system and a comparison standard of care duplex ultrasound scan. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ThinkSono System | Device | The ThinkSono Guidance System is a guidance software expected to help non-radiology specialist healthcare professionals produce compression ultrasound image data that meet or exceed the minimal image quality criteria for a remote diagnosis by an expert (e.g. radiologist). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality Adequacy | ThinkSono Guidance achieves adequate image quality with an American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) score equal to or greater than 3 in at least 60% of scans to show that non-ultrasound-trained operators can acquire relevant cine-loops (an expectation ≥75%, lower CI ≥60%). The ACEP score is a score on a scale of 1-5 assessing utilized as the national standard for image quality evaluation. Further information is available at: https://www.acep.org/siteassets/uploads/uploaded-files/acep/clinical-and-practice-management/policy-statements/information-papers/emergency-ultrasound-standard-reporting-guidelines---2018.pdf. | Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes). |
| Triage Sensitivity | The sensitivity for overall triage performance for proximal DVT is at least 85%. | Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes). |
| Triage Specificity | The specificity for overall triage performance for proximal DVT is at least 30%. | Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes). |
| Prioritization Specificity | Prioritization specificity quantifies how reliably the system identifies patients who merit high-urgency imaging specialist assessment based on their ThinkSono scans. A high prioritization specificity means that there are very few false-positive scans that lead to patients being prioritized unnecessarily. Further details are available in the trial protocol and statistical analysis plan. ThinkSono Guidance achieves specificity for prioritizing patients of at least 93%. This means that at least 93% of scans without proximal lower extremity DVT were not labeled as false positives by reviewers of ThinkSono Guidance scans. | Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Predictive Values | To observe the negative-predictive-value and positive-predictive-value of ThinkSono Guidance triage performance. | Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Serial Ultrasound Sensitivity | Clinical practice guidelines for proximal compression ultrasound recommend a repeat scan within a week if the initial scan is negative, in order to identify any progression of initially undetectable thrombi. Repeat scans were unfeasible and not clinically indicated for subjects in this study, and this outcome measure was simulated. Further details are available in the trial protocol and statistical analysis plan. This figure represents the estimated sensitivity of a repeated ThinkSono Guidance scan for lower extremity proximal DVT 1 week after the initial scan, as per clinical guidelines. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Glenn Jacobowitz, MD | Northwell Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYU Langone Health | New York | New York | 10016 | United States | ||
| Temple Health |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38866404 | Background | Nothnagel K, Aslam MF. Evaluating the benefits of machine learning for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis compared with gold standard ultrasound: a feasibility study. BJGP Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(4):BJGPO.2024.0057. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0057. Print 2024 Dec. | |
| 23131597 | Background | Poulikidis KP, Gasparis AP, Labropoulos N. Prospective analysis of incidence, extent and chronicity of lower extremity venous thrombosis. Phlebology. 2014 Feb;29(1):37-42. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2012.012086. Epub 2013 May 6. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Study sponsor website | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Single Arm | This arm of patients will undergo an ultrasound scan using the ThinkSono system and a comparison standard of care duplex ultrasound scan. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Single Arm | This arm of patients will undergo an ultrasound scan using the ThinkSono system and a comparison standard of care duplex ultrasound scan. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Image Quality Adequacy | ThinkSono Guidance achieves adequate image quality with an American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) score equal to or greater than 3 in at least 60% of scans to show that non-ultrasound-trained operators can acquire relevant cine-loops (an expectation ≥75%, lower CI ≥60%). The ACEP score is a score on a scale of 1-5 assessing utilized as the national standard for image quality evaluation. Further information is available at: https://www.acep.org/siteassets/uploads/uploaded-files/acep/clinical-and-practice-management/policy-statements/information-papers/emergency-ultrasound-standard-reporting-guidelines---2018.pdf. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of scans | Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes). |
|
Data on adverse events were collected from participants while undergoing ThinkSono Guidance scanning on the day of enrollment. Subjects were also given contact information for the study team and were able to contact them to report any adverse events at any point up to 12 months after the date of enrollment.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Single Arm | This arm of patients will undergo an ultrasound scan using the ThinkSono system and a comparison standard of care duplex ultrasound scan. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giancarlo Speranza MD, MBA | ThinkSono, Ltd. | 2127637111 | giancarlo@thinksono.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 1, 2025 | Jan 20, 2026 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020246 | Venous Thrombosis |
| D011655 | Pulmonary Embolism |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013927 | Thrombosis |
| D016769 | Embolism and Thrombosis |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| South Texas Veterans Health Care System | FED |
Single arm comparison study between the ThinkSono device and standard of care venous duplex ultrasound.
Not provided
Not provided
Though not masked, the study is double blinded. Double blinding will be ensured by the ThinkSono software, as it will not be giving any indication of diagnosis or image quality to the operator. The comparison scan will be done by a qualified imaging specialist as per the standard of care at the local institution, but they will also not know the results of the ThinkSono scan. There will also be "remote qualified clinicians" reviewing the ThinkSono data (separately from local staff) who also will not know the results of the local imaging specialist. Only at the final data assessment upon study completion will outcome assessors be aware of ThinkSono device results and local site imaging results.
Not provided
|
| Measured at the time of ThinkSono Guidance scanning, during scan review by qualified clinicians, and during simulation of serial ultrasound scanning. |
| Philadelphia |
| Pennsylvania |
| 19140 |
| United States |
| Allegheny Health Network | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15212 | United States |
| South Texas Veterans Health System | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| University of Wisconsin-Madison | Madison | Wisconsin | 53792 | United States |
| 26654719 | Background | Grosse SD, Nelson RE, Nyarko KA, Richardson LC, Raskob GE. The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs. Thromb Res. 2016 Jan;137:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.11.033. Epub 2015 Nov 24. |
| 19222476 | Background | Prandoni P, Kahn SR. Post-thrombotic syndrome: prevalence, prognostication and need for progress. Br J Haematol. 2009 May;145(3):286-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07601.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13. |
| 24441147 | Background | Roberts LN, Patel RK, Donaldson N, Bonner L, Arya R. Post-thrombotic syndrome is an independent determinant of health-related quality of life following both first proximal and distal deep vein thrombosis. Haematologica. 2014 Mar;99(3):e41-3. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.089870. Epub 2014 Jan 17. No abstract available. |
| 9537941 | Background | Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE, Ginsberg JS. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 15;128(8):663-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-8-199804150-00011. |
| 34526639 | Background | Kainz B, Heinrich MP, Makropoulos A, Oppenheimer J, Mandegaran R, Sankar S, Deane C, Mischkewitz S, Al-Noor F, Rawdin AC, Ruttloff A, Stevenson MD, Klein-Weigel P, Curry N. Non-invasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis from ultrasound imaging with machine learning. NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Sep 15;4(1):137. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00503-7. |
| 37820986 | Background | Oppenheimer J, Mandegaran R, Staabs F, Adler A, Singohl S, Kainz B, Heinrich M, Geroulakos G, Spiliopoulos S, Avgerinos E. Remote Expert DVT Triaging of Novice-User Compression Sonography with AI-Guidance. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Feb;99:272-279. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.022. Epub 2023 Oct 10. |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Body Mass Index | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Triage Sensitivity | The sensitivity for overall triage performance for proximal DVT is at least 85%. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of scans | Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes). |
|
|
|
| Primary | Triage Specificity | The specificity for overall triage performance for proximal DVT is at least 30%. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of scans | Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes). |
|
|
|
| Primary | Prioritization Specificity | Prioritization specificity quantifies how reliably the system identifies patients who merit high-urgency imaging specialist assessment based on their ThinkSono scans. A high prioritization specificity means that there are very few false-positive scans that lead to patients being prioritized unnecessarily. Further details are available in the trial protocol and statistical analysis plan. ThinkSono Guidance achieves specificity for prioritizing patients of at least 93%. This means that at least 93% of scans without proximal lower extremity DVT were not labeled as false positives by reviewers of ThinkSono Guidance scans. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of scans | Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes). |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Predictive Values | To observe the negative-predictive-value and positive-predictive-value of ThinkSono Guidance triage performance. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of scans | Measured during ThinkSono Guidance scanning (median scan time of 5.4 minutes). |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Serial Ultrasound Sensitivity | Clinical practice guidelines for proximal compression ultrasound recommend a repeat scan within a week if the initial scan is negative, in order to identify any progression of initially undetectable thrombi. Repeat scans were unfeasible and not clinically indicated for subjects in this study, and this outcome measure was simulated. Further details are available in the trial protocol and statistical analysis plan. This figure represents the estimated sensitivity of a repeated ThinkSono Guidance scan for lower extremity proximal DVT 1 week after the initial scan, as per clinical guidelines. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of scans | Measured at the time of ThinkSono Guidance scanning, during scan review by qualified clinicians, and during simulation of serial ultrasound scanning. |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 594 |
| 0 |
| 594 |
| 0 |
| 594 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D008171 |
| Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D004617 | Embolism |