Comparison Between Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession and Bilateral Primary Medial Rectus Resection in Basic Type Intermittent Exotropia
Comparison Between Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession and Bilateral Primary Medial Rectus Resection in Basic Type Intermittent Exotropia
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of bilateral lateral rectus recession and bilateral primary medial rectus resection in basic type intermittent exotropia
Participants will be randomized into two groups: bilateral lateral rectus (BLR) recession and bilateral medial rectus (BMR) resection groups then followed up in the clinic for 6 months to compare motor alignment and sensory functions
Study location: Cairo university hospitals
Methodology:
Patients with basic type intermittent exotropia who are indicated to undergo surgical intervention will be grouped into two groups one group will undergo bilateral lateral rectus recession and the other will undergo bilateral medial rectus resection.
Preoperatively, all patients will be subjected to:
A detailed history taking including presence of asthenopia, monocular closure, disfigurement or diplopia. The previous use of glasses for optical correction, use of minus lenses, or prior part time occlusion will be documented.
A detailed ophthalmological examination; including uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity whenever possible, cycloplegic refraction, anterior segment examination and dilated fundus examination.
Motor Evaluation:
Patients with near-far disparity >10 prism diopters (PD) will not be included
Sensory Evaluation:
Worth 4 dot test and stereopsis using Random dot test (when possible) The control of exotropia will be assessed using both the newcastle control score
Patients will be randomly assigned to either surgery using simple randomization by random number generator
Intervention:
Postoperative assessment:
Extraocular movement in lateral gazes will be examined for comitance
Alignment in the primary position will be assessed and any deviation will be measured using alternate prism cover test
Palpebral fissure height will be measured
Worth 4 dot test and stereopsis will be assessed (when possible)
Sample size
We are planning a study of the difference in the postoperative angle between the 2 surgical techniques. Assuming a mean difference of 5 PD with a standard deviation of 5 PD, an alpha error of 0.05 and a power of study of 0.8, a total of 17 subjects were found to be needed in each group. Assuming a drop-out rate of 20%, a sample of 20 subjects will be targeted in each group.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: