Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Intracranial hypertension (ICH) is a common and serious complication in children admitted to pediatric intensive care units. It is primarily caused by traumatic brain injury but can also result from brain malformations, brain tumors, or neuro-meningeal infections. Rapid identification of ICH in acute settings is crucial to ensure prompt management and mitigate potential consequences, such as severe neurological sequelae or death.
The assessment of the pupillary light reflex is one of the key clinical parameters used to identify ICH in children with neurological injuries. This clinical sign is correlated with neurological prognosis. During an episode of ICH, regardless of the underlying cause, the oculomotor nerve becomes compressed between the midbrain and the temporal lobe, leading to anisocoria (unequal pupil sizes) and loss of pupillary reactivity. Other factors, such as episodes of ischemia or hypoperfusion in the midbrain, can also contribute to decreased pupillary reactivity.
Traditionally, the pupillary light reflex is assessed using a simple light source, with subjective evaluation by a healthcare professional. However, this method has significant inter- and intra-individual variability. Quantitative pupillometry offers a more objective and reproducible way to evaluate pupillary reactivity. In adults, some parameters are well-known indicators of ICH, such as a constriction velocity of less than 0.6 mm/sec and a constriction percentage below 10%. The constriction percentage can be simplified with the Neurological Pupil index (NPI), which ranges from 0 to 5. An NPI of 4 or 5 is considered to indicate good pupillary reactivity. The two quantitative pupillometers currently on the market (Neurolight, Neuroptics) appear to provide similar data for most variables assessed. However, there are few studies evaluating this tool in pediatric patients with neurological injuries.
One study on quantitative pupillometry found that children with neurological injuries and an intracranial pressure (ICP) above 20 mmHg had significantly lower pupillary reactivity, NPI, constriction percentage, and dilation and constriction velocities compared to children without ICH.
Osmotherapy is a commonly used pharmacological intervention in pediatrics to lower intracranial pressure and improve cerebral perfusion pressure. Based on the work of Freeman et al., we hypothesize that the pupillary constriction percentage improves after osmotherapy in children with neurological injuries.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| severe head trauma in children with osmotherapy treatment | Admission to the pediatric intensive care or neurosurgical intensive care unit, pupillometry measurement before and after osmotherapy treatment |
| |
| pupillometry measurement in non-cerebral pediatric patients | feasibility of pupillometry in children for different age groups and obtain baseline values for non-neurologically sedated children in 4 age groups from 0 to 17 years of age in intensive care and the operating room |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pupillometer | Device | describe the feasibility of pupillometry measurements in sedated but non-cerebrosed children in intensive care and the operating room |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| to describe and evaluate the variation in the percentage of pupillary constriction (CON) before, and after osmotherapy in neuro-injured children. | Delta (in percentage difference, and in delta of values) of the constriction (CON) between the last available measurement before the osmotherapy was started, and the measurement 5 minutes after the end (at 25 minutes after the start of the osmotherapy). For each child, the eye with the lowest constriction (CON) value before osmotherapy will be considered. | at 10 days |
| Describe the feasibility of pupillometry in children for different age groups, and obtain baseline values for the sedated, non-neurosed child. | Success rate in obtaining pupillometric values for different age groups. Pupillometric values: QPI (quantitative pupillometry index) in intensive care and the operating room | at 1 minute and 25 minutes |
| Describe the feasibility of pupillometry in children for different age groups, and obtain baseline values for the sedated, non-neurosed child. | Success rate in obtaining pupillometric values for different age groups. Pupillometric values: latency (LAT) in intensive care and the operating room | at 1 minute and 25 minutes |
| Describe the feasibility of pupillometry in children for different age groups, and obtain baseline values for the sedated, non-neurosed child. | Success rate in obtaining pupillometric values for different age groups. Pupillometric values: constriction velocity (ACV) and dilatation velocity (ADV) in mm/sec in intensive care and the operating room | at 1 minute and 25 minutes |
| Describe the feasibility of pupillometry in children for different age groups, and obtain baseline values for the sedated, non-neurosed child. | Success rate in obtaining pupillometric values for different age groups. Pupillometric values: minimum (MIN) and maximum (MAX) pupillary diameter in mm in intensive care and the operating room |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| In the age subgroup of children with an intracranial pressure (ICP) sensor (pathological if ICP more than 20mmHg), evaluate the relationship between intracranial pressure and the various pupillometry values (LAT). | Assessing the association between latency in sec (LAT) and ICP (mmhg) | per 12h during 10 days |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
children aged 1 month to 17 years with brain lesion receiving osmotherapy
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah SS SINTZEL STRIPPPOLI, Doctor | Contact | 0476766729 | +33 | ssintzelstrippoli@chu-grenoble.fr |
| Angélina AP POLLET, RESEARCH NURSE | Contact | 0476766729 | +33 | apollet@chu-grenoble.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chu Grenoble Alpes | Recruiting | Grenoble | ISERE | 387000 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31555934 | Background | Winston M, Zhou A, Rand CM, Dunne EC, Warner JJ, Volpe LJ, Pigneri BA, Simon D, Bielawiec T, Gordon SC, Vitez SF, Charnay A, Joza S, Kelly K, Panicker C, Rizvydeen S, Niewijk G, Coleman C, Scher BJ, Reed DW, Hockney SM, Buniao G, Stewart T, Trojanowski L, Brogadir C, Price M, Kenny AS, Bradley A, Volpe NJ, Weese-Mayer DE. Pupillometry measures of autonomic nervous system regulation with advancing age in a healthy pediatric cohort. Clin Auton Res. 2020 Feb;30(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s10286-019-00639-3. Epub 2019 Sep 25. | |
| 16383247 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Epidemiology of head injuries in France and other Western countries | View source |
Not provided
This is an observational study, which does not modify the management of children with brain lesions, nor does it generate additional therapies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006259 | Craniocerebral Trauma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| pupillometer | Device | Pupillometry measurements at 5 and 25 minutes for children treated with osmotherapy, followed by measurements twice a day during hospitalization in the intensive care unit |
|
| at 1 minute and 25 minutes |
| In the age subgroup of children with an intracranial pressure (ICP) sensor (pathological if ICP more than 20mmHg), evaluate the relationship between intracranial pressure and the various pupillometry values (QPI). |
Assessing the association between measurements of pupillometry, QPI, quantitative pupillometry index |
| per 12h during 10 days |
| In the age subgroup of children with an intracranial pressure (ICP) sensor (pathological if ICP more than 20mmHg), evaluate the relationship between intracranial pressure and the various pupillometry values.(CON) | Assessing the association between measurements of pupillometry, percentage of constriction (CON) and ICP. | per 12h during 10 days |
| In the age subgroup of children with an intracranial pressure (ICP) sensor (pathological if more than 20mmHg), evaluate the relationship between intracranial pressure and the various pupillometry values (Max; Min) | To asses association between intracranial pressure and minimum et maximum pupillary diameter (in mm). | per 12h during 10 days |
| In the age subgroup of children with an intracranial pressure (ICP) sensor (pathological if more than 20mmHg), evaluate the relationship between intracranial pressure and the various pupillometry values. (ACV and ADV) | To asses association between ICP and pupillometry values : constriction velocity (ACV) and dilatation velocity (ADV) in mm.sec | per 12h during 10 days |
| Comparison of pupillometry values between neuro-sedated and non-neuro-sedated children, adjusting for age | measurement of pupillometric parameters : latence (in sec) | at 1 and 25 minutes |
| Comparison of pupillometry values between neuro-sedated and non-neuro-sedated children, adjusting for age. | measurement of pupillometric parameters : quantitative pupillometry index, pupil constriction | at 1 and 25 minutes |
| Comparison of pupillometry values between neuro-sedated and non-neuro-sedated children, adjusting for age. | measurement of pupillometric parameters : Minimum and maximum pupillary diameter (in mm) | at 1 and 25 minutes |
| Comparison of pupillometry values between neuro-sedated and non-neuro-sedated children, adjusting for age. | measurement of pupillometric parameters constriction velocity (ACV), dilatation velocity (ADV) in mm/sec | at 1 and 25 min |
| Describe the evolution of different pupillometry measurements before and after osmotherapy | Measure of pupillometry: CON and QPI after osmotherapy administration | at 15 , 25, 35, 45, 60, 120, 240 minutes |
| Describe the evolution of different pupillometry measurements before and after osmotherapy | Measure of pupillometry : constriction velocity (ACV), dilatation velocity (ADV) in mm/sec | [Time Frame: at 15 , 25, 35, 45, 60, 120, 240 minutes] |
| Describe the evolution of different pupillometry measurements before and after osmotherapy | Measure of pupillometry: latence (in mm) | [Time Frame: at 15 , 25, 35, 45, 60, 120, 240 minutes] |
| Describe the evolution of different pupillometry measurements before and after osmotherapy | Measure of pupillometry: Min and max pupillary diameter in mm. | at 15 , 25, 35, 45, 60, 120, 240 minutes |
| Assessing the relationship between transcranial Doppler (CTD) results: pulsatility index (PI) and diastolic velocity (Vd) | Repeated pupillometry measurements : (LAT) latence in sec and transcranial doppler | 2 times a day for 10 days or on discharge from hospital |
| Assessing the relationship between transcranial Doppler (CTD) results: pulsatility index (PI) and diastolic velocity (Vd) | Repeated pupillometry measurements QPI and CON and transcranial doppler | 2 times a day for 10 days or on discharge from hospital |
| Assessing the relationship between transcranial Doppler (CTD) results: pulsatility index (PI) and diastolic velocity (Vd) | Repeated pupillometry measurements (Maximum and minimum pupillary diameter in mm) and transcranial doppler | 2 times a day for 10 days or on discharge from hospital |
| Assessing the relationship between transcranial Doppler (CTD) results: pulsatility index (PI) and diastolic velocity (Vd) | Repeated pupillometry measurements (constriction velocity (ACV) and dilatation velocity (ADV) in mm.sec) and transcranial doppler | 2 times a day for 10 days or on discharge from hospital |
| Grenoble Alpes University Hospital | Not yet recruiting | La Tronche | 38700 | France |
|
| Background |
| Boev AN, Fountas KN, Karampelas I, Boev C, Machinis TG, Feltes C, Okosun I, Dimopoulos V, Troup C. Quantitative pupillometry: normative data in healthy pediatric volunteers. J Neurosurg. 2005 Dec;103(6 Suppl):496-500. doi: 10.3171/ped.2005.103.6.0496. |
| 23433043 | Background | Rouche O, Wolak-Thierry A, Destoop Q, Milloncourt L, Floch T, Raclot P, Jolly D, Cousson J. Evaluation of the depth of sedation in an intensive care unit based on the photo motor reflex variations measured by video pupillometry. Ann Intensive Care. 2013 Feb 22;3(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-5. |
| 32195898 | Background | Freeman AD, McCracken CE, Stockwell JA. Automated Pupillary Measurements Inversely Correlate With Increased Intracranial Pressure in Pediatric Patients With Acute Brain Injury or Encephalopathy. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;21(8):753-759. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002327. |
| 31033624 | Background | Robba C, Moro Salihovic B, Pozzebon S, Creteur J, Oddo M, Vincent JL, Taccone FS. Comparison of 2 Automated Pupillometry Devices in Critically III Patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;32(4):323-329. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000604. |
| 31601157 | Background | Bower MM, Sweidan AJ, Xu JC, Stern-Neze S, Yu W, Groysman LI. Quantitative Pupillometry in the Intensive Care Unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):383-391. doi: 10.1177/0885066619881124. Epub 2019 Oct 10. |
| 10232526 | Background | Ritter AM, Muizelaar JP, Barnes T, Choi S, Fatouros P, Ward J, Bullock MR. Brain stem blood flow, pupillary response, and outcome in patients with severe head injuries. Neurosurgery. 1999 May;44(5):941-8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199905000-00005. |
| 12172296 | Background | Manley GT, Larson MD. Infrared pupillometry during uncal herniation. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2002 Jul;14(3):223-8. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200207000-00009. |
| 33003179 | Background | Rameshkumar R, Bansal A, Singhi S, Singhi P, Jayashree M. Randomized Clinical Trial of 20% Mannitol Versus 3% Hypertonic Saline in Children With Raised Intracranial Pressure Due to Acute CNS Infections. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;21(12):1071-1080. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002557. |
| 25735686 | Background | Piper BJ, Harrigan PW. Hypertonic saline in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a review of nine years' experience with 23.4% hypertonic saline as standard hyperosmolar therapy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Mar;43(2):204-10. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300210. |
| 35267036 | Background | Kochanek PM, Adelson PD, Rosario BL, Hutchison J, Miller Ferguson N, Ferrazzano P, O'Brien N, Beca J, Sarnaik A, LaRovere K, Bennett TD, Deep A, Gupta D, Willyerd FA, Gao S, Wisniewski SR, Bell MJ; ADAPT Investigators. Comparison of Intracranial Pressure Measurements Before and After Hypertonic Saline or Mannitol Treatment in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e220891. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0891. |
| 27838440 | Background | Rallis D, Poulos P, Kazantzi M, Chalkias A, Kalampalikis P. Effectiveness of 7.5% hypertonic saline in children with severe traumatic brain injury. J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 21. |
| 21207041 | Background | Melo JR, Di Rocco F, Blanot S, Cuttaree H, Sainte-Rose C, Oliveira-Filho J, Zerah M, Meyer PG. Transcranial Doppler can predict intracranial hypertension in children with severe traumatic brain injuries. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011 Jun;27(6):979-84. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1367-8. Epub 2011 Jan 5. |
| intracranial hypertension in infants | View source |