Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Introduction: The investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of non-extraction orthodontic treatment for Angle class I malocclusion.
Many people are also concerned about their oral health. When social communication is more important, aesthetic concerns also receive a lot of attention. A beautiful smile can boost self-assurance and empathy. Angle class I malocclusion is prevalent, and dental malocclusion is a significant percentage of the population at all ages . Tooth extraction is a controversial topic in orthodontics, with the general view being against it. Angle and his students argued against it, but Charles Tweed saw recurrence in the 1930s after retreatment without extraction and retreatment with extraction. The use of tooth extraction therapy increased in the 1960s but has become less common since the late 20th century. The science of orthodontics has made significant advancements under the principle of least invasiveness, but the debate remains about whether to consider tooth extraction. The contemporary view believes that the majority of patients may and should be treated without tooth extraction, but in rare circumstances, extraction is necessary to make up for crowding and excessive incisor protrusion that harm the beauty. In truth, each individual must be thoroughly evaluated in light of their bite, cosmetic condition, and stability in the wake of therapy before any course of action is recommended. The investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of non-extraction orthodontic treatment for Angle class I malocclusion.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cephalometric radiographs and cast impressions were collected before and after intervention. | Other | Cephalometric radiographs, and extraoral and intraoral photographs, and cast impressions were collected before and after intervention. The weighted PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating) employed to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment of Angle Class I Malocclusion | Other | Cephalometric radiographs, and extraoral and intraoral photographs, and cast impressions were collected before and after intervention. The weighted PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating) employed to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment. Also the following soft tissue and bone indexes were assessed before and after intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of non-extraction orthodontic treatment for Angle class I malocclusion. | Cephalometric radiographs, and extraoral and intraoral photographs, and cast impressions were collected before and after intervention. The weighted PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating) employed to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment | Cephalometric radiographs, and extraoral and intraoral photographs, cast impressions and PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating) were collected before and after intervention through study completion, an average of 2 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Face soft tissue surgical procedures, periodontal disease, and maxillofacial congenital anomalies
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Diem Chau Hong, DDS | Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy | Can Tho | 900000 | Vietnam |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35265132 | Result | Baik KM, Anbar G, Alshaikh A, Banjar A. Effect of Social Media on Patient's Perception of Dental Aesthetics in Saudi Arabia. Int J Dent. 2022 Feb 27;2022:4794497. doi: 10.1155/2022/4794497. eCollection 2022. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008311 | Malocclusion, Angle Class I |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008310 | Malocclusion |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Cephalometric radiographs, and extraoral and intraoral photographs, and cast impressions were collected before and after intervention. The weighted PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating) employed to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment. Also the following soft tissue and bone indexes were assessed before and after intervention, SNA, SNB, ANB, SN_GoGn, SN_Occplane, U1_NAmm, U1_NA, L1_NBmm, L1_NB, U1_L1, U1_Mp, Ls_E, Li_E, and Nasolabial_angle. Intervention was MBT (MBT System, 3M Unitek, USA) non-extraction fixed orthodontic treatment. One experienced researcher analyzed and interpreted all of the cephalometric images used in the study using the WedCeph (https://webceph.com/). Data were analyzed by linear regression and T-Test statistical test using R software version 4.3.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) by a blinded statistician.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|