Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ViiV Healthcare | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of The EXPAND study is to develop and pilot a pharmacist led model of medication delivery. Following a co-design phase, patients may receive injections at satellite pharmacies by a licensed pharmacist. The acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of this approach and standard in clinic administration by a nurse will be assessed.
The EXPAND study will involve three phases:
Phase 1 A care delivery model incorporating pharmacist administered CAB+RPV LA at satellite pharmacies will be developed using codesign. A core group of stakeholders will be engaged in codesigning the intervention. Stakeholders will include HIV physicians, HIV nurses, electronic health record informatics experts, pharmacists, and 3 PWH who are currently receiving CAB+RPV LA. Engaging with patients in codesign ensures patient experience and input is incorporated since the primary goal is improving their health. Bringing stakeholders together to generate solutions ahead of the implementation significantly impacts buy-in.
Codesign team meetings will be convened as hybrid one hour meetings, i.e., in person with option for attendance via virtual platform - Webex or Zoom. There will be 5-6 design team meetings. Number of meetings will depend on progress towards producing a process map outlining the pharmacist administered CAB+RPV LA model of care. Content of meetings will include: introduction to codesign and EXPAND; establishment of current workflow for CAB+RPV LA administration by nurse in clinic; determination of essential components; production of process map outlining pharmacist administered CAB+RPV LA work flow; outlining changes from prior work flow to inform clinical staff education, make changes to electronic health record tools. The final process map will be sent to design team members for verification and additional recommendations.
After the design team work is complete, semi-structured interviews with design team members will be conducted to evaluate the codesign process to improve codesign internally and disseminate findings to inform best practices for conducting codesign activities for models of HIV care delivery and treatment for HIV. These interviews will be performed by trained interviewers from the Population Health Institute at MH. Interviews will take place by phone or in a private room, and audio recordings will later be transcribed verbatim.
Phase 2 After completion of codesign process, a single arm, pilot study of the pharmacist administered CAB+RPV LA model will be performed at a pilot site. Four patient participants with diverse backgrounds will be enrolled and all will receive their CAB+RPV LA in the pharmacist administered CAB+RPV LA model. After 1 dose of CAB+RPV LA are administered by a pharmacist at a satellite MetroHealth pharmacy, semi-structured in-depth qualitative interviews with each participant, pharmacist, and nurse post-pilot will inform the final pharmacist administered CAB+RPV LA model.
Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), these initial qualitative interviews will focus on illuminating insight to participants' (i.e., innovation recipients') impressions of, specifically, the innovation relative advantage (e.g., benefits and quality of the pharmacist-administered CAB+RPV LA model compared to current practice) and innovation adaptability (e.g., how participants' experience of receiving pharmacist-administered injections aligns with their own and peers' needs). These interviews will be performed by trained interviewers from the Population Health Institute at MH. Interviews will take place in a private room, and audio recordings will later be transcribed verbatim. This data will be aggregated and utilized to refine the intervention toward maximally appropriate design, complexity, and usability for Phase 3.
Phase 3 Finally, a parallel arm, 48-week, prospective, non-randomized study of the pharmacist administered CAB+RPV LA model and the in clinic nurse administered CAB+RPV LA model will be completed. Both patient (N=140) and staff (N=20) participants will be enrolled and a mixed methods approach will be performed. The decision to initiate CAB+RPV LA is at the discretion of the patient and their provider, i.e. study staff will not participate in this decision.
The Proctor Framework will be used to evaluate implementation outcomes focusing on acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. All participants (patients and staff) will complete the previously validated Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) and Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and staff participants also complete the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) at baseline, week 16 and 48. CFIR will comprehensively guide semi-structured qualitative interviews to complement the structured surveys and develop a more nuanced understanding of patient and staff perspectives of the novel pharmacist administered CAB+RPV LA model. Interviews of a subset of patient participants will occur at baseline, and 48 weeks. In-depth interview guides will be developed to inquire along specific CFIR domains of innovation (e.g., how calibrated is the pharmacist-administered innovative treatment to patients' clinical and psychosocial needs?), inner setting (e.g., how do physical and relational infrastructure components of the treatment setting support patients' treatment and wellbeing?), and individuals (e.g., how do patients as innovation recipients view treatment innovations as aligning with their own priorities, preferences, and needs?). Interviews of all staff participants will occur 48 weeks after the initial patient participant is enrolled and will focus on facilitators and barriers to sustainability. Interviews will be performed by trained interviewers from the Population Health Department at MH throughout the study. These interviews will take place in a private room, and audio recordings will later be transcribed verbatim.
Approach to participants who switch groups during study: Participants who decide to switch to the other model of care after the entry visit will be allowed to continue on study. Week of switch will be captured. Each switch participant will be approached for qualitative interview to assess reasons for switch. Data will continue to be collected as per schedule of evaluations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient participants receiving in clinic nurse administered long-acting injectable ART | People with HIV on long acting cabotegravir + rilpivirine who elect to continue to receive their injections in clinic by a nurse |
| |
| Patient participants receiving pharmacist administered long-acting injectable ART in pharmacy | People with HIV on long acting cabotegravir + rilpivirine who elect to continue to receive their injections in a satellite pharmacy by a pharmacist |
| |
| Staff participants | Staff involved in the long-acting injectable ART workflow |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model of care delivery for long-acting injectable ART | Other | This study is assessing a novel model of care delivery, i.e. pharmacist administered long-acting cabotegravir + rilpivirine (CAB+RPV LA). In phase 2 and 3, no medication will be provided by the study. The decision to initiate CAB+RPV LA will be at the discretion of the patient and their provider in accordance with both standard of care and local prescribing practices. This will occur independent of study participation. The study intervention is the model of care for CAB+RPV LA administration. The models of care being studied include (1) pharmacist administered CAB+RPV LA in MetroHealth satellite pharmacy setting (novel model of care); (2) nurse administered CAB+RPV LA in the Infectious Diseases clinic at MetroHealth main campus (current standard of care). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of intervention | Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) | Entry, Week 16, Week 48 |
| Intervention appropriateness | Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) | Entry, Week 16, Week 48 |
| Feasibility of Intervention | Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) completed by staff participants only | Entry, Week 16, Week 48 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Facilitators and barriers to model of care | Semi-structured interviews conducted with patient participants | Entry, Week 48 |
| Organizational facilitators and barriers to sustainability for model of care |
Not provided
Patient Participant Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Participant Exclusion Criteria:
Staff Participant Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria:
-all available staff involved in the CAB+RPV LA workflow will be approached for inclusion
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patient participants will be recruited from the MetroHealth System's HIV provider clinics. Any patient who has decided with their provider to initiate CAB+RPV LA and has received at least two doses of CAB+RPV LA through in clinic nurse administration will be considered for enrollment. Decision to initiate CAB+RPV LA is made by a treating HIV physician with their patient and then is reviewed by an HIV pharmacist. This occurs within the context of clinical care without involvement of the study investigators. Staff participants will be recruited from nursing and physician staff in the HIV clinic, and pharmacy staff at the MetroHealth satellite pharmacies.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corrilynn O Hileman, MD | Contact | 216-778-7827 | chileman@metrohealth.org | |
| Demetria Web | Contact | 216-778-7827 | dwebb@metrohealth.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Corrilynn O Hileman, MD | MetroHealth System, Ohio | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
To collaborate regarding data collected as part of this study, please contact the PI.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Semi-structured interviews conducted with staff participants
| Week 48 |
| Fidelity | Proportion of CAB+RPV LA doses entry given within manufacturer's recommended dosing window | Week 16, Week 48 |
| Fidelity | Length of injection visits in minutes | Entry, Week 16, Week 48 |
| HIV treatment satisfaction | HIVTSQs | Entry, Week 16, Week 48 |
| HIV treatment satisfaction | HIVTSQc | Week 48 |
| Quality of life | 36-Item Short Form Survey | Entry, Week 48 |
| HIV stigma | HIV stigma survey | Entry, Week 48 |
| Virologic suppression | Proportion with HIV-1 RNA <=20 | Week 16, Week 48 |
| Confirmed virologic failure | 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA >=200 | Week 16, Week 48 |
| Treatment emergent resistance | Incidence of treatment emergent resistance | Week 16, Week 48 |
| Adverse events | Incidence and severity of adverse events | Week 16, Week 48 |
| Participant discontinuation | Proportion of patient participant discontinuation due to adverse events, incidence and severity of injection site reactions | Week 16, Week 48 |
| Injection site reactions | Incidence and severity of injection site reactions | Entry, Week 16, Week 48 |
| Engagement in HIV care | Proportion of HIV provider visits attended | Week 48 |
| Missed HIV provider appointments | Proportion of no shows to HIV provider visits | Week 48 |
| Routine HIV lab completion | Proportion with routine HIV labs done | Week 48 |
| Routine cholesterol lab completion | Proportion with routine cholesterol done | Week 48 |
| Routine renal function lab completion | Proportion with routine renal function lab done - serum creatinine or urine protein | Week 48 |
| Routine blood glucose assessment completion | Proportion with routine blood glucose assessment done - fasting blood glucose or hemoglobin A1C | Week 48 |
| Routine sexually transmitted infection screening completion | Proportion with routine screening for sexually transmitted infections - urine, or throat, or rectal gonorrhea, chlamydia, trichomonas screen, or syphilis serology in blood | Week 48 |