Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Over the past decade, implant research has focused on maintaining the health and stability of peri-implant tissues. A key factor is platform switching at the bone level, where a narrower abutment than the implant is used. This technique increases the implant's horizontal surface area for biological width establishment and reduces stress on the crestal bone.
Studies showed that repeated disconnection and reconnection of prosthetic components could compromise the mucosal barrier around implants, leading to an apical shift in the connective tissue junction and vertical tissue loss. This led to the "one abutment, one time" protocol, advocating the placement of the definitive abutment during initial implant surgery to avoid its removal during healing.
A recent meta-analysis indicated bone loss at the marginal level due to abutment connection and disconnection, despite different treatment protocols. Thus, a standardized abutment between the fixed prosthesis and the implant has been recommended to preserve marginal bone levels. This approach moves the biological width apically, protecting the bone from irritation and improving marginal bone isolation.
However, comparative evidence between direct implant-connected prostheses and trans-epithelial abutments is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the "one abutment, one time" protocol's effect on bone loss 12 months after prosthesis placement.
Secondary objectives include assessing patient satisfaction using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) during prosthesis fabrication and placement, and obtaining information on the diversity and function of microorganisms on the implant using metagenomic techniques 12 months post-prosthesis placement.
Throughout the prosthesis fabrication and the first 12 months, various evaluations will be conducted in both abutment and Ti-base groups:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abutment Group | Experimental | The patients in this group will undergo implant placement surgery using the conventional technique, which will include a full-thickness flap, biological drilling, and sub-crestal implant placement at 2 mm below the crest level. Since this is the Pilar group (Galimplant aesthetic straight abutment, NUEVAGALIMPANT), a 3 mm abutment will be placed during the same procedure, secured with a torque of 30 N. A healing cap will be applied and maintained until the osseointegration process is completed after three months. After three months, this group will receive a cement-retained and screw-retained zirconia prosthesis, which will be placed over the previously installed abutment. The crown screw will be torqued to 25 N. |
|
| ti-base Group | Experimental | The patients in this group will undergo implant placement surgery using the conventional technique, which will include a full-thickness flap, biological drilling, and sub-crestal implant placement at 2 mm below the crest level. Since this is the Tibase group (3 mm Tibase from Galimplant, NUEVAGALIMPANT), submerged healing will be performed with a healing cap connected to the implant, which will remain in place until the osseointegration process is completed after three months. After three months of osseointegration, a prosthesis will be placed directly connected to the implant platform via the 3 mm Tibase. The screw will be tightened to 30 N. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| abutment placement | Procedure | Placement of a subcrestal implant at more than 35 N and placement of a trans-epithelial abutment at 30 N |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| periimplant marginal bone loss | The peri-implant marginal bone level was measured using Image J software from the National Institutes of Health with an accuracy of 0.1 mm. A straight line was drawn at the implant platform level (representing zero height), and perpendicular lines were drawn from the mesial and distal sides of the platform to measure the distance to the bone level on each side | 12 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVID PEÑARROCHA, Professor | Contact | 697348312 | +34 | david.penarrocha@uv.es |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clínica Odontológica de la Universitat de Valencia, Fundación Lluis Alcanyis | Completed | Valencia | 46010 | Spain | ||
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001851 | Bone Diseases, Metabolic |
| D017060 | Patient Satisfaction |
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Ti-base placement | Procedure | Placement of a subcrestal implant at more than 35 N and placement of a Tibase placement at 30 N |
|
| Facultad de Medicina y Odontología de la Universitat de València |
| Recruiting |
| Valencia |
| 46010 |
| Spain |
|
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |