Subjects received a topical facial treatment applied by a license esthetician in a series of 3 sessions at 1 month intervals, in combination with a cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen over the course of 12 weeks.

The cleanser was instructed to be used twice daily over the course of 12 weeks

The primary efficacy endpoint will be Investigator Clinical Efficacy grading of parameters at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. the efficacy parameters will be assessed by the expert grader on each subjects global face using a modified Griffiths 10-point scale. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

The primary tolerability endpoint will be Investigator Tolerability Assessment of at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Local cutaneous tolerability will be evaluated by the expert grader by assessing the signs of erythema and dryness using a four-point scale: 0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

The primary tolerability endpoint will be Subjective Tolerability Assessment of at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Local cutaneous tolerability will be evaluated by subject reporting of the degree of burning, stinging, and itching globally on each subject's global face using a four-point scale: 0 = None 1 = Mild 2 = Moderate 3 = Severe. A decrease in score indicates an improvement.

The secondary endpoint will be subject self-assessment questionnaire completed at baseline, post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Subjects are asked to rate statements based on a scoring system ranging from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). A change in response values at post-application, and weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared to baseline response values indicates an improvement. The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement / question being asked.